The Effect of Using Bigbox Application on Reading Comprehension of 5th Grade Elementary School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7954Keywords:
Bigbox application, digital learning, elementary education, reading comprehension,Abstract
Reading comprehension is a crucial skill for elementary school students, yet many still face challenges due to limited vocabulary, low engagement, and the limitations of traditional teaching methods. With the advancement of digital technology, applications such as BigBox have been developed to provide interactive storybooks, vocabulary activities, and gamified exercises that foster student motivation and comprehension. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the BigBox application in improving the reading comprehension of 5th-grade elementary school students based on students’ perspectives. A qualitative case study design was employed, involving classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and student journals. The data was analyzed by thematic analysis. The findings indicate that BigBox supports students’ comprehension by enhancing engagement, motivation, and active participation compared to conventional reading practices. The interactive features of the application, including digital books, vocabulary exercises, and reading comprehension quizzes, played a crucial role in engaging students and improving their understanding of texts. The study highlights the potential of integrating digital applications like BigBox into elementary reading programs as a transformative approach to strengthening literacy development.
References
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and engagement in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 409–429.
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Integrating technology into the curriculum and its impact on student achievement. International Journal of Education, 8(1), 1–15.
Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99–109). Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. National Institute of Education.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bishop, M. J., Amankwatia, T. B., & Cates, W. M. (2008). Sound’s use in instructional software to enhance learning: A theory-to-practice content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9063-3
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-0089068-5
Bowman, R. F. (1982). A “Pac-Man” theory of motivation: Tactical implications for classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 22(9), 14–17.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Chen, C. M., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). Learning in a u-learning environment: Learners’ attitudes, motivation, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021
Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 258–276.
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79– 122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
Dalton, B., & Proctor, C. P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. In J. Coiro et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 297–324). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(9), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Doolittle, P. E., & Camp, W. G. (1999). Constructivism: The career and technical education perspective. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 16(1), 23–46.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Fadel, C., & Lemke, C. (2008). Multimodal learning through media: What the research says. Cisco Systems.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
Gee, E. R. (2013). Digital media and learning: A prospective look at the next generation of research. MIT Press.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2012). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167190
Gülbahar, Y. (2021). Integrating technology in education: Issues, theories, and practices. Routledge.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kucirkova, N., & Falloon, G. (2017). Apps, technology and younger learners: International evidence for teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 391–393.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizki putri jasmine Siahaan, Deasy Yunita Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
