The Community Manipulation through Big Brother’s Tyranny in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four

Devi Ismayanti(1*), Andi Tenrisanna Syam(2)
(1) English Language Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Palopo
(2) English Language Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Palopo
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3445

Abstract

This research aimed on some instruments or agencies that implemented in constracting the community engineering in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four, describe the logic used and present the community engineering carried out the novel. The writer then uses library research and sosiology literature as method in analyzing the novel. The data were collected by using note taking technique which exists in Nineteen Eighty-Four accord with the pages. Then, all the quotation classified and analyzed based on the case that had beeen arround by each moment/event in that novel. After doing the considerable study, the writer finds basically the bad effect of human engineering to the society. The over control by agents were bringing individuals’ loss of human nature and a critical thinking faculty and the diminished capacity for self expression. So, finally the human being is not exists as a human with high level values, in fact in this novel, human is less than the animal.

Keywords


Agencies, Rules and Policies, Human Engineering

References


Babiak, P. D. &Hare, R. (2011). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work.Accessed on 22nd December 2011.

Bass, B. (1990). from Transactional to Transformational Leadership:Learning to Share the Vision. OrganizationalDynamics Winter.

B, Kurnia. (2008). Totalitarianism in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Makassar: Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Hasanuddin University.

Bell, Wendell. 1997. Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for aNew Era. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Transaction Publishers.

Bentham, J. (1832).Cacotopia (κακos, bad, wicked). Refers to Chris Hill 2. Accessed on 9th December 2011.

Casanova, Pascale. (2004). The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cohn, Majorie. (2008). “Understanding, responding to and Preventing Terrorism.” Arab Studies Quarterly 25.

Coleman, J. (2000)."Copenhagen police detain 968 in climate change rally". A History of Political Thought: From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance.Blackwell Publishers; Oxford. Accessedon 2nd January 2012.

Dromi, S. M. Illouz, E. (2011).Recovering Morality: Pragmatic Sociology and LiteraryStudies. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/new_literary_history/v041/41.2.dromi.html.Wordnet.princeton.edu. Accessed on 26th December 2011.

Fromm, E. (1961). "Afterword" to Nineteen Eighty-Four, pp. 324–337. New York:Plume.

Futterman, S. (2011). When You Work for a Bully: Assessing Your Options and Taking Action. Accessed on 23rd June 2011.

Galtung, J.,& Inayatullah, S. (1997). Macrohistory and Macrohistorians. Westport, Ct: Praeger.

Greene, R. (2011). The 48 Laws of Power.Accessed on 5th June 2011.

Gersh, D. (1992).‘Covering solid waste issues.’Editor & Publisher 125(29 August): 15-6.

Griswold, W. (2011).Recent Moves in the Sociology of Literature.Annual Review ofSociology, 19, 455–467. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.002323. Accessed on 5th December 2011.

Harper, D., & Runion, M. (2009).Utopia. Online Etymology Dictionary.http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Utopia. Retrieved 2009-05-24.How to Use Power Phrases to Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say, & Get What You Want, Accessed on 3rd December 2011.

Holland, N. N. (2004). The Power of Literature: A Neuropsychological View.New Literary History.

Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R., &Matteson, M. (2007). Organizational Behavior and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and Opportunities in Agenda-Setting Research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 100-120. Accessed on 9th December 2011.

Kouzes, J. M.,& Posner, B. Z. (1987).The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Lee, M.A., & Solomon, N.(1990).Unreliable Sources: A guide to detecting bias in news media. New York: Carol Publishing Group.

Lothamer, N. (2011). Dancing in the Shadow of Tyranny: An Activist's Guide to Inner Disarmament.Accessed on 2nd January 2012.

Market House Books. (2000). A Dictionary of World History. Oxford: UniversityPress.

Masini, E. (1993). Why Futures Studies? London, UK: Grey Seal Books.

M, Linda. (2011). Humiliation and Assistance: Telling the Truth About Power, Telling a New Story. Hartling, Wellesley College.Accessed on 3rd January 2012.

M, Shapiro., Ronal. A., Jankowski, M., Dale, J. (2011).Bullies, Tyrants, and Impossible People: How to Beat Them Without Joining Them. Accessed on 14th November 2011.

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. "Appendix: The Principles of Newspeak", pp. 309–323. New York: Plume, 2003.

Orwell, G. (1983). Nineteen-Eighty-Four. In association with Martin&Warburg: Penguin Books Ltd.

Parrott, Les. (2011). Imperative People: Those Who Must Be in Control. Accessed on27th January 2012.

Parrott, L. (2011).The Control Freak.Accessed on 7th November 2011

Pynchon, T. (2003). "Foreword to the Centennial Edition" to Nineteen Eighty-Four, pp. vii.xxvi. New York: Plume.

Rohrbeck, R. (2010).Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the FutureOrientation of a Firm, Springer Series: Contributions to Management Science. Heidelberg, and New York.

Rohrbeck, R.& H.G. Gemuenden. (2010).Corporate Foresight: Its Three Roles in Enhancing theInnovation Capacity of a Firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, forthcoming.


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 46 times
PDF views : 43 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Devi Ismayanti, Andi Tenrisanna Syam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.