Is Face-to-Face Learning Better than Online Learning? Teachers’ voice on the Use of Google Workspace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2176Keywords:
Google Workspace, Google Application, Distance LearningAbstract
The study focused on teachers’ voices on the use of Google Workspace (G-Workspace) for education amidst the pandemic. The objects of the study were seven participants. All the participants were teachers at Universitas Muslim Maros. The data was collected using a structured interview. The collected data was analysed using Miles and Huberman’s analysis. The result showed that from the perspectives of teachers, G-Workspace had been used as a group of applications to portray the real offline classroom. The most used applications were G-classroom, G-Meet and G-Mail. Unfortunately, there were some unpopular applications such as G-Calendar and G-Jamborad. G-Workspace promotes integrated applications and collaborative learning. From the result, the integration of the applications gave advantages to the participants as they could open some applications through G-Classroom. Meanwhile, working collaboratively was not the best option as the result of the lack of knowledge on collaborative online learning as well as the incompatible device from students. Notwithstanding, G-Workspace had helped most participants to achieve their learning objectives and they referred to it as helpful applications for learning. However, some participants believed that even though G-Workspace had been a medium for distance learning, they were not able to ensure students’ understanding of the material. Therefore, they chose face-to-face learning as the best way to deliver the teaching material
References
Awuah, L. J. (2015). Supporting 21st-Century Teaching and Learning: The Role of Google Apps for Education (GAFE). Journal of Instructional Research, 4, 12-22.
Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(3), 101-108.
Bušelić, M. (2012). Distance Learning–Concepts and Contributions. Oeconomica Jadertina, 2(1), 23-34.
Callaway, S. K. (2012). Implications of Online Learning: Measuring Student Satisfaction and Learning for Online and Traditional Ttudents. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 2. Distance Education, 35(3), 345-359.
Google Support (2021) Retrieved from https://support.google.com/a/answer/7370133?hl=en
Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ Motivation in Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic Era: A Case Study. HOLISTICS, 12(2).
Honeyman, M. & Miller, G. (1993) Agriculture Distance Education: A Valid Alternative for Higher Education? Proceedings of the 20th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Meeting (67 – 73)
Jang, H. W., & Kim, K. J. (2014). Use of Online Clinical Videos for Clinical Skills Training for Medical Students: Benefits and Challenges. BMC medical education, 14(1), 1-6.
Khojasteh, L., Karimian, Z., Nasiri, E., Sharifzadeh, S., & Farrokhi, M. R. (2021). E-learning-Based Medical Education during COVID19 Pandemic From Medical Students' Viewpoints. Research Square. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-234844/v1
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mobo, D. F. D. (2021). Effectiveness Of Asynchronous Distance Learning Amidst The New Normal. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2(12), 54-56.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
Lindh, M., Nolin, J., & Hedvall, N. K. (2016). Pupils in The Clouds: Implementation of Google Apps for Education. First Monday
Owayid, A. M., & Uden, L. (2014, September). The usage of Google apps services in higher education. In International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (pp. 95-104). Springer, Cham.
Romero, E., Artal-Sevil, J., Mir, J., & Artacho, J. (2018, March). Improving Learning through G Suite for Education. Use of ‘Google Universe’Apps in the Classroom. In Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain (pp. 5-7).
Sudarsana, I. K., Putra, I. B. M. A., Astawa, I. N. T., & Yogantara, I. W. L. (2019). The Use of Google Classroom in The Learning Process. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1175, No. 1, p. 012165). IOP Publishing.
Thach, P., Lai, P., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Online Learning Amid Covid-19 Pandemic: Students' Experience and Satisfaction. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 39-48.
Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building Student Trust in Online Learning Environment. Distance Education, 35(3), 345- 359.
Yaumi, M. (2007). The Implementation of Distance Learning in Indonesian Higher Education. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 10(2), 196-215.
Zdraveski, D., Janeska, M., Sotiroski, K., & Manceski, G. (2020). Student’s Perceptions on Benefits and Challenges of Using Google Cloud-Based Tools for E-Learning. Proceedings of the 1st international conference Economic and Business Trends Shaping the Future. 1(1), 260-271.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)