Hunting for Improvement: A CIPP-Based Evaluation of the English Tourist Interaction Program at Vocational High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.6511Keywords:
CIPP Model Evaluation, English Program, EducationAbstract
Evaluation of the program is needed as study material for future decision-making. Thus, this research aims to evaluate the context, input, process, and product of the hunting tourist program implemented at SMK Berbudi Yogyakarta Class X with culinary, visual design, and beauty study programs. A qualitative research method was implemented in this research, using the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam. Observations, interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of documents, both written and in video form, are used as data in fulfilling the CIPP aspects. The research results found that the program context followed clear planning and was under the school's vision. Input evaluation has played a good role, although some aspects need improvement and correction. The evaluation process has been carried out with an initial agreement with good procedures, although there are still aspects that need to be considered, such as time management by participants. Additionally, the product evaluation results have achieved the goals and positive impacts that were set at the beginning. Furthermore, further research can deepen the data on the development of teaching modules for tourist hunting preparation.
References
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, A. (2008). Cepi Safrudin.(2008) Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoritisbagi Praktisi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Barnawi & Arifin, M. (2015). Teknik penulisan karya ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of Preschool Education Program According to CIPP Model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2).
Brown, J. D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. The Second Language Curriculum, 222–241.
Derisman, A., Ambiyar, A., & Wakhinuddin, W. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Honda Menggunakan Model CIPP pada Paket Keahlian Teknik Sepeda Motor di SMK Negeri 1 Lahat. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan: Research and Learning in Vocational Education, 1(3), 83–90.
Diharja, U., Machrawinayu, I., & Ritonga, M. G. A. (2023). Evaluasi Model CIPP dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran pada Program Kampung Cambridge Mutiara Cendekia. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(6), 3989–4002.
Ertürk, S. (2013). Eğitimde" program" geliştirme. Edge Akademi.
Faizin, I. (2021). Evaluasi Program Tahfidzul Qur’an Dengan Model CIPP. Al-Miskawaih: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 99–118.
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., Worthen, B. R., & Wingate, L. A. (2012). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Boston.
Hidayati, A. (2010). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Program Information Communication Technology (ICT) Menggunakan Model CIPP Pada Sekolah Menengah Di Kota Padang. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 76–80.
Indonesia, P. R. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Pemerintah Republik Indoensia.
Istiyani, N. M., & Utsman, U. (2020). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP Pada Pelatihan Menjahit Di LKP Kartika Bawen. Learning Community: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 3(2), 6– 13.
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.
Juri, A., Maksum, H., Purwanto, W., & Indrawan, E. (2021). Evaluasi program praktik kerja lapangan dengan metode CIPP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 5(3), 323–328.
Kavgaoglu, D., & Alci, B. (2016). Application of Context Input Process and Product Model in Curriculum Evaluation: Case Study of a Call Centre. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1659–1669.
Kobis, D. C. (2019). The Effectiveness of Tourist Hunting Project in Improving Students’ English Communication Skill. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 13(1), 65–80.
Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. (No Title). Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications. Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The role of triangulation in qualitative research: Converging perspectives. In Principles of Conducting Qualitative Research in Multicultural Settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global.
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (2014). M., & Saldana, J.(2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3.
Pratiwi, T., & Zulfitri, Z. (2024). The Effect of Using Storytelling Technique on Students’ Speaking Skill of II Class at SMPS Plus Kasih Ibu Patumbak. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(2), 1435–1448.
Ratnaya, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Dalem, A. A., & Atmaja, I. (2022). Cipp evaluation model for vocational education: a critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3).
Royse, D. D., Thyer, B. A., Padgett, D., & Logan, T. K. (2010). Program evaluation: An introduction.
Stratton, S. J. (2024). Purposeful sampling: advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 279–317). Springer.
Tsayang, G., Batane, T., & Majuta, A. (2020). The Impact of Interactive Smart Boards on Students’ Learning in Secondary Schools in Botswana: A Students’ Perspective. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 16(2), 22–39.
Turmuzi, M., Ratnaya, I. G., Al Idrus, S. W., Paraniti, A. A. I., & Nugraha, I. N. B. S. (2022). Literature review: evaluasi keterlaksanaan kurikulum 2013 menggunakan model evaluasi cipp (context, input, process, dan product). Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7220–7232.
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In Curriculum studies reader E2 (pp. 60–68). Routledge.
Williams, A., & Katz, L. (2001). The use of focus group methodology in education: Some theoretical and practical considerations, 5 (3). IEJLL: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning.
Wulaningrum, T., & Hadi, S. (2019). Soft skills profile of vocational school students in Yogyakarta City for entering the industrial world. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 9(3), 217– 228.
Wulantari, I. A. P. (2024). The students’ perception and challenges on the implementation of tourist hunting project (THP) for English speaking skills at SMAN 2 BANJAR. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Zainudin, M., Utami, A. D., Widyaningrum, R., & Amin, A. K. (2023). The Evaluation of Research-based Learning on ‘Moodle’Learning Management System Using CIPP Models. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 149–157.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aditya Sahrul Akbar, Dinar Martia Azizah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
