The Autonomous Learning in Supporting Communication On Board in 5.0 Era (A Study Case of Young Cadets’ ELL at PIP Makassar)

Authors

  • Novianty Palayukan Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sunarlia Limbong Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar, Indonesia
  • Edi Wahyono Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia
  • Nurul Hatifah Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8210

Keywords:

autonomous learning, communication on board, Maritime English, society 5.0, tablet-asisted learning

Abstract

This study investigates the role of tablet-assisted autonomous learning in improving Maritime English proficiency for on-board communication among young cadets at PIP Makassar in the 5.0 Era. It aims to measure young cadets’ levels of autonomous learning, identify barriers, and explore applied strategies. A mixed-method design was employed, combining quantitative data from 141 young cadets collected using the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (Fisher & King, 2010) with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that 98 (69.5%) of young cadets demonstrated a high level of autonomy and 43 (30.5%) a moderate level, with desire for learning emerging as the strongest factor, followed by self-control and self-management. Major barriers included limited tablet specifications, unstable campus Wi-Fi, and heavy academic schedules. Nevertheless, young cadets employed strategies such as reading e-books, listening to English songs, and reviewing materials during optimal times. These strategies primarily supported receptive skills (reading and listening), consistent with Krashen’s Input Hypothesis. The findings contribute to maritime education literature by highlighting that while technology promotes learner autonomy, its effectiveness depends on institutional support through device enhancement, reliable internet access, and flexible study arrangements.

References

Fajrah, N. Y. (2023). An analysis of self-directed learning of the English major students and the non-English major students of IAIN Parepare in learning English (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Parepare).

Fikroni, M. R. (2020). Teaching English as a foreign language. Jember: IAIN Jember.

Fisher, M. J., & King, J. (2010). The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47–50.

Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Gibbons, M. (2012). The self-directed learning handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

International Maritime Organization. (2000). Standard marine communication phrases (SMCP). London: IMO.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (Language Teaching Methodology Series). Oxford: Pergamon.

Mentz, E. (2017). Self-directed learning research. Cape Town: AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2017.sdle01

Rohmiyati, Y. (2024). English learning strategy in 5.0 era. Yogyakarta: YPAD Penerbit.

Si, K., & Zhang, D. (2023). Exploring the role of TESOL in enhancing education for marine engineering undergraduate students: A literature review. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(2), 55–63.

Supe, A., Dandekar, S., Rege, N., & Mahdi, F. (2024). Self-directed learning. In Global medical education in normal and challenging times (pp. 69–80). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31986-0_7

Wang, X. (2021). Retraction note: Research on tool change time and the dynamic reliability of the machining process based on sensitivity analysis (The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 89(5–8), 1535–1544, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9177-0). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 115(9), 3363–3363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07435-2

Downloads

Published

2025-11-02

Citation Check