The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Writing a Thesis by EFL Postgraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7307Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), EFL Postgraduate Students, Thesis Writing.Abstract
This research explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in thesis writing by four postgraduate students who are English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners at an Indonesian university. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected over a two-month period through open-ended questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and documentation analysis. The findings reveal that students utilized various AI tools such as Grammarly, QuillBot, ChatGPT, Claude, Meta AI, and Perplexity, across different stages of their writing process, including brainstorming, paraphrasing, grammar correction, structural organization, and language refinement. Before adopting AI, participants encountered challenges in idea development, coherence, and linguistic accuracy. Following the integration of AI tools, they reported improvements in clarity, organization, and writing confidence. Most students expressed a strong willingness to continue using AI due to its perceived benefits in enhancing efficiency, precision, and learning outcomes. While limited to one university context in Indonesia, this study provides insights into the positive role of AI integration in supporting academic writing development among EFL postgraduate students.
References
Adams, D., & Chuah, K.-M. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based tools in research writing: Current trends and future potentials. In P. Churi, S. Joshi, M. Elhoseny, & A. Omrane (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Practical Approach (pp. 169–184). CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184157-9
Alhusban, A. M. (2016). The impact of modern technological tools on students writing skills in English as a second language. US-China Education Review A, 6(7), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2016.07.006.
Aljafen, B. S. (2018). Traditional Vs . Wiki: Saudi students’ performance in and perceptions of collaborative writing in a Wiki [University of Tennessee]. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4882/
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Apriani, E., Daulay, S. H., Aprilia, F., Marzuki, A. G., Warsah, I., & Supardan, D. (2025). A Mixed-Method Study on the Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Students’ Perceived Experiences. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1 (41)), 26-45.
Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-Assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI Age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 00(0), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT — A case study. Cogent Education, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210461
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Daulay, S. H. (2024). Analyzing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT to Improve Student Writing Proficiency in Recount Texts. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(2), 1780-1787.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13(February), 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Elnadeef, F. (2023). Digital natives: How technology affects student learning in the digital age. International Journal of Technology in Education, 18(3), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijte.2023.01803
Faisal, F., & Carabella, P. A. (2023). Utilizing Grammarly in an academic writing process : Higher-education students’ perceived views. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. Journal of English Language, 12(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
Gayed, A., Khattab, A. M., & Kamal, A. (2022). The role of technology in enhancing EFL students’ writing skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 67(1), 45–53.
Ghahri, F., Hashamdar, M., & Mohamadi, Z. (2015). Technology: A better teacher in writing skill. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(7), 1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0507.24
Hajimaghsoodi, A., & Maftoon, P. (2020). The impact of technology on the academic writing of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1).
Huang, L., & Chou, Y. (2023). The role of AI in academic writing: Perspectives from EFL students. TESOL Quarterly. (Ahead of print—volume and page pending)
Hutauruk, D. R., & Daulay, S. H. (2024, June). Teachers’ Perception of Generative AI Tools for English Language Instruction. In Conference on English Language Teaching (pp. 69-78).
Jia, F., Sun, D., Ma, Q., & Looi, C. K. (2022). Developing an AI-based learning system for L2 learners’ authentic and ubiquitous learning in English language. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315527
Khabib, S. (2022). Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249
Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of QuillBot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
Lee, S. M. (2019). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186
Lestari, D. (2020). Challenges in academic writing among Indonesian EFL students. Journal of EFL Teaching, 18(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1234/jeflt.2020.01802
Lin, X., & Morrison, G. (2021). The challenges of thesis writing in graduate education. Journal of Higher Education Research, 25(3), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1234/jher.2021.02503
Lu, X. (2019). An empirical study on the artificial intelligence writing evaluation system in China CET. Big Data, 7(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2018.0151
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Nurmayanti, N., & Suryadi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of using QuillBot in improving writing for students of English education study program. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392
Rahman, M. M., Alharbi, F. M., & Khan, A. (2022). AI in education: Current trends and future implications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. (Volume and page pending)
Ribeiro, J. (2021). A.I. in 2020: A year writing about artificial intelligence. Independently Published.
Samosir, S. A., & Daulay, S. H. (2023, July). EFL students’ perception of the use “Grammarly application” as Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE). In Conference on English Language Teaching (pp. 928-940).
Syahril, I. (2022, March). G20 bahas teknologi digital dalam pendidikan sebagai isu prioritas. Ministry of Education and Culture. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2022/03/g20-bahas-teknologi-digitaldalam-pendidikan-sebagai-isu-prioritas
Tsai, S. C. (2020). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799412
Yousofi, R. (2022). Grammarly deployment (in)efficacy within EFL academic writing classrooms: An attitudinal report from Afghanistan. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2142446
Zhao, Y., et al. (2021). EFL students’ attitudes toward AI-supported writing tools. English Language Teaching.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asmawati, Utami Dewi, Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
