Discourse Function in Wordwall: An Analysis of Instructions and feedback in English Learning Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8555Keywords:
Discourse Function, Wordwall, Systemic Functional Linguistics, And Digital Learning.Abstract
This study examines the discourse functions of instructional language and feedback in a Wordwall-based English language learning exercise. Using qualitative discourse analysis techniques based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Sinclair and Coulthard's classroom discourse model, this research analyzed six publicly worwall activities intended for elementary students. The study identified six primary discourse functions: directive, procedural, evaluative, motivational, corrective, and informative. Directive and procedural functions dominated the instructional phase, providing clarity and task organization, while evaluative and motivational functions defined the feedback phase, providing reinforcement and emotional support. Informational feedback occurred less frequently, suggesting that automatic responses had limited linguistic scaffolding. Overall, Wordwall is not only a gamified learning tool, but also as a structured discourse environment that influences learner engagement, participation, meaning making. These observations provide practical implication for educators, especially in the selection, modification and supplementation of wordwall activities to optimize instructional clarity, improve feedback clarity and promote reflective and language centered learning.
References
Alfares, N. S. (2025). Investigating the efficacy of Wordwall platform in enhancing vocabulary learning in Saudi EFL classrooms. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.345672
Ding, Y., & Zhu, J. (2025). Mobile based peer feedback in EFL speaking: Learners’ motivation, behavioral engagement in feedback provision, and achievement. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9
Fan, N., & Ma, Y. (2022). The effects of automated writing evaluation feedback on English writing quality: A systematic review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 28, 53–73. (PDF: ERIC)
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2023). Exploring EFL learners’ affective engagement and writing performance: The mediating role of feedback perceptions. Assessing Writing, 58, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100770
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2022). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.
Husnaini, H. (2022). Development of Self Esteem-Oriented Micro Teaching Materials for IAIN Palopo English Education Students. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 538-560.
Kahar, N. H., & Baa, S. (2024). Using Wordwall medium to improve students’ junior secondary school vocabulary mastery. Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (INACELT), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.240212.109
Kao, C.-W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024). Timed second language writing performance: Effects of perceived teacher vs perceived automated feedback. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03522-3
Lee, I. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and the problem of ineffective written feedback in language education. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231150144
Lin, T.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2024). Artificial intelligence–supported feedback and learner engagement in digital English learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13501
Lu, L. (2023). Evaluative and feedback mechanisms in writing for ESL learners. Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life. https://www.clausiuspress.com/article/9705.html
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022). Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080
Masruddin, Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024). Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412500.
Pangestu, R. F., & Surjono, H. D. (2023). Design Principles of Learning Messages in E-Learning. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v6i1.52228
Purnamasari, D., & Purwandari, R. D. (2025). The role of Wordwall in improving interactive learning quality: A systematic literature review. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 1–10. https://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/article/view/1535
Rahimi, M., & Shute, V. J. (2023). Review of feedback in digital learning environments: Trends, challenges, and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 107607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107607
Rahman, M. A., & Arifin, S. (2024). Investigating the clarity of teacher instruction and its impact on student engagement in EFL classrooms. Asian EFL Journal, 26(2), 110–129.
Rasyid, M., & Rahman, A. (2024). Gamification and digital scaffolding in EFL learning: Enhancing engagement through adaptive technology. Asian EFL Journal, 26(3), 142–159.
Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Review of computer-based assessment and feedback: The next generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106944
Sun, T., & Zhang, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language education: Enhancing feedback and instruction in EFL classrooms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100108
Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2022). The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 909802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909802
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ulfa Rayhani Nst, Nida Husna, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
