Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs and Their Practice Towards CLT In EFL Classroom

Authors

  • Nadaa Putri Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta , Indonesia
  • Salsabila Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta , Indonesia
  • Meszalunna Zafira Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta , Indonesia
  • Atik Yuliyani Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta , Indonesia
  • Haryanti Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.8867

Keywords:

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); EFL Classroom; Teacher beliefs; Teaching practices.

Abstract

Research in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) has consistently shown that teachers’ classroom practices are influenced by their pedagogical beliefs, although alignment between beliefs and practices is not always evident. This study explores junior high school teachers’ beliefs about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and examines the extent to which these beliefs are reflected in their classroom practices. Using a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. The findings reveal a clear misalignment between teachers’ stated support for CLT principles, such as student-centered learning, and their actual classroom practices, which remain largely teacher-centered with frequent use of the mother tongue. This gap is primarily attributed to students’ low English proficiency, low motivation, and limited technological resources. These constraints compel teachers to adapt their practices in ways that contradict their beliefs. The study highlights that mismatches between CLT beliefs and practices stem more from contextual limitations than from a lack of conceptual understanding. Practically, the findings suggest the need for context-sensitive CLT implementation, targeted professional development, and institutional support to help teachers enact communicative approaches more effectively in constrained EFL settings.

References

Aksoy, K. (2015). What you Think is not what you do in the classroom: Investigating Teacher’s Beliefs for Classroom Management in an EFL Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.597

Armnazi, M., & Alakrash, H. (2021). Factors Affecting the Application of Communicative Language Teaching CLT in Syrian Schools. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v2i1.143

Audil, A. F., & Mustafa, H. R. (2024). From Theory to Classroom: Examining Communicative Language Teaching Practices in Iraq. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23809

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Chang, A. N., & Suparmi, S. (2020). The Implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Factors Hindering Teachers from Implementing it in High School. Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 13(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.31332/atdbwv13i1.1598

Diouani, A.-E. (2020). Communicative Language Teaching in the Moroccan Classroom: Perception, Practices, and Difficulties. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5251

Garcia-Ponce, E. E., & Tagg, C. (2020). Role of EFL teachers’ beliefs in speaking practice: The case of a Mexican university. System, 95, 102376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102376

Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Ismayanti, D., & Syam, A. T. (2022). The Community Manipulation through Big Brother’ s Tyranny in George Orwell’ s Nineteen Eighty-Four. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 1556â-1569.

Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.187

Lazdina, S., & Daga-Krumina, E. (2023). Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: Why is It Still a Challenge? To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator, 272–291. https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.17

Lőrincz, M. (2023). EFL Student Teachers’ Beliefs about Language Teaching Approaches and Instructional Practices. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 20(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.56040/mlrc2024

Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.

Mahmoud Fallatah, R. (2021). A Sociomaterial Perspective of the Challenges of Implementing the Communicative Approach in Saudi State Schools. Arab World English Journal, 12(4), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no4.20

Nurman, N. H., Mahmud, M., & Salija, K. (2024). Analisis Keyakinan dan Praktik Guru dalam Mengajar Bahasa Inggris Menggunakan Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (An Analysis on Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices In Teaching English Using Communicative Language Teaching). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Nyamayedenga, M. S., & de Jager, L. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about the implementation of communicative language teaching at primary school level in Zimbabwe. Per Linguam, 36(0). https://doi.org/10.5785/36-1-888

Pusparini, R., Widiati, U., & Susanti, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about English Language Teaching and Learning in EFL classroom: A review of literature. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1212

Qasemi, A. S., & Quvanch, Z. (2024). Afghan EFL Teachers’ Perceptions Toward Challenges They Encounter in Implementing CLT in Their Classes. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v3i1.193

Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL Teacher beliefs and Classroom Practices of CLT: A Case Study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11121a

Rahmi, R. (2024). Students’ Silence in EFL Classroom: Contributing Factors and Identities. Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 10(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v10i1.4633

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. In Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (pp. vii–x). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305.001

Savignon, S. J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory Into Practice, 26(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543281

Setyaningrum, T. (2018). Teachers’ Beliefs about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and the Implementation in Classroom Practices. In Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (Vol. 6, Issue 4). http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jphpISSN:2338-8110/eISSN:2442-3890

Tamimy, M. (2015). Consistencies and Inconsistencies Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2249

Too, W. K., & Saimima, E. J. (2019). TEACHER BELIEF AND PRACTICE IN A SCHOOL-BASED ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSROOM IN EASTERN INDONESIA. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 4(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp211-231

Wei, L., Lin, H.-H., & Litton, F. (2018). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in EFL Context in Asia. Asian Culture and History, 10(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v10n2p1

Wesely, P. M., Vyn, R., & Neubauer, D. (2024). Teacher beliefs about instructional approaches: Interrogating the notion of teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821992180

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Citation Check