The Teachers’ Corrective Feedbacks on the Students’ Grammatical Errors in their Written Descriptive Text and Their Response.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2694Keywords:
grammatical error, corrective feedback, descriptive textAbstract
    Â
This study aimed to find out (1) The teachers’ feedbacks on the students’ grammatical errors in the students’ descriptive text; (2) The students’ responses towards the teachers’ grammatical feedbacks in their descriptive text. The research design is Descriptive Qualitative Research conducted at SMP 1 Ma’rang Pangkep.   The subject of research was three English teachers and thirty students who were selected by Purposive Sampling Technique. The instrument of data collected were teachers’ corrective feedback and the student’s response from the descriptive text. The result of the research showed that corrective feedback on the students’ grammatical errors in descriptive texts was more dominant in syntax errors, in this case mis formation errors. These errors occurred because of student’s mother tongue interference. The students still confused to choose the right word in a sentence because of the lack of knowledge or poor vocabularies and its used. Besides that, some students tried to translate the words one by one from Indonesian language into English without paying attention to the English structure rules. Students’ response by imitating the teacher's corrective feedback. Because they were aware that the parts which were given feedback were incorrect and they agreed with the correction suggested by the teacher. Thus, they directly imitated the corrections and did not change any other parts. And a few students ignore.
References
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearsong Education Press.
Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: principles andclassroom practice (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The Basic. New York, USA: Routhledge.
Larsen-Freeman (2011). A Complexity Theory Approach to Second Language Development / Acquisition. University of Michigan
Mareta (2018). Corrective Feedback in English Class. Center of Language and
Culture Studies, 3(3), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijotl-
tl.v3i3.502
Maria. (2017). Kesalahan Leksikal dan Akurasi dalam Peulisan Bahasa Asing Inggris. Masalah Multibahasa.
Nassaji - Science & Education, 2019 - Springer
Pawlak, (2014). “Error Correction in the Foreign Language Classroom†Spinger Link.
Rassai, E., & Moinzadeh, A. (2011). Investigating the Effects of Three Types of Corrective Feedback on the Acquisition of English Wh-question Forms by Iranian EFLLearners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 97-106.
Royani, M. (2019). The implementation of local wisdom-based learninf and hots-
based assessment: Teacher survey in Banjarmasin. Jurnal pendidikan
biologi Indonesia. 5(3): halaman 407-414.
Sulistyawati, A. D. 2011. Asuhan Kebidanan Pada Ibu Bersalin. Jakarta: alemba Medika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)