HOW ERRORS MADE IN ESSAY WRITING: AN ANALYSIS USING GRAMMARLY SOFTWARE IN EFL STUDENTS

Ismawati Ismawati(1*), Erwin Akib(2), Arief Muhsin(3)
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1815

Abstract

Errors in writing are naturally made in EFL teaching. This research aimed to find out the errors of correctness, clarity, engagement, delivery, and plagiarism in student essay writing using Grammarly Software in the third semester of English education. This research conducted at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. The researcher used the descriptive quantitative method. The participants were 21 students from the third semester at English education of University Muhammadiyah of Makassar. The study took sample by apply purposive sampling. The instrument of this research is the students’ essay writing. The research results found 452 errors based on Grammarly software made by the third semester in English education at University Muhammadiyah of Makassar. Those errors can classify as follow: 73.5% errors of correctness, 17.5% errors of clarity, 7.7 % errors of engagement, 1.3% errors of delivery, and 0% errors of plagiarism.

Keywords


Error; Grammarly; software; and writing

References


Bungin. (2005). MetodePenelitianKuantitatif.Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.

Brown, H. Douglas, 2000. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Canh, L. Van. (2016). Key issues in language teaching [Book Review]. English Australia Journal, 32(1), 113–116.

Fadhilah, U., Julia, H., & Saribu, D. (2019). Effectiveness of Grammarly Application for Writing English Abstract. 8(12), 163–166.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8

Karim, A., Mohamed, A. R., Ismail, S. A. M. M., Shahed, F. H., Rahman, M. M., & Haque, M. H. (2018). Error Analysis in EFL Writing Classroom. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 122.

Karyuatry, L. (2018). Grammarly as a Tool to Improve Students’ Writing Quality: Free Online-Proofreader across the Boundaries. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 2(1), 83.

Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error analysis and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 1027–1032.

Ramli, D., Suhartono, L., & Novita, D. (2013). AN ANALYSIS ON THE STUDENTS’ERROR IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 2(2).

Saepuloh, A. (2018). Students’ Responses on the Use of Grammarly Application in an Efl Writing Class. The 1st International Conference on ELT (CONELT), 1(1), 1–5.

Vidhiasi, D. M., & Haryani, H. (2020). The Implementation of Grammarly In Error Analysis Implementasi Grammarly Dalam Error Analysis. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Maritim, 21(1), 17.

Yulianti, E. (2018). Utilizing Grammarly in Teaching Writing Recount Text Through Genre Based Approach. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 6(1), 1.

Yuninan, E. D., & Isnani, Z. (2020). the Effectiveness of Spatial Order in Writing a Descriptive Text. E-Link Journal, 7(1), 1.


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 39 times
PDF views : 70 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ismawati Ismawati, Erwin Akib, Arief Muhsin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.