Language Assessment in Multicultural Primary Classrooms in Denpasar: Teachers’ Challenges and Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.11387Keywords:
challenges and strategies; language assessment; multicultural classroom; responsive language assessmentAbstract
Language assessment in multicultural primary classrooms requires teachers to distinguish linguistic difficulty from content knowledge while responding to culturally shaped ways of participating and demonstrating learning. This study investigates the challenges teachers encounter in conducting language assessment in multicultural primary schools in Denpasar, Bali, and the strategies they use to make assessment more equitable and meaningful. Using a qualitative case study design, the study involved 12 teachers from public and private primary schools selected for their experience in multicultural classrooms. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis and were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s procedures of familiarisation, coding, theme development, review, and naming. The findings show three interrelated areas of challenge: linguistic and comprehension barriers, cultural misalignment in interpreting student participation and performance, and limited access to culturally responsive assessment resources and institutional support. Teachers responded through differentiated assessment formats, visual and linguistic scaffolding, translanguaging, culturally relevant tasks, and regular formative feedback. The study is novel in examining teacher-reported challenges and responsive assessment strategies within the same multicultural primary-school cases in Denpasar, an urban context shaped by local Balinese culture, inter-island mobility, and international migration. The findings indicate that equitable language assessment depends not only on technical assessment quality but also on cultural validity, flexible opportunities for expression, and sustained institutional support. These context-specific findings extend discussion of culturally and linguistically responsive assessment in multilingual primary education.
References
Baidoo-Anu, D., Liu, L., Cisterna, D., & Song, Y. (2024). Cultural validity: Promoting cultural responsiveness in classroom assessment. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 18(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2023.2193883
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.
CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dobinson, T., Steele, C., & Winkler, G. (2025). From English-only to only English: Exploring children’s linguistic and cultural identities in a primary school classroom. Language and Education, 39(5), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2433675
Duong, L. T., & Khuong, P. D. (2025). Culturally responsive assessment practices in ethnic minority semi-boarding primary schools in Vietnam: A mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1670277. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1670277
Ezeh, C. C., & Kehinde, O. J. (2026). Promising practices for culturally relevant assessment: A systematic review. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 20(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2024.2341930
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800402
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Prastikawati, E. F., Curle, S., Adeoye, M. A., & Vivekanantharasa, R. (2025). Culturally responsive assessment in Teaching English to Young Learners: Valuing home languages and identities. Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (TEYLIN).
Robinson-Jones, C., Duarte, J., Chik, A., & Wang, H.-C. (2026). Linguistically responsive assessment for learning in primary education: A scoping review. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2026.2613680
Rosheim, K. M., Tamte, K. G., & Froemming, M. J. (2024). Reducing inequalities inherent in literacy assessment of multilingual learners. Reading Psychology, 45(8), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2359922
Yang, X. (2025). Linguistically responsive formative assessment for emergent bilinguals: Exploration of an elementary teacher’s practice in a math classroom. International Multilingual Research Journal, 19(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2024.2339757
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zhang, H., Ge, S., & Mohd Saad, M. R. B. (2024). Formative assessment in K–12 English as a foreign language education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(10), e31367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadek Dessy Desmiyani, Ni Luh Putu Eka Sulistia Dewi, Ni Putu Era Marsakawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
