Unveiling Indonesian EFL Textbooks Content: Lexical Density and Readability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7487Keywords:
Indonesian EFL, Lexical Density, Readability, SFL, TextbooksAbstract
The complexity of reading text can be determined by lexical density and readability levels. The purposes of the research are to find the lexical density and readable level of reading text in local textbooks of Indonesian EFL. This research took a descriptive qualitative approach; the document of this study was fourteen reading text selected from each chapter from Modul Belajar Praktis Bahasa Inggris. The researcher grounded on Ure’s (1971) for lexical density and Flesch’s (1994) for determine readability level. After analyzing the data, the result show that all lexical density of the reading texts was high and the readability score ranging from 43.46 to 80.36. Based on Flesch’s (1994) from the fourteen reading texts from this textbook was classified into 5 level: easy for two texts, fairly easy for five texts, standard for two texts, fairly difficult for three and difficult for three.
References
Arikutno, S. (2006). Prosedur penilaian suatu pendekatan praktek. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education eight edition. United State: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bahrudin, D. V. Y. (2016). The effect of textbook readability on students’ reading comprehension. Jurnal Pemikiran Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Sains, 4(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.31102/wacanadidaktika.4.1.42-54
Halliday, M. (1985). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.
Madjdi, A. H., & Rokhayani, A. (2018). Does the writer of English textbook integrate norms in reading passage he/she wrote. PROMINENT Journal, 1(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v1i1.2503
Miskiyah, N., & Amalia, T. Z. (2022). Analyzing lexical density and readability of reading texts in English textbook “stop bullying now” by Mahrukh Bashir. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v5i1.12199
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Nurcahyo, A. D., Rusiana, Mutohhar, & Nuraeningsih. (2024). Teachers’ efforts for students’ literacy development through extensive reading. Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (TEYLIN), 5, 260–263.
Nurhidayah, S., Faridi, A., & Shakiyya, Z. (2023). Evaluating the appropriateness of English textbook used for teaching English for specific purposes. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
Putri, A. S., Anshary, E. P., Sinar, T. S., & Maharani, P. (2024). Analyzing lexical density and readability in IELTS band 4 students’ writing test. International Journal Linguistics of Sumatra and Malay, 2(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v2i2.17886
Rizkiani, D., Mahdi, S., & Sujatna, E. T. S. (2022). Lexical density and readability of the facil’s ‘advanced learning textbook’ for Indonesian high school students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1157
Sudrajat, M. W., & Wachidah, S. (2022). The lexical density and experiential structure of nominal groups of the discussion section of skripsis and research articles. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 3(2).
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical Density and Register Differentiation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 96–104.
Wekes, P., Rombepajung, P., & Kumayas, T. (2022). An analysis on readability level of English reading texts in the English textbook entitled Bahasa Inggris unruk siswa SMA-MA/SMK-MAK kelas XI by Otong Setiawan DJ. and Supeni. Journal of Teaching English Linguistics, and Literature, 1(1), 1–22.
Yulianto. (2019). An analysis on readability level of english reading texts for eighth grade students. Journal of English For Academic.
Zeeland, H. van, & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension: The Same or Different from Reading Comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(479), 457.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alifia Berlianti, Slamet Utomo, Atik Rokhayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
