Writing Toward the Workplace: Vocational Students’ Experience with LinkedIn in a Genre-Based Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.12309Keywords:
LinkedIn; vocational; writingAbstract
Writing job application letters remain a major challenge for vocational high school students in learning English as a foreign language. Students must use proper grammar, professional language, and genre appropriate writing style as they prepare to enter the workforce. This qualitative case study examines the use of LinkedIn as an authentic professional learning environment. This use shapes the writing process, classroom engagement, and the challenges students face. The study involved 31 of 11th-grade Hospitality students at a vocational high school in Yogyakarta over two genre-based learning cycles. Data were collected through classroom observations, interviews with students and teachers, and analysis of students’ writing drafts in order. Data were analysed thematically following Miles and Huberman’s interactive model. The study’s credibility was supported by triangulation of sources and time. Triangulation also included the investigator and theory. These procedures align with the five established criteria for the validity of action research found in the action research literature. The findings indicate that LinkedIn helped students’ progress from generic self-introductions to more organized and professional letters. Class participation increased, and students became more willing to revise their writing. Some students began to demonstrate an awareness of professional identity while reviewing authentic profiles. Students found that viewing real professional writing was more helpful for understanding formal vocabulary and organizing information than textbook exercises. But, the challenges remained in four areas. Linguistic and cognitive difficulties were reflected in limited grammar and trouble constructing coherent paragraphs. Technological and affective difficulties were reflected in unfamiliarity with the platform and limited peer feedback. These findings suggest that authentic digital platforms like LinkedIn can enrich writing instruction in vocational schools. These benefits are maximized when accompanied by ongoing support that addresses all four challenges together.
References
Aguado, D., García-Izquierdo, A. L., & Andres, J. C. (2019). LinkedIn "Big Four": Job performance validation in the ICT sector. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a7
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800304
Basturkmen, H. (2020). Teaching English for specific purposes. Routledge.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Damayanti, I. L., Abdurahman, N. H., & Wulandari, L. (2021). Collaborative writing and peer feedback practices using Google Docs. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.034
Diana, L. (2019). Students' ability in writing application letter at fourth semester ASM Persada Bunda Pekanbaru. English Journal of Indragiri, 3(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.32520/eji.v3i2.601
Gebril, A. (2021). Assessment myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press.
Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2018). Business communication: Process and product (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). The evaluation of ESL composition: A pragmatic framework. Newbury House Publishers.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.
Lina, M. (2022). Writing job application letter and resume with Google Document: An experimental research. Journal of English Teaching Applied Linguistics and Literatures (Jetall), 5(2), 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jetall.v5i2.14045
Liu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). A genre-based approach in the secondary school English writing class: Voices from student-teachers in the teaching practicum. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 992360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992360
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mutiti, Y. (2019). The art of persuasion: Pathetic appeal vis-à-vis ethical and logical considerations. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(10), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.610.7164
Nova, M., & Koerniawaty, F. (2021). Grammatical errors in students' application letters: A case study at IPB Internasional. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(4), 665–671. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i4.p665-671
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Rohayati, D. (2018). Moves analysis of application letters written by agribusiness students (A descriptive study at ESP class). JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i1.2184
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
van de Ven, N., Bogaert, A., Serlie, A., Brandt, M. J., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2017). Personality perception based on LinkedIn profiles. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(6), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2016-0220
Zaini, N., Aziz, A., Mohamad, N., Razali, N., Mohd Juned, A., & Azhar, S. (2022). Rhetorical appeals in professional communication presentation: An ODL setting. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i11/15674
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dini Majidah, Sari Hidayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
