Revisiting Herringbone-Scaffolded Reading A Statistical Reanalysis of EFL Learners’ Gains in Recount-Text Comprehension

Authors

  • Asni Dewi Cinta English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Indonesia
  • Sari Wulandari Universitas MuhaEnglish Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palummadiyah Palu, Indonesia
  • Dewi Rara Amiati English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.12647

Keywords:

Herringbone technique; reading comprehension; visual scaffolding; recount text; effect size

Abstract

This article revisits data from a quasi-experimental study of the Herringbone technique in reading instruction for eighth-grade EFL learners at MTs Negeri 1 Palu. Rather than repeating the original mean-score comparison, the study provides a transparent secondary statistical reanalysis of the student-level pre-test and post-test scores reported in the research record. Fifty-four students participated, with 27 students in the Herringbone group and 27 in the comparison group. The original instructional treatment was delivered across six meetings and used a visual Herringbone diagram to guide learners in identifying who, what, when, where, why, and how in recount texts. The reanalysis indicates that the Herringbone group increased from a mean of 41.85 to 72.22, whereas the comparison group increased from 44.44 to 60.92. The mean gain difference was 13.89 points. Based on the student-level scores listed in the source record, the independent-samples comparison of gain scores produced t(52) = 9.39, and the standardized between-group effect was very large (Cohen’s d = 2.55; Hedges’ g = 2.52). Normalized gain was 0.52 for the Herringbone group and 0.30 for the comparison group. These results strengthen the interpretation that the visual questioning framework was associated with substantially greater reading gains. The article also identifies a discrepancy between the t value reported in the original research record (2.353) and the value obtained from the listed student-level scores, highlighting the importance of transparent statistical reporting.

References

Amumpuni, R. S. (2021). The effect of the Herringbone technique on reading comprehension. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i1.2677

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Arnisa, A., Hente, M. A., & Arid, M. (2019). Meningkatkan pemahaman membaca siswa kelas delapan MTs Negeri 1 Palu melalui tekhnik Herringbone. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31934/jom.v1i1.639

Balajthy, E., & Wade, S. (2003). Struggling readers and the Herringbone strategy. In reading instruction and graphic organizers.

Brasell, D., & Rasinski, T. (2008). Comprehension that works: Taking students beyond ordinary understanding to deep comprehension. Shell Education.

Deegan, J. (2006). Herringbone technique. [Source cited in the original research record; full bibliographic details should be verified before submission.]

Desiana, K. (2018). Improving the reading comprehension ability through the use of Herringbone technique of XI grade students of SMA Negeri 11 Yogyakarta. English Language Teaching Journal, 7(6). https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/index.php/elt/article/view/13309

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Grellet, F. (1998). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge University Press.

Harwood, N. (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Maharani, A. A., Ariyani, A., & Asriati, A. (2024). Using Herringbone technique to improve students’ reading comprehension at SMPN 21 Makassar. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.26858/joeele.v3i4

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.

Masruddin, M., & Nur, M. I. (2026). Linguistics Landscape of Palopo City. Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 2025.

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Os, S., & Bae, J. (2024). A study on the effects of graphic organizer instruction on high school English learners’ reading comprehension abilities by Korean SAT question types, affective attitudes, and reading strategies. English Language Teaching, 36(4), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.17936/pkelt.2024.36.4.006

Rubin, D. (1993). A practical approach to teaching reading. Allyn & Bacon.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

Citation Check