Female Agency Through Bodily Autonomy: Resistance to Patriarchal Institutional Control in Level 16

Authors

  • Ni Kadek Anista Sari English Literature, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Juniartha English Literature, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i2.12782

Keywords:

female agency, bodily autonomy, patriarchal institutional control, feminist dystopia

Abstract

This study examines how female agency is manifested through bodily autonomy in Level 16 (2018) and how it enables resistance to patriarchal institutional control. Although previous studies have examined patriarchal oppression, institutional discipline, and female resistance in dystopian narratives, less attention has been given to bodily autonomy as a manifestation of female agency within institutional constraints. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze five purposively selected scenes, focusing on dialogue, character interactions, and visual representations. The analysis was guided by Ahearn’s (2001) theory of agency, supported by Foucault’s (1977) concept of disciplinary power and Mead’s (1934) concept of the self. The findings identify five manifestations of bodily autonomy: refusing institutional medication, rejecting medical intervention, reversing institutional control, rejecting institutional ownership of the female body, and reclaiming bodily autonomy through self-scarring. In the context of the film, these findings illustrate how Vivien’s actions challenge institutional authority and the commodification of women’s bodies. This study contributes to feminist film studies by interpreting bodily autonomy as a process through which female agency is exercised under patriarchal institutional constraints in Level 16 (2018).

Author Biography

I Wayan Juniartha, English Literature, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Dr. I Wayan Juniartha, S.S., M.Hum., is a lecturer at Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109

Almeida, C. (2025). Weaponizing women's bodies for authoritarian power: The Handmaid's Tale and anti-abortion politics in the USA. Via Panoramica: Revista de Estudos Anglo-Americanos, 14(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.21747/2182-9934/via14_1a6

Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.

Bhanbhro, S., Khaskheli, S., & Jatoi, M. A. (2025). From resilience to resistance: A feminist dystopian analysis of Before She Sleeps. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 3(3), 4947–4965. https://doi.org/10.71281/jals.v3i3.446

Carrasco-Carrasco, R. (2025). Vulnerable women and resistance in contemporary speculative TV in North America. Comparative American Studies, 22(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2025.2584254

Esterhazy, D. (Director). (2018). Level 16 [Film]. Dark Sky Films.

Fikri, A. A., & Rosida, I. (2022). Women body and its functions in dystopian literature: Sexual commodity, sexual pleasure, and reproductive nature. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 15(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v15i2.17913

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Güleşce, Ü. (2023). The biopower and biopolitics concepts and reflections of them on women in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, 6(2), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.33708/ktc.1312679

Ismael, H. S., & Saleh, H. M. (2023). The discursive strategies of power and female resistance in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale: A Foucauldian reading. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 11(3), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2023.11.3.1096

Juliartha, K. R., Juniartha, I. W., Putra, I. G. B. W. N., & Erawan, D. G. B. (2026). Wacana penghancuran diri perempuan sebagai bentuk perlawanan stereotip dalam Sagra (2023) karya Oka Rusmini. SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik dan Sastra, 18(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v18i1.13603

Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford University Press.

Matek, L. (2026). Alteration until annihilation: Biopolitical aspects of beautification in The Substance. Anafora, 13(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.29162/ANAFORA.v13i1.3

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.

Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., Arnold, M. F., & Faber, N. S. (2025). The moralization of women's bodies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 55(1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3136

Muhammad, L. (2025). The politics of the body: Sexuality, shame, and bodily autonomy in postcolonial feminist texts. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(4), 5853–5865. https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.04.1417

Nie, Z., & Kaur, H. (2025). Transcending constraints: Female bodily discipline and resistance in Han Kang's The Vegetarian. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 19(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v19i1.3641

Sanjaya, A., & Fitriana, E. N. (2026). Patriarchal resistance of female characters in There's Still Tomorrow (2023). Journal of English Language and Education, 11(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i3.2494

Shubha, P., & Rebecca, S. C. (2024). Beauty and the Beast: Tracing patriarchal panopticism in Louise O’Neill’s Only Ever Yours. The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies, 31, e8604. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v31.8604

Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (3rd ed.). Westview Press.

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-12

Citation Check