Applying REAP (Read, Encode, Annotate, Ponder) Learning Method to Improve the Students’ Reading Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2937Keywords:
REAP Learning Method, Reading LiteracyAbstract
This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted at SDN 104 Wiwitan which aims to improve students' reading literacy of class V in Indonesian learning through the REAP learning method. The sample of this research is 30 students in academic year 2021/2022. The instruments used to get the data are observation and test. Data analysis used quantitative and qualitative descriptive statistics. The result of this research showed that the average value of students in the first cycle was 51% with a classical learning percentage of 13%, and in the second cycle the average value obtained by students was 85% with a percentage of 93%. Judging from these data, it can be concluded that there is an enhancement in students' reading literacy in Indonesian learning after they being taught using REAP (Read, Encode, Annotae, Ponder) method, where from cycle I to cycle II it increased by 34%.
References
Abidin, Y. (2016). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Abidin, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arifin. (2011). Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitataif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Arikunto. (2017). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Atmazaki. (2013). Mengungkap Masa Depan: Inovasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Konteks Pengembangan Karakter Cerdas. Makalah. Padang: UNP.
Djamarah, B, S.(2008). Psikologi Belajar Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Hanggi & Herlina, O. (2016). “Tiga Perubahan Kecil dalam Literasi Sekolahâ€. Membumikan Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Ladang Kata
Hanifah, N. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Bandung: UPI Press.
Harsiati, T. & Priyatni, E. T. (2017). Karakteristik Tes Literasi Membaca pada Programme for International Student Asessment (PISA). BIBLIOTIKA: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi.
Lulu, L, P. (2020). Pengaruh Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Jigsaw di kelas IV SDN 251 Sakti Desa Tanarigella Kecamatan Bua Kabupaten Luwu. A Thesis. Palopo: Cokrominoto Palopo University.
Made, Wena (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Malawi, Ibadullah & Maruti, Sri Endang . (2016). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jawa Timur: CV. AE Media Gravika ISBN: 978-60271698-7-6.
Purwanto, Ngalim. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukardi. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Tindakan Kelas: Implementasi dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tierney, R. J. & John, E. R. (1990). Reading Strategis and Practies-A Compendium. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Wulandari & Dessy N. (2013). “Teaching Reading Comprehensions To The Eighth Graders Of SMP Negeri 53 Palembang Through Reading, Encoding, Annotating, Pendering (REAP) Strategiâ€. A Thesis. Palembang: Sriwijaya University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)