Rethinking Educational Practices: Handwriting and Its Role in Multisensory Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.6777Keywords:
cognitive strategy, handwriting, language learning, multisensory, online learningAbstract
Rapid development of digital technology has changed the educational practices, including the way students learn languages. This research aims to explore perceptions, experiences and challenges faced by the students in using handwriting as a part of multisensory learning strategy in online English class. This research employs convergent mix method whereas the data were gathered from 21 university students majoring in Information system through Likert scale questionnaire and open ended questions. The result of statistics and thematic analysis shows that most of respondents felt the cognitive benefits from handwriting, including improved memory, focus, grammar comprehension and learning engagement. Regression analysis showed that feeling comfort in handwriting has significant positive impact on memory ability; while challenges, including feeling tired and time required do not significantly reduce its cognitive benefits. This research supports multisensory learning theory (VAKT) and strengthen previous findings which showed that handwriting activates wider brain networks compared with typing. Last but not least, handwriting remains relevant in digital era and recommended to be integrated equally in online learning as a part of effective and holistic learning strategy.
References
Aragón-Mendizábal, E., Delgado-Casas, C., Navarro-Guzmán, J. I., Menacho-Jiménez, I., & Romero-Oliva, M. F. (2016). A comparative study of handwriting and computer typing in note-taking by university students. Comunicar, 24(48). https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-10
Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2010). Interrelationships among behavioral markers, genes, the brain, and treatment in dyslexia and dysgraphia. Future Neurology, 5(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.2217/fnl.10.22
Bani, M., & Masruddin, M. (2021). Development of an Android-based harmonic oscillation pocketbookfor senior high school students. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 93-103.
Desselle, S. P., & Shane, P. A. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note-taking in a professional doctorate course: Student performance, attitudes, and behaviors. INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, 9(3), 1.
Diaz, M., Mendoza-García, A., Ferrer, M. A., & Sabourin, R. (2025). A survey of handwriting synthesis from 2019 to 2024: A comprehensive review. Pattern Recognition, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111357
Ghisio, S., Alborno, P., Volta, E., Gori, M., & Volpe, G. (2017, November). A multimodal serious game to teach fractions in primary school. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multimodal Interaction for Education (pp. 67-70).
Guan, C. Q., Li, Y., Meng, W., & Morett, L. M. (2021). Curved vs. Straight-Line Handwriting Effects on Word Recognition in Typical and Dyslexic Readers Across Chinese and English. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745300
Harsismanto, J., Fredrika, L., Wati, N., Padila, Suryani, D., & Yandrizal. (2021). Effectiveness of playing origami intervention on improvement of fine motor development in preschool children. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 15(1), 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13565
Hildreth, G. (1963). Simplified handwriting for today. The Journal of Educational Research, 56(6), 330-333.
Husnaini, H. (2022). Development of Self-Esteem-Oriented Micro-Teaching Materials for IAIN Palopo English Education Students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 538-560.
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English: A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
Ihara, A. S., Nakajima, K., Kake, A., Ishimaru, K., Osugi, K., & Naruse, Y. (2021). Advantage of handwriting over typing on learning words: evidence from an N400 event-related potential index. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001
Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2023). HOW HANDWRITING SHAPES LITERACY ACQUISITION AND GENERAL COGNITION: Phenomena and Cognitive Mechanisms. In Routledge International Handbook of Visual-Motor Skills, Handwriting, and Spelling: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003284048-11
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., Gaetani, E., & Mazza, M. (2025). The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? Life, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030345
Mayer, C., Wallner, S., Budde-Spengler, N., Braunert, S., Arndt, P. A., & Kiefer, M. (2020). Literacy Training of kindergarten children with a pencil, keyboard, or tablet stylus: The influence of the writing tool on reading and writing performance at the letter and word level. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03054
Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2007). Handwriting: What do we know, and what do we need to know? Literacy, 41(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00453.x
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note-taking. Psychological Science, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Students in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Masruddin, Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024). Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412500.
Neumann, M. M., Hyde, M. B., Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., & Ford, R. M. (2012). Multisensory methods for early literacy learning. In Beyond the Lab: Applications of Cognitive Research in Memory and Learning.
Papadopoulos, I., Hall, A. H., Sekoulla, D., & Gao, Q. (2025). Examining Preschool Educators’ Beliefs About Authentic Early Writing Experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01870-6
Paraskevopoulos, E., Kuchenbuch, A., Herholz, S. C., & Pantev, C. (2012). Evidence for training-induced plasticity in multisensory brain structures: an MEG study. PLoS ONE, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036534
Raymundo, N. M., & Cermak, S. A. (2023). An Overview of Digital Applications for Teaching Handwriting. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2023.2283698
Rønningsbakk, L. (2022). How Does the Shift from Handwriting to Digital Writing Technologies Impact Writing for Learning in School? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 231–240). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_26
Seyll, L., & Content, A. (2022). Letter-Like Shape Recognition in Preschool Children: Does Graphomotor Knowledge Contribute? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726454
Shenoy, P., & Kumar, T. (2024). A Human-Centered Tactile Perception Device for Enhanced Learning. Procedia CIRP, 128, 43-48.
Shibata, H., & Omura, K. (2018). Reconsideration of the effects of handwriting: Comparing cognitive load of handwriting and typing. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, 6(4), 255-261.
Subarkah, M. Z., Sulandari, W., & Respatiwulan, R. (2024). Implementation of transfer learning in convolutional neural network architecture for Android-based handwriting quality detection. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3095(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204724
Sut, A. L. S., Wah, L. L., Min, L. H., & Chen, O. S. (2022). Revisiting Handwriting Fundamentals Through an Interdisciplinary Framework. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 29(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.1.3
Tucha, O., Tucha, L., & Lange, K. W. (2008). Graphonomics, automaticity, and handwriting assessment. In Literacy (Vol. 42, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00494.x
Wallace, R. R., & Schomer, J. H. (1994). Simplifying handwriting instruction for the 21st century. Education, 114(3), 413-418.
Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2021). The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychological Science, 32(7), 1086-1103.
Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., Tømte, C., & Løver, N. (2016b). The effect of pen and paper or tablet computer on early writing—a pilot study. Computers & Education, 98, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Rejeki, Angela Bayu Pertama Sari, Dwi Iswahyuni, Devita Widyaningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
