Digital Brainstorming with Mentimeter: Enlightening Students’ Paragraph Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7994Keywords:
Brainstorming, Digital Device, Mentimeter, Opinion ParagraphAbstract
Mentimeter is a digital brainstorming device to enlarge students’ skill in writing opinion paragraph. This research aims to explore the implementation of this device in students’ brainstorming sessions particularly in creating and establishing ideas through pre-writing stage. Therefore, this research also portrays the students’ engagement improvement that caused on their clarity and structure of the writing. Devoting a qualitative research design, data were gathered across observation and documentation from third-semester students of the English Education study program at Uin Raden Intan Lampung. The results expose that Mentimeter meaningfully improved students’ motivation and engagement during brainstorming sessions. Its collaborative and visual features stimulated students to promote ideas more easily and comprehensiveness, which in turn helped them form more focused and comprehensible paragraphs. Students’ writings established clearer topic sentences, well-developed supporting sentences, and enhanced logical flow, signifying that Mentimeter effectively helped idea generation and organization. Although the results are inspiring, the research declares its restrictions in terms of the opportunity of the classroom and its main focus on organization and content, which delays grammar, vocabulary, and stylistic less examined. In brief, the researcher concludes that incorporating digitals device such as Mentimeter in writing classes may efficiently promote students in incapacitating barriers in the pre-writing phase and recommend further research to expand its long-term impact and implementation among different writing genres.
References
Aleman-Saravia, A. C., & Deroncele-Acosta, A. (2021). Technology, Pedagogy and Content (TPACK framework): Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings - 2021 16th Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies, LACLO 2021, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO54177.2021.00069
Balida, D. A. R., & Alhabsi, S. S. (2024). An In-depth Inquiry into the Complexities of Composition Writing Among Higher Education Students in Oman. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V14N3P326
Bartram, J. (2025). Writing academically: Paragraph structure. https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/writing/paras
Bisriyah, M. (2022). EFL University Students’ Difficulties in the Essay Writing Process. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30998/SCOPE.V7I1.13793
Budiana, C. I. (2023). Brainstorming and Mind-mapping: Crucial Basic Skills Duet in Building Critical Thinking for Academic Composition. Kata, 25(00), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.9744/KATA.25.00.38-41
Bani, M., & Masruddin, M. (2021). Development of Android-based harmonic oscillation pocket book for senior high school students. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 93-103.
Chotimah, I. C., & Cahyani, D. A. (2022). The effect of Mentimeter on students’ Writing achievement in online learning. EnJourMe, 7(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.26905/ENJOURME.V7I1.7900
Chotimah, I. C., & Cahyani, D. A. (2023). Students’ perceptions on the use of Mentimeter media in learning to write Descriptive Text. EnJourMe, 8(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.26905/ENJOURME.V8I1.10646
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022a). How to do qualitative research? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022b). How to do qualitative research? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Furwana, D., Muin, F. R., Zainuddin, A. A., & Mulyani, A. G. (2024). Unlocking the Potential: Exploring the Impact of Online Assessment in English Language Teaching. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 653-662.
Herrera-Pavo, M. Á. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LCSI.2020.100437
Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2020). The Transformation of the Innovation Process: How Digital Tools are Changing Work, Collaboration, and Organizations in New Product Development*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/JPIM.12547
Mohin, M., Kunzwa, L., & Patel, S. (2022). Using mentimeter to enhance learning and teaching in a large class. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, Vol 9, Page 48 - 57, 2022, 9(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.22.005
Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.210
Park, E. (2019). EFL Learners’ Writing Apprehension Change by Process Writing Approach. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2019.35.4.71
Rehema, N. (2024). The Effectiveness of Brainstorming in Developing Students’ Creative and Critical Thinking. A Case of Kakungulu Memorial School Kibuli in Makindye Division Kampala District. IAA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 10(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.59298/IAAJSS/2024/101.34.41000
Rohim, A. (2018). ANANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S PARAGRAPH WRITING.
Subach, T. (2024). The main aspects of the digital development of society. Theoretical Economics, 0(4), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2024-4-24-35
Tomczak, B. (2022). Why Mastering Strong Paragraph Writing Is Crucial For Essay Writing - Excelsior Classes. Excelsior Classes. https://excelsiorclasses.com/why-mastering-strong-paragraph-writing-is-crucial-for-essay-writing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Wong, P. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). Enhancing Writing Vocabulary Using Mentimeter. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.19.3.7
Wu Suen, L. J., Huang, H. M., & Lee, H. H. (2014). [A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling]. Hu Li Za Zhi The Journal of Nursing, 61(3), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Puspita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
