EFL Students’ Perception on Technology: YouTube Application as Media in English Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i2.5938Abstract
In the current era, the challenges in the world of education are getting higher in meeting the needs of future generations in terms of learning, especially English, where English is used in technology languages such as YouTube, etc., is very large. This is due to the rapid development of technology. In the world of education, their life experiences are also very different, especially the experience in using technology for children who come from underprivileged families, which is certainly different from children from upper-middle families in this regard. The Internet itself opens up many possibilities for integrating technology in classroom learning. Youtube is one of the learning media that can be integrated in learning subjects that are considered difficult by students. The purpose of this research is to see to what extent Youtube can be used as a medium of learning in school subjects, especially English. The results of the study show that videos on Youtube can be used as a learning medium.
References
Abukhattala, I. (2016). The use of technology in language classrooms in Libya. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(4), 262-267.
Alavinia, P., & Qoitassi, K. (2013). On the viability of vocabulary learning enhancement through the implementation of MALL: The case of Iranian learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 412-426.
Al-Kathiri, F. (2015). Beyond the classroom walls: Edmodo in Saudi secondary school EFL instruction, attitudes, and challenges. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 189-204.
Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey. Language Teaching, 44(3), 328–353.
Alqahtani, M. & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 102-112.
American Psychological Association coalition for psychology in schools and education. (2015). Top 20 principles from psychology for PreK-12 teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/schools/cpse/top-twenty-principles.pdf. American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition (Page 206). American Psychological Association. Kindle Edition.
Azabdaftari, B., & Mozaheb, A. (2012). Comparing vocabulary learning of EFL learners by using two different strategies: Mobile learning vs flashcards. The EUROCALL Review, 20(2), 47-59.
Ahmed, Sabri Thabit Saleh. 2019. “Chat and Learn: Effectiveness of Using Whatsapp as a Pedagogical Tool to Enhance Efl Learners’ Reading and Writing Skills.” International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 8(2):61–68. doi: 10.18488/journal.23.2019.82.61.68.
Akbari, Zahra. 2015. “Current Challenges in Teaching/Learning English for EFL Learners: The Case of Junior High School and High School.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 199:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.524.
Ardiansyah, m Mohammad lutfi nugraha,Pasar Batu,Jakarta Timur. (2022) concept understanding. "analysis of the utilization of YouTube learning media; ' journal of the national seminar on research and technological innovation.
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The Effective Use of YouTube Videos for Teaching English Language in Classrooms as Supplementary Material at Taibah University in Alula. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research.
Baker,L.(2006). Meta cognition. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/ reference/ article/ metacognition/
Brandl, K. (2012). Effects of required and optional exchange tasks in online language learning environments. ReCALL. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000309
Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students' perceptions on the use of online learning platforms in efl classroom. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal (ELT-Tech Journal), 1(1), pp 22-30.
Creswell JW. (2013). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches by John W. Creswell (z-lib.org).pdf (p. 265).
Chinnery, G.M. (2006). Emerging technologies: going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
Casillano, N. F. B. (2019). Challenges of Implementing an E-Learning Platform in an Internet Struggling Province in the Philippines. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(10), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i10/137594
Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2017). Learning English using children's stories in mobile devices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 625-641.
Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.376
Dalimunte, Muhammad. 2015. “ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR THE FIRST YEAR.”
Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., & MacDougall, M. (1996). Students’ responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 719-752.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. Self- Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications.
Hadijah, S. (2016). Teaching by using video: Ways to make it more meaningful in EFL classrooms. Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching ISELT-4.
Husnaini, H. (2022). Development of Self Esteem-Oriented Micro Teaching Materials for IAIN Palopo English Education Students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 538-560.
Heriyanto, D. (2015). The effectiveness of using YouTube for vocabulary mastery. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 6(1).
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
Kelsen, B. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with college EFL students in Taiwan. Call-EJ Online.
Lexy. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000), hlm.138.
Mertler, C. A. & Charles, C. M. (2011). Introduction to educational research (7th ed.).
Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Masruddin, Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024). Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412500.
Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, (Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2002, Cet.XII), hlm. 203
Tristiana, N. E., & Rosyida, E. (2018). Students’ perception on the integrating of information and communication technology. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 11(1), pp 35-44.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 addinul kamil harahap, Farida Repeliwaty Kembaren
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)