Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Ability in Organizing Ideas through Thematic Progression in English Short Story
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.11084Keywords:
Pre-service teachers, English short story, Thematic Progression, Theme-Rheme, idea organizationAbstract
This study examines pre-service teachers’ ability to organize ideas in English short stories through thematic progression. Pre-service teachers as learners and future teachers need to understand how written texts work because they will later explain, model, and assess writing in classroom contexts. This study used Systemic Functional Linguistics as the analytical framework and English short stories as a narrative genre because short stories contain multiple clauses organized into meaningful sequences, making them suitable for examining thematic progression patterns. The genre also requires writers to organize events and ideas coherently across a temporal structure, which reflects their ability to manage discourse organization. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, with data collected from 23 English short stories written by fourth-semester pre-service teachers in the English Education Department. The data were analyzed by identifying clauses, determining the Theme and Rheme of each clause, and classifying the thematic progression patterns into constant theme, linear theme, and split theme. Rather than focusing only on textual coherence, this study also explores how thematic progression patterns reveal pre-service teachers’ organization of ideas in writing that reflects their writing ability. The findings reveal that three patterns appeared in pre-service teachers' writing, which are constant, linear, and split theme patterns. The constant theme pattern was the most dominant of the total data, and was followed by the linear theme pattern, while the split theme pattern appeared the lowest. These findings indicate that pre-service teachers’ ability to organize ideas is still developing. On the other hand, this finding contributed by extending thematic progression analysis to narrative genre and by positioning pre-service teachers as a critical population for writing pedagogy, also offers a linguistic and pedagogical basis for designing writing instruction that supports idea organization, coherence development, and narrative competence in English teacher education programs.
References
Anshu, A. H., & Yesuf, M. Y. (2022). Effects of Collaborative Writing on EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Performance: Focus on Content and Coherence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.36
Bowen. (2016). An Introduction to Document Analysis. Research Methodology in Education.
Bui, H. P., Nguyen, L. T., & Nguyen, T. V. (2023). An investigation into EFL pre-service teachers’ academic writing strategies. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13743
Castells, N., Minguela, M., & Nadal, E. (2023). Writing a synthesis versus reading: strategies involved and impact on comprehension. In Reading and Writing (Vol. 36, Number 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10341-y
Castillo-Cuesta, L., Quinonez-Beltran, A., Cabrera-Solano, P., Ochoa-Cueva, C., & Gonzalez-Torres, P. (2021). Using Digital Storytelling as a Strategy for Enhancing EFL Writing Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i13.22187
Chang, P., Tsai, C. C., & Chen, P. ju. (2020). Organization Strategies in EFL Expository Essays in a Content-Based Language Learning Course. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00464-2
Creswell, W. John & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, 53(9).
Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Academia.
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Journal for the Study of English Linguistics.
Feri, Z. O., Triyono, S., Ashadi, & Pranowo, D. D. (2023). Thematic Structure in Students’ Writings: Implications on their Ideas Organization and Development. Register Journal, 16(01), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v16i1.49-72
Fitriati, S. W., & Gayatri, N. M. (2021). Thematic Progression in Efl Learners’ Writing: A Literature Riview. 15(December), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7645
Graham, S., Kim, Y. S., Cao, Y., Lee, J. won, Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Treatments for Students in Grades 6–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(7). https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000819
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. In Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Hoang, D. T. N., & Hoang, T. (2024). Enhancing EFL students’ academic writing skills in online learning via Google Docs-based collaboration: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2083176
Ismail, A., Anwar, I. W., Sailuddin, S. P., & Ismail, H. (2024). Evaluating Cohesion and Coherence in Thesis Introductions: A Thematic Progression Analysis of EFL Students’ Texts. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v7i1.9594
Kim Nhung, L. T., & Huu Hiep, N. (2023). The Effects of Thematic Progression in Improving Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Writing. English Language Teaching, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n6p126
Kong, Y., Molnár, E. K., & Xu, N. (2022). Pre- and In-Service Teachers’ Assessment and Feedback in EFL Writing: Changes and Challenges. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221126672
Leong, P. A. (2019). Visualizing texts: a tool for generating thematic-progression diagrams. Functional Linguistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-019-0069-0
Lincoln, Yvonna. S., & Guba, Egon. G. (1985). Lincoln and Guba’s Evaluative Criteria. In Naturalistic Inquiry (Number 1985).
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
McHugh, M. L. (2012). McHugh-Interrater reliability. Biochemia Medica, 22(3).
Miles, M. B. H. A. M., & S. J. (2014). Drawing and Verifying Conclusions. In Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Pavavijarn, S. (2022). Influences of Thematic Progression on Quality of EFL Argumentative Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1).
Rahayu, A. R., Krisnawati, E., & Soemantri, Y. S. (2020). Theme and Thematic Progression in Narrative Texts of Indonesian EFL Learners. 5(3), 812–817.
Robledo, P., & Álvarez, M. L. (2024). Strategic and self-regulated instruction in synthesis tasks in the university context. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386907
Saeed, A., Karim, S., & Mughal, S. H. (2021). The impact of theme-rheme progression method on improving textual coherence and cohesion in L2 writing: A study of L2 learners of English. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2021.0902.0115
Sun, G., Ahmad, N. K., & Che Nawi, N. R. (2024). Investigating the Application of Thematic Progression in EFL Writing: A Systematic Review. In International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research (Vol. 23, Number 2). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.14
Tarigan, F. N., & Zahiri, A. (2025). Theme and Thematic Progression in EFL Students’ Writing: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis. SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v8i1.131
Uçar, S. (2023). A systematic review: An investigation of studies on the use of discourse connectors in Turkish EFL learners’ academic writing. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (36). https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1369163
Zhang, Y. (2022). Incorporating Peer Response with Teacher Feedback in Teaching Writing to EFL Learners: A Literature Review. English Language Teaching, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n3p48
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kusma Alesda Wati, Alan Jaelani, Amalul Umam, Adelina Fransiska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
