Analysis of Students' Understanding in Using Rhetorical Moves on Thesis Abstract

Agung Suhadi(1*)
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3042

Abstract

This paper presents the study of rhetorical moves on thesis abstracts of accounting students at the Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. The motive of this research is to examine how far students' understanding is in using rhetorical moves in their thesis abstracts. Under the qualitative descriptive method, 20 abstracts are taken randomly based on the thesis abstract, which was being proofread at Language Center Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu, 2021. Data were further discussed in the light of rhetorical moves by Swales. Based on the results of the analysis, this study revealed different forms of rhetorical moves; the highest sequence and frequency on Move 3 (research method) and Move 4 (results) were 100% occurrences according to Jhon Swales' concept. Furthermore, move 2 (research aim) has a higher sequence and frequency, it was 80% occurrence. Unsimilar, move 1 (situating research) and Move 5 (conclusion) as the smallest sequence and are frequent due to the abstracts not correctly presenting some steps of rhetorical moves as proposed by Swales. To sum up, this study has set out the findings; mostly accounting students have followed the rhetorical moves in their thesis abstracts on Move 3 and Move 4. However, their understanding of Move 1 and 5 must be revised for generating better abstracts.

Keywords


abstracts, accounting, rhetorical move, students, thesis.

References


Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical organization of tourism research article abstracts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 269-281.

Andika, Rosyi Putri. at. all. (2018). Rhetorical Moves And Linguistic Features Of Journal Article Abstracts By Postgraduate Students, National And International Authors In Applied Linguistics.Journal Of Applied Linguistics And Literature.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993), Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Cakir, H., & Fidan, Ö. (2015). A Contrastive Study of the Rhetorical Structure of Turkish and English Research Article Abstracts. In Denis Zeyrek, et al. (eds.), Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics (pp. 367–378). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

Connor, U., Upton, T. A., Kanoksilpatham, B. (2007). Introduction to moving analysis. In Biber, D., Connor, U., Upton, T. A. (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 23-41). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Doró, K. (2013). The Rhetoric Structure of Research Article Abstracts in English Studies Journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2, (1), 119–139.

Dos Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of the research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary. Journal of Language, Discourse &Communication Studies, 16, (4), 481–499. doi.10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481.

Graetz, N. (1985). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ulign, & A.K.

Halliday, M. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.

Hopkins, A. & Dudley-Evans, A. (1988). A Genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertation. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-122.

Kafes, H. (2012). Cultural Traces on the Rhetorical Organization of Research Article Abstracts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3, (3), 207–220.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for specific Purposes, 24, 269–292.

Karmila, Malikatul Laila (2020). Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts: Investigating Abstracts Thesis of English Education Department Students in Surakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, Vol 21. No 2.

Keshavarz, M. H., and_Atai, M. R & Barzgar, V. (2007). A contrastive study of the generic organization of research article organizations written by Iranian and non-Iranian writers. Applied linguistics, TELL, 1(2), 13-33.

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to the thematic organization. English for specific Purposes, 23, (3), 280–302. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001.

Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging SocialReality.Deakin: University Press.

Nga, Nguyen Thi Hong. (2009). Academic English at Tertiary Level: What, Why, How. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign languages 25 (2009) 112-117. Retrieved from http://www.js.vnu.edu.vn/nn_2_09/b6.pdf.

Nurul Luthfianda, Sahira, Kurniawan E, Gunawan (2021). Rhetorical Structures of Introductions in Soft And Hard Science International Journals Written By Indonesian Scholars. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. 6(2). August 2021.

Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10, (2), 231–250. doi: 10.1177/1461445607087010.

_________. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). (2010). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Piqué-Noguera, C. (2012). Content and Form in English Business Abstracts and Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Genre Approach. Valencia: Universitat de València; PhD dissertation.

Purves, A.C. (1988). Writing Across Languages and Cultures: Issues in Contrastive Rhetoric. Newbury park, CA: Sage.

Samraj, B. (2002). Disciplinary variation in abstracts: The case of wildlife behavior and conservation biology. In John Flowerdew. (ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 40–56). New York: Longman.

Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research Article Abstracts in Two Related Disciplines: Rhetorical Variation between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. English LanguageTeaching, 6, (2), 84–99. doi: 10.5539/elt.v6n2p84.

Suryani, Ina, et al (2013) Rhetorical Structure in Academic Research Writing by Non-Native Writers.International Journals of Higher Education, vol.3 no.1: November 2014

Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, England: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Tavakoli Gheinani, M., & Tabatabaei, O. (2017). A structural move analysis of the abstract section of ISI articles of Iranian and native scholars in agricultural engineering. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(3), 109– 122. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2017.1864


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 58 times
PDF views : 69 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Agung Suhadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.