Exploring The Adaptability of CEFR Descriptors in The Construction of EFL Reading Test Specifications in Indonesian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.6451Keywords:
CEFR descriptors, reading assessment, test specification, Indonesian EFL, syllabus analysis, language proficiency levelsAbstract
The implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) has become a global benchmark in language education, yet its contextual adaptability remains a critical issue, particularly in non-European settings such as Indonesia. This study investigates how CEFR descriptors can be systematically adapted to construct reading test specifications aligned with the learning objectives of EFL reading courses in an Indonesian university context. Focusing on the English Education Study Program at Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana, the researchers employed a qualitative descriptive approach through document analysis of three core reading course syllabi: Intensive Reading 1, Intensive Reading 2, and Extensive Reading. Instructional objectives from these syllabi were mapped against four CEFR reading descriptor scales to determine alignment with proficiency levels ranging from A2 to B2. The researchers then designed test specifications based on these alignments and validated them through expert judgment involving two language assessment specialists. A structured validation checklist was used to assess construct relevance, task appropriateness, text length, and micro-skill inclusion. The findings demonstrated a logical progression of reading proficiency across the courses and confirmed that CEFR descriptors can be meaningfully adapted to the Indonesian EFL context. While the study provides a foundational model for CEFR-aligned reading assessment, it acknowledges limitations related to scope, piloting, and generalizability. Future studies are recommended to conduct empirical trials and explore the integration of digital assessment tools. This research offers practical implications for EFL lecturers and curriculum developers seeking to improve language assessment practices in Indonesian higher education.
References
Akintunde, A. F. (2023). Purposeful Language Assessment: Selecting the Right Alternative Test. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 1(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2023.1(1).04
Al Lawati, Z. A. (2023). Investigating the characteristics of language test specifications and item writer guidelines, and their effect on item development: A mixed-method case study. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00233-5
Almalki, M., & Aljohani, A. (2022). Can There Be an Objective Language Tests? Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(05), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.125040
Arhin, A. K., Essuman, J., & Arhin, E. (2021). Analysis of Item Writing Flaws in a Communications Skills Test in a Ghanaian University. African Journal of Teacher Education, 10(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v10i2.6762
Bledsoe, J. (2021). Test specifications overview.
Davidson, F., & Lynch, B. K. (2002). Testcraft: A teacher’s guide to writing and using language test specifications. Yale University Press.
Europe, C. of. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion Volume. Council of Europe.
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. Routledge.
Fulcher, G., Panahi, A., & Mohebbi, H. (2022). Glenn Fulcher’s Thirty-Five Years of Contribution to Language Testing and Assessment: A Systematic Review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 29, 20–56. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.29.03
Gebril, A. (Ed.). (2021). Learning-Oriented Language Assessment: Putting Theory into Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014102
Gestanti, R., Mufanti, R., & Nimasari, E. (2019). Constructing Test Specification for Standardized Test of Academic English Proficiency (STAcEP). Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285347
Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2021). Using Full-information Item Analysis to Improve Item Quality. Educational Assessment, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1946390
Iskandar, I., Efendi, A. S., & Santosa, I. (2021). The Model of Listening CEFR-Based Test Specification for Higher Education. Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i2.5661
Li, J. (2019). An Evaluation of IELTS Speaking Test. OALib, 06(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105935
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Mao, A. (2022). Literature Review of Language Testing Theories and Approaches. OALib, 09(05), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108741
Noveanu, G. (2015). Assessment Specifications. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 84–85). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_22
Owen, N. (2018). Test Specifications. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0354
Sallehuddin Md Yusof. (2023). The Six Stages of Test Construction. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14509.26081/1
University of Barcelona, Figueras, N., Little, D., Trinity College Dublin, O’Sullivan, B., & British Council. (2022). Aligning Language Education with the CEFR: A Handbook. CEFR Journal - Research and Practice, 5, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTSIG.CEFR5-1
Usman, N., Hendrik, H., & Madehang, M. (2024). Difficulties in understanding the TOEFL reading test of english language education study program at university. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 755-773.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Festif Rudolf Hoinbala, Tiarma Marpaung

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)