Exploring the Effects of Teacher’s Nonverbal Communication on EFL Students' Academic Motivation

Authors

  • Mutia Asisyifa English Language Education, Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Maemuna Muhayyang English Language Education, Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nur Aeni English Language Education, Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7428

Keywords:

Teachers’ communication, verbal communication, nonverbal communication, academic motivation, EFL learning

Abstract

Teacher’s nonverbal communication significantly effects students’ learning experiences, particularly in EFL Islamic classroom context where language and motivation are closely linked. This study examined the effects of teachers’ nonverbal communication on students’ academic motivation using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 60 students through questionnaires measuring seven aspects of nonverbal communication namely proxemics, haptics, kinesics, chronemics, oculesics, physical environment, and paralanguage and three aspects of motivation that is, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and interviews with ten selected students. Findings revealed that kinesics and proxemics received the highest ratings, indicating active use of gestures and classroom movement to engage students. Haptics and paralanguage scored lowest, suggesting limited use due to cultural norms. Correlation and regression analyses indicated a strong positive relationship between teachers’ nonverbal communication and student motivation. Observations confirmed that smiling, nodding, using hand gestures, and approaching students created a positive and low-anxiety learning atmosphere. Interviews supported these results, with students expressing greater confidence, comfort, and willingness to participate when teachers-maintained eye contact, used expressive gestures, and adjusted their proximity. This study highlights the importance of nonverbal behaviors in fostering a motivating EFL learning environment. Teachers’ awareness and intentional use of such cues can strengthen engagement and emotional connection, even in culturally specific settings.

References

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Brown, H. Douglas, and Heekyeong Lee. 2015. Teaching Principles. P. Ed Australia.

Bruner, Jerome S. 1957. “On Perceptual Readiness.” Psychological Review 64(2):123.

Burgoon, Judee K., Valerie Manusov, and Laura K. Guerrero. 2021. Nonverbal Communication. Routledge.

Chastain, Kenneth. 1976. “Developing Second-Language Skills: Theory and Practice.” (No Title).

Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2000. “How Teacher Education Matters.” Journal of Teacher Education 51(3):166–73.

DeVito, Maria. 2016. “Factors Influencing Student Engagement.”

Grigore, Elena Corina, Andre Pereira, Ian Zhou, David Wang, and Brian Scassellati. 2016. “Talk to Me: Verbal Communication Improves Perceptions of Friendship and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction.” Pp. 51–63 in Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 20–23, 2016, Proceedings 16. Springer.

Hall, Edward T. 1973. The Silent Language. Anchor.

Joseph A. DeVito. 2016. Human Communication The Basic Course Fourteenth Edition.

Knapp, M., and J. Hall. 2010. “Non-Verbal Communication in Human Interaction.”

Mehrabian, Albert. 1971. “Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes.” Wadsworth 196.

Pianta, Robert C., Bridget K. Hamre, and Joseph P. Allen. 2012. “Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions.” Pp. 365–86 in Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.

Reeve, Johnmarshall, and Hyungshim Jang. 2006. “What Teachers Say and Do to Support Students’ Autonomy during a Learning Activity.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98(1):209.

Richmond, Virginia P., and James C. McCroskey. 2000. “The Impact of Supervisor and Subordinate Immediacy on Relational and Organizational Outcomes.” Communications Monographs 67(1):85–95.

Rocci, Andrea, and Louis de Saussure. 2016. Verbal Communication. Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L.Deci. 2019. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 66(6):747–54. doi: 10.1037/cou0000340.

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Vol. 86. Harvard university press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-14

Citation Check