Investigating Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT's Role in Supporting Writing Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7886Keywords:
ChatGPT, Students’ perception, Writing skillsAbstract
This study investigated second-semester students of the English Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi perception of the role of ChatGPT in improving their English writing skills. A descriptive qualitative design was employed, with data collected over 2 days in July 2025 through semi-structured interviews. From a preliminary survey of 25 students, 8 were selected based on their active use of ChatGPT on smartphones for writing activities. Data were analysed using a phenomenological approach to capture students lived experiences and perceptions. The findings revealed that students generally held positive views of ChatGPT, particularly in generating ideas, enriching vocabulary, improving grammar awareness, constructing sentences, and building confidence. ChatGPT was also valued for its accessibility and efficiency, often functioning as a virtual tutor that fostered self-directed learning boosted writing confidence. Despite these advantages, several challenges were identified, such as overreliance on the application, restricted access to premium features, and minor inconsistencies in generated outputs. The study concludes that ChatGPT offers meaningful support for developing writing competence among EFL learners, provided that its use is guided critically and integrated with traditional pedagogical strategies to maintain learners’ creativity, accuracy, and analytical reasoning.
References
Artiana, N., & Fakhrurriana, R. (2024). EFL undergraduate students’perspective on using AI-based ChatGPT in academic writing. Language and Education Journal,9(1), 1–11.Asiah, N., Ardian, E., & Amri, S. (2020). A STUDY ON THE STUDENTS’ FACTOR DIFFICULTY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT VIII GRADE OF MTs SABILAL MUHTADIN TEMBILAHAN. J-Shelves of Indragiri (Jsi), 1(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.32520/jsi.v1i2.1057
Collins, S. P., Storrow, A., Liu, D., Jenkins, C. A., Miller, K. F., Kampe, C., & Butler, J. (2021). No Title 済無No Title No Title No Title.
DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Englander, M., & Morley, J. (2023). Phenomenological psychology and qualitative research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09781-8
Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking Is for Doing: Portraits of Social Cognition From Daguerreotype to Laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.877
Fitria, T. N. (2018). Error Analysis Found in Students’ Writing Composition of Simple Future Tense. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v1i3.5028
Garcia, A. R., Filipe, S. B., Fernandes, C., Estevão, C., & Ramos, G. (2013). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title.
Hasanah, U., & Nurcholis, I. A. (2024). English Education Students’ Perception of the Use of ChatGPT in Writing Articles. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 1(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v1i2.298
Hewitt, O., Gurney-Smith, B., & Golding, K. (2018). A qualitative exploration of the experiences of adoptive parents attending ‘Nurturing Attachments’, a dyadic developmental psychotherapy informed group. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104517753511
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Maharani, M. M. (2018). Graphic Organizers to Improve Students’ Writing on Recount Paragraphs. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.942
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(August), 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Mammadova, T. (2019). Teaching grammar to a grammar-free generation. 116.
Nur Fitria, T. (2020). Spelling Error Analysis in Students’ Writing English Composition. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i2.988
Nurul Khofifah Lubis, Azhar, F., & Daud, A. (2025). Students ’ Perception Towards ChatGPT for Academic Writing at English Study Program FKIP. 4778. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.5887
Rief, W., & Joormann, J. (2019). Revisiting the cognitive model of depression: The role of expectations. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i1.32605
Rivera, G. N., Christy, A. G., Kim, J., Vess, M., Hicks, J. A., & Schlegel, R. J. (2019). Understanding the Relationship Between Perceived Authenticity and Well-Being. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000161
Villar Faller, J. M. (2018). Grammarly Investigation into EFL Writing Issues Involving Omani Learners. International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 5(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v5n3p16
Yu, N., Zhang, J., Mitra, S., Smith, R., & Rich, A. (2025). Capabilities with Classical Educational Theories.
Zhang, K. (2025). Enhancing Critical Writing Through AI Feedback: A Randomized Control Study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050600
Zhao, X., Hu, J., & Cox, A. (2024). Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Student Academic Writing in Higher Education: The Use of Wordtune by Chinese international students. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1, 2726–2735. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2024.329
Zhao, X., Sbaffi, L., & Cox, A. (2025). The Digitisation of Writing in Higher Education: Exploring the Use of Wordtune as an AI Writing Assistant. In Electronics (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14061194
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mardiansyah, Rulik Setiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
