Factors Influencing EFL Student’s Boredom in Reading Academic Journal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i2.5934Abstract
Reading academic journals is an important part of academic life, especially for students. However, many students feel bored in reading academic journals, which can affect their academic performance. This study aims to find out the factors that influence students' boredom in reading academic journals, and to find out the strategies used by students in overcoming boredom in reading academic journals. The research method used a qualitative approach with a descriptive type. The participants in this study were four students majoring in English at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari. Data collection used interviews. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there are two factors that affect the boredom of students reading academic journals, namely internal factors and external factors, the first internal factor is 1) Lack of enthusiasm; 2) laziness; 3) motivation. The second factor, on the other hand, is external, and includes things 1) writing-related aspects, 2) vocabulary, 4) difficult-to-understand language, and 5) family. Students use various strategies to overcome boredom when reading academic journals, such as engaging in physical activities, clearing their minds, playing games, watching movies, finding a comfortable place to read, setting reading goals, reading simple texts, planning the right moment, listening to music.
References
Akmal S., Mulia, I, D. (2020). Investigating students’ interest on reading journal articles: Materials, reasons and strategies. Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Bashir, I. (2012). Impact of Reading on Students’ Academic Performance.
Campillo-Ferrer, J. M., Miralles-Martínez, P., & Sánchez-Ibáñez, R. (2020). Gamification In Higher Education: Impact On Student Motivation And The Acquisition Of Social And Civic Key Competencies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su12124822
Chengchen Li, & Ye Han. (2022). Learner-internal and learner-external factors for boredom amongst Chinese university EFL students. Journal of Education and Practice
Durbin, C. G. (2009). How to read a scientific research paper. Respiratory Care, 54(10), 1366–1371.
Green, T., & Gredler, M. (2002). The impact of home environment on student motivation and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 45-54.
Hallam, S., Price, J., & Katsarou, G. (2002)."The Effects of Background Music on Primary School Pupils' Task Performance." Educational Studies, 28(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690220124551
Husnaini, H. (2018). The Effectiveness Of Know Want-Learn (Kwl) Strategy In Teaching Reading Comprehension. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 6(2).
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
John G. Sharp, Brian Hemmings, Russell Kay & Jane C. Sharp (2017): Academic boredom and the perceived course experiences of final year Education Studies students at university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1386287
Kelly, M. (2010). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 317-332.
Keraf, G. (2001). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kruk, M. (2021). Investigating the experience of boredom during reading sessions in the foreign language classroom. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12339 Literacy.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Masruddin, Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024). Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412500.
Macklem, G. L. (2015). Boredom in the classroom: addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. Switzerland: Cham.Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13120-7
Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the Lecture Theatre: An Investigation into the Contributors, Moderators and Outcomes of Boredom amongst University Students.
Maulidar, V. (2018). An analysis of students’ interest in reading at UIN Ar-Raniry.
Mehta, R., Zhu, R. (Juliet), & Cheema, A. (2012)."Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition."Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784-799. https://doi.org/10.1086/665048
Milles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Moeleong, L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mora, F. (2011). Neuroeducation: A Science-based Approach to Teaching.
Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Daniels, L. (2010). What to do when feeling bored? Students’ strategies for coping with boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 626–638.
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020) Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners, System (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102259
Rown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). "Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning2.0."EDUCAUSEReview,43(1),16-32. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/1/minds-on-fire-open-education-the-long-tail-and-learning-20
Schiefele, U. (1999). "Interest and Learning From Text." Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
Schmidt, A., & Collette, F. (2017). "Factors Affecting Cognitive Performance in Daily Life: The Role of Circadian Rhythms." Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(7), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.62
Simanová, L., & Babiaková, S. (2022). The Socio-Cultural context of reading interest of younger learners. The New Educational Review, 70. 45-56. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.04
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor yang Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Smith, J. (2015). Family dynamics and academic stress: An exploration of the relationship between home life and student performance. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(3), 22-35.
Subramanyam, R. (2013). Why Students Should Read Scientific Papers.
Tarigan, H. G. (1994). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. S., Butler, S., White, M. J., & Lorch, R. F. (2001)."Assessment of Comprehension Abilities in Young Children." Reading and Writing, 14, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008101723516
Wardani, H, K., Syukriyah, F, M., & Hidayah, B. (2024). Identifying students' difficulties in reading comprehension tests. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 8(1), 15-30. https://ejournal-fkip.unisi.ac.id/index.php/eji
Zuriah, N. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan: Teori dan Aplikasi. Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul jannah, Citra Prasiska Puspita Tohamba, Syarif Amin, Yuliana Sain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)