The Phenomenon of Pragmatic Markers in Daily Conversations Among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i2.5610Keywords:
pragmatic markers, college students, communication, social context, language teachingAbstract
This study explored pragmatic markers (PMs) used by college students in casual interactions. Understanding the prevalence, range, frequency, diversity, social context and functions of PMs, were the goals of the study. A qualitative descriptive method was used to examine nine student discussions. Participants were chosen at random from the Faculty of Education, Zuwila, Sebha University, Libya. Conversations in casual environments, such as residences and cafeterias, were discreetly recorded. PMs were found and grouped according to their function and social environment using thematic analysis. The results of the investigation showed that PMs were highly prevalent in all areas, including social interactions, agreement, and admiration. Pupils used a wide spectrum of PMs; the social milieu affected the frequency and variety of use. A greater variety of PMs were utilized in informal contexts for relationship development, emotional expression, and social navigation. The study's overall findings emphasize how important PMs are to student communication. These indicators are more than just filler words; they are vital resources that help students interact with others, communicate clearly, and form relationships. This study adds to a more comprehensive understanding of PM usage in regular student conversations.
References
Alkhawaja, H. W., Paramasivam, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Kasim, Z. M. (2023). Pragmatic
markers used by Arab postgraduate students in classroom oral presentations. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 140-155. https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/6759
Al-Saidat, E. M., Kreishan, L. J., & Abbadi, R. M. (2024). The pragmatic functions of using the expression mayyɪt ‘dead’ in Jordanian spoken Arabic. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.31
AlShraah, S. M., Aly, E. M. S., & Mohd Nasim, S. (2024). Pragmatic realization in exploiting request expressions: A study of language proficiency and social context among Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 412-426. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2013758.3233
Aijmer, K. (2016). Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause (pp. 29–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.02aij
Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2011). Pragmatic markers. Discursive pragmatics, 8,223-247. http://digital.casalini.it/9789027289155
Arya, T. (2020). Exploring discourse marker use in Thai university students' conversations.
LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 247-267.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, B. A., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M. J., & Reynolds, D. W. (1991).
Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45(1), 4-15.
Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative descriptive approach inhealth care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some language universals in language use.Cambridge University Press.
Caprario, M., Taguchi, N., & Reppen, R. (2022). Corpus-informed instruction of the pragmatic marker I mean. The Language Learning Journal, 50(4), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2088439
Derwing, T. M., Waugh, E., & Munro, M. J. (2021). Pragmatically speaking: Preparing adult ESL students for the workplace. Applied Pragmatics, 3(2), 107-135. https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.20001.der
Diao, W., & Chen, C. (2022). L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(4), 1293-1322. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0148
Down, M., Picknoll, D., Hoyne, G., Piggott, B., & Bulsara, C. (2024). When the real stuff happens: A qualitative descriptive study of the psychosocial outcomes of outdoor adventure education for adolescents. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-023-00151-3
Eragamreddy, N. (2023). A semantic study of pragmatic markers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 10(1), 54-65.
Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Exploring Pragmatics: Uncovering the layers of language and meaning. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(1), 1886-1895. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i3-50
Erman, B. (2001). Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on 'you know' in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(9), 1337-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00066-7
Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6(1), 167-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
Fuentes-Rodríguez, C., Placencia, M. E., & Palma-Fahey, M. (2016). Regional pragmatic variation in the use of the discourse marker pues in informal talk among university students in Quito (Ecuador), Santiago (Chile) and Seville (Spain). Journal of pragmatics, 97, 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.006
Furko, P. (2017). Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.54
Gillespie, A., Glăveanu, V., & de Saint Laurent, C. (2024). Pragmatism and methodology: Doing research that matters with mixed methods. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781009031066
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Han, D. (2011). Utterance production and interpretation: A discourse-pragmatic study on pragmatic markers in English public speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2776-2794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.008
Huang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Cognitive analysis of pragmatic functions of discourse markers in spoken English in the context of computational intelligence. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9883324
Husnaini, H. (2022). Development of Self Esteem-Oriented Micro Teaching Materials for IAIN Palopo English Education Students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 538-560.
Llopis Cardona, A., Hübscher, I., & Cabedo Nebot, A. (2024). A multimodal approach to Catalan pragmatic markers: An exploratory study. Languages, 9(4), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9040125
Matei, M. G. (2011). The influence of age and gender on the selection of discourse markers incasual conversations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology & Cultural Studies, 4(53), 213-220.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Nakijoba, S., & Kawalya, D. (2024). Outcomes of the contact between Luganda and English pragmatic markers. Journal of Humanities, 32(1), 7-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jh.v32i1.2
Sánchez-Hernández, A., Barón, J., & Llanes, À. (2024). The development of pragmatic markers in English as a second language: Do age and learning context matter? Languages, 9(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9040115
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thang, N. T. (2021) English-majored students’ attitudes towards pragmatic awareness. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(1), 120-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4662
Troshchenkova, E. V., & Blinova, O. V. (2020). Pragmatic markers in the aspect of communicative alignment. Development and Functioning of the Russian Language, 19(3), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.3.5
Volkova, L. (2017). Pragmatic markers in dialogical discourse. Lege Artis Language Yesterday,
Today, Tomorrow: The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), 379-427. https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0010
Zhan, F., Zhang, Y., & Long, H. (2021). Origin of modern Chinese pragmatic markers bushi:Negative copula or negative adjective? Lingua, 250, 102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102922
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 nagamuralieragamreddy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
