Junior Students’ Self-Regulation Strategies in Dealing with Assignments
One of the courses in English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University is Play Performance Course. In this course, students work in groups. Students needs to plan, monitor, and evaluate their works. Those activities are considered as self-regulated activities. This research provides an issue to discuss: To what extent do the junior students use self-regulation strategies in dealing with assignments? This study intends to describe self-regulation strategies used by the junior students of the study program. The researcher used in depth-interview as the medium of data gathering. The participants of the research were the students of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University who had taken Play Performance Class in the third year. They came from batch 2015. The result shows that they use four, instead of five, self-regulation strategies. Independence learning as the characteristic of activities played important role in divining such activities in order to enhance their cognitive and other aspects. This research might help the students of English Language Education Study Program to modify their strategies in learning, especially in dealing with their assignments.
Asmarani, R., & Ratnawati, J. (2020). Encouraging English Language Use through the “Desaku” Project. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 410-425. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1580
Suwandi, E., & Wafa, K. (2020). Developing English Syllabus for Pharmacy Students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 426-434. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1598
Anderson, LW & Krathwohl, DR. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, Longman,
Arens, K., Swaffar, J. (2000). Reading Goals and the Standards for Foreign Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals (33), 104-122.
Averil, J. (2001). The Rhetoric of Emotion, with a Note on What Makes Great Literature Great. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19 (1), 5-26.
Bagherkazemi M., Alemi, M. (2010). Literature in the EFL/ESL Classroom: Consensus and Controversy. LiBRI. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 1 (1), 1-12.
Bandura, A. (1977) Social learning theory. New York, General Learning Press.
Bandura, A, Harackiewicz, J, & Kihlstrom, J. (1999). An Evolutionary Milestone in the Psychology of Personality’, Psychological Inquiry, vol.1, pp. 86-92.
Bhatia HR. (1986). Elements of Educational Psychology, Bombay
Bhatia HR. (1997). A text book of Educational Psychology, N. Delhi.
Black, P, Harrison, C, Lee, C, Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom, Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 86, issue 1, and pp.8-21.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Boekaerts, M, & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 54, pp. 199-231.
Boekaerts, M, De Koning, E, & Vedder,. (2006). Goal directed behaviour and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals’, Educational Psychologist, vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 33-51.
Bonwell, CC, & Eison, JA (1991), Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, September, retrieved October 19, 2017.
Brophy, J E. (1998), Motivating students to learn, McGraw-Hill, Boston MA.
Brown, J S, Collins, A & Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning’, Educational Researcher, vol.18, issue 1, pp.32- 41.
Carroli, P. (2008). Literature in Second Language Education. London and New York: Continuum.
Carroli, P. (2002). Perceptions of Literature: A Comparison of Students’ and Educators’ Views. Proceedings of Innovations in Italian teaching workshop (pp.113-128). Griffith: Griffith University.
Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P., & Loughlin, S. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409.
Donovan, S Bransford, J & Pellegrino, J 1999, How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy of Sciences, retrieved October 19, 2017.
Dresel, M & Haugwitz, M. (2005) ‘The relationship between cognitive abilities and selfregulated learning: Evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender’, High Ability Studies, vol.16, issue 2, pp. 201-218.
Eggen, P & Kauchak, D. (2003), Educational psychology: windows in classrooms, Merrill. Columbus, Ohio.
Ewell, P. T. and D. P. Jones (1996), Indicators of “Good Practice” in undergraduate education: A Handbook for Development and Implementation, National Centre for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), Boulder.
Fink, LD. (1999), Active learning. Faculty Guide, retrieved October 19, 2017.
Grant, H. (2005). ‘A case study of students’ perceptions of goal setting as a tool for learning’, Kairaranga, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 22-28.
Grayson, TE. (2003). focus groups workshop, retrieved November 13,2017 .
Hambleton, R. K. et al. (2005), Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-cultural Assessment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah.
Harris, K. & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic inter-vention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disabil-ity Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
Hofer, BK, Yu, SL & Pintrich, P. (1998). ‘Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners’ in DH Schunk & BJ Zimmerman (eds), Self-regulated learning from teaching to self-reflective practice, The Guidford Press. New York, pp. 57-85.
Jaeger, R. (1978), “About Educational Indicators”, Review of Research in Education, Vol. 6, pp. 276-315. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont.
Kerlin, BA. (1992). Cognitive engagement style, self-regulated learning and cooperative learning, retrieved October 19, 2017
Kim, B. (2008). Social constructivism, retrieved November 15, 2017.
King, M, Sims, A & Osher, D, 2008, How is cultural competence integrated in education? Retrieved October 19, 2017
Kuh, G. D. (2002), The College Student Report (4th ed), National Survey of Student Engagement, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Laing, J., R. Sawyer, and J. Noble (1988), Accuracy of Self-Reported Activities and Accomplishments of College-bound Students, Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 29(4), Alexandria.
Marzano, Robert J. (2000). Transforming Classroom Grading. Alexandria: ASCD. Print.
Moffett, James, and Betty Jane Wagner. (1992). Student-Centred Language Arts, K–12. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook. Print.
National Governors Association Centre for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington: National Governors Association Centre for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Print.
Paris, S. & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psy-chology, 36, 89-101
Reeves, Douglas B. (2009). Leading to Change/Effective Grading Practices. Educational Leadership 65.5: 85–87. Web. 23 June 2017.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge grows in teaching. In Educational Researcher, Vol. 15, No. 2, 4-14.
Van Vught, F. (2008), Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education, Higher Education Policy, Vol. 21(2), pp. 151-174, CHEPS, Eschede.
Van Vught, F. (Ed.) (2009), Mapping the Higher Education Landscape: Towards a European Classification of Higher Education, Springer, Dordrecht.
Van Vught, F. et al. (2008), Mapping Diversity: Developing a European Classification of Higher Education, CHEPS, Eschede.
Wormeli, Rick. (2006). Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessing and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom. Portland: Stenhouse. Print.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29–36.
Article StatisticAbstract view : 44 times
PDF views : 85 times
How To Cite This :
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Laurentius Krisna Septa Bernanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.