THE POWER OF MIND MAPPING TO PRODUCE GOOD WRITING PRODUCT
The objective of this study was to find out the significant difference in writing achievement between the 11th grade students SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang who were taught by Mind Mapping technique and in that of those who were not. The second objective was to find out the improvement of the 11th grade students’ writing score at SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang after they were taught using Mind Mapping technique. The Quasi-experimental method through pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design was used in this study. The population was all of 11th grade natural science students at SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang in academic year 2018/2019. The total number of the population was 52 students in which they were divided into two classes as class 11.1 and 11.2. The sample was taken non-randomly. Class 11.1 was chosen as the experimental group and class 11.2 was chosen as the control group. The total number of the sample in the experimental group was 22 students. The test was administered twice as pretest and posttest. The results of the tests were analyzed by using paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test through SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) program.
Bukhari, S, S, F. 2016. Mind Mapping Technique to Enhance EFL Writing Skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication (IJLC). 4 (1):58-77.
Buzan, T. (2006). The Buzan Study Skills Handbook: The Shortcut to Success in Your Studies with Mind Mapping, Speed Reading and Winning Memory Techniques. Harlow: BBC Active.
Cahyono, B. Y. (2012). Techniques in Teaching EFL Writing. Malang: State
University of Malang Press.
Creswell, John. W. 2010. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Depdiknas. (2006). Kompetensi Dasar dan Standar Kompetensi Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas Republik Indonesia.
Fitria. 2016. Using the Mind MappingTechnique for Better Teaching of Writing in
English. English Education Journal (EEJ). 7(1): 16-28.
Hayes, D A. 1992. A Sourcebook of Interactive Methods for Teaching with Text. United States of America.
Hedge, Tricia. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyerle, D. 2008. Visual Tools for Transforming Information into Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Leo, Sutanto. 2007. English for Academic purpose: Essay Writing. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Sharples, Mike. 1999. How We Write. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian; Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta CV. Bandung: Indonesia.
Suyanto, A. 2015. The Effectiveness of Mind Mapping in Improving Students’ Writing Skill Viewed from Their IQ. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 2(2), 101-119.
Tompkins, G. E. 1994. Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Wallen, Norman E and Fraenkel, Jack R. 1991. Educational Research: A Guide to the Process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
White, R. and Arndt, V. 1991. Process Writing. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
Yan, Guo. 2005. A Process Genre Model for Teaching Writing. English Teaching Forum, 43 (3), 19-27.
Zainuddin, M. 2004. The Effect of Giving Feedback to Students’ Writing. TEFLIN Journal, 17(2):117-126.
Article StatisticAbstract view : 61 times
PDF views : 43 times
The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).
If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.
Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.
How To Cite This :
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature