The Influence of Twitter Media Exposure on the Language Attitude of Students at Brawijaya University

Uswatun Hasanah(1*), Ika Nurhayani(2), Nurul Chojimah(3)
(1) Universitas Brawijaya
(2) 
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1783

Abstract

The S-O-R theory by Hovland, et.al (1953) states that organisms produce certain behaviors if there are special stimulus conditions, so that one can expect and estimate the compatibility between messages and communicant reactions (Effendy, 2005: 254). Twitter exposure can affect various aspects of the lives of its users, one of which is in the aspect of language attitudes. Language attitude is defined as the subjective perception of language influenced by behaviors. This research aims to analyze the effect of twitter exposure on language attitude of college students in Brawijaya University. This research is quantitative research. The data were collected using a questionnaire, from the results of the questionnaire were analyzed to determine the effect of each variable calculated using regression analysis. To convert data from questionnaires into numerical data that can be analysed, a Likert scale is used. This study shows the influence of twitter media exposure (X) on language attitude (Y) is significant. In addition, t value is -10.771 which means that the influence is inversely proportional, the more twitter media exposure increase, language attitude will decrease. This means that H0 is rejected, so it can be concluded that language attitude (Y) can be significantly influenced.

Keywords


1; language attitude 2; stimulus response theory 3; twitter media exposure

References


Sulistyani, S., & Riwayatiningsih, R. (2020). Modeling Online Classroom Interaction to Support Student Language Learning. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 446-457. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1610

Astia, I. (2020). The Analysis of Phonology in First Language Acquisition Melayu Pattani in Children Three-Year-Old. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 435-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1601

Ambarwati, R., Nurkamto, J., & Santosa, R. (2019). Phatic and politeness on women’s communication in Facebook: Humanistic teaching perspective of being polite in social media. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.326

Badari, A., Setyowati, A., & Widisanti, N. M. (2019). An analysis of features and function in women’s speech in the talk show United Stated of Women Summit. Journal Albion, 1(1), 1–11.

Bennett, M., & Jarvis, J. (2010). The communicative function of minimal responses in everyday conversation. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(4), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9713882

Coates, J. (1996). Women talk: Conversation between women friends. Blackwell.

Coates, J. (2013). Women, men, and language (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks.

DeFrancisco, V. (1991). The sound of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society, 2(4), 413–423.

Fishman, P. M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.2307/800492

Freed, A. F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90101-5

Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.

Holmes, J. (1984). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman. https://doi.org/10.2307/416031

Holmes, J. (1998). Women’s talk: The question of Sociolinguistic universals. Australian Journal of Communication, 20(3), 125–149.

Indra, R. A., Marnita, R., & Ayumi, A. (2019). Linguistics features of three British female beauty Youtubers. Vivid Journal of Language and Literature, 7(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.25077/vj.7.1.22-34.2018

Jakobsson, S. (2010). A study of female language features in same - sex conversation. In Hogskoan I Gavle (Issue September).

Jesperson, O. (1922). Language: Its nature, development and origin. George Allen & Unwin.

Jumaa, A., Mohammed, T., Elfakki, M., & Hilal, H. (2019). A glance at face to face conversation system: With special reference to turn-taking strategies. International Journal of ELT, Linguistics and Comparative Literature, 7(5), 1–10.

Keshavarz, M. H., & Asit, G. (2020). Pragmatic features of the Speech Act of compliment in a Turkish TV drama. 02(01), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i1.1-25

Krisdiyanta, N. (2019). Compliments in the educational institutions: Compliments among Indonesian students of English Department. International Journal of Humanities Studies, 3(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2019.030110

Lakoff, R. (2004). Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries - Robin Lakoff, Robin Tolmach Lakoff - Google Books. In New York.

Leaper, C. (2019). Young adults’ conversational strategies during negotiation and self-disclosure in same-gender and mixed-gender friendships. Sex Roles, 81(9), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1014-0

Macintyre, P. D. (2019). Anxiety/uncertainty management and communication accommodation in women’s brief dyadic conversations with a stranger: An idiodynamic approach. 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861482

Makejeva, M. (2017). Hedging and politeness strategies used by native and non-native English speaking females in academic settings. Lithuanian University.

Namaziandost, E., & Shafiee, S. (2018). Gender differences in the use of Lexical hedges in academic spoken language among Iranian EFL learners: A comparative study. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(4), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.4.63

Norrick, N. R. (2012). Listening practices in English conversation: The responses responses elicit. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(5), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.007

Oktapiani, T., Natsir, M., & Setyowati, R. (2017). Women’s language features found in female character’s utterances in the Devil Wears Prada movie. Jurnal Imu Budaya, 1(3), 207–220.

Pebrianti, A. (2013). Women’s language features used by Indonesian female bloggers. Passage, 1(2), 109–118.

Rahmawati, D., Citralesmana, E., & Indriyani, L. (2019). Women language features in recode world’s technology conference : A Sociolinguistic studies. 6(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v6i2.3122

Rosanti, E. D., & Jaelani, A. (2009). The use of lexical hedges in spoken language by female and male students. 29–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32832/english

Sartini, N. (2019). Compliment response strategy of Balinese women on social media. 338(Prasasti), 373–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/prasasti-19.2019.64

Schilling-Estes, N., Trudgill, P., Cheshire, J., Cheshire, J., & Trudgill, P. (1998). The Sociolinguistics reader. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/417748

Setyorini, L., & Indarti, Y. (2008). Conversational strategies in same-sex talk : An interview article of O’ The Oprah Magazine. University of Airlangga.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zaghlool, Z., & Yahia, H. (2020). Saudi women’s speech as a gender identity marker in mixed-gender informal interaction : A case study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 1–18.

Zunaidah, A., Sari, Y. K. P., & Kumalasari, R. D. (2020). Hedges, politeness Strategies, and power. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 3(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v3i1.107


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 30 times
PDF views : 45 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Uswatun Hasanah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.