MONOPOLI KOMUNIKASI DAN BEBAN GANDA: DEKONSTRUKSI PERAN GENDER PADA KOMUNITAS PETANI DI PEDESAAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/jcm.v3i1.10722Keywords:
Double Burden, Gender Performativity, Monopolistic Communication, Power Relations, Rural FarmersAbstract
Gender inequality in the rural agricultural sector is often produced and perpetuated through asymmetrical power relations within the family institution. This study aims to critically examine the interpersonal communication patterns between male and female farmers and to deconstruct the polarization of labor roles in Baku-Baku Village. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach with Judith Butler's Theory of Gender Performativity as the primary analytical framework, empirical data were gathered through participant observation, in-depth interviews with 10 key informants (farmer couples), and document analysis. The data analysis adopted the interactive model by Miles and Huberman, encompassing data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that family communication practices are dominated by a monopolistic communication pattern. Within this interactional structure, male farmers hold absolute discursive control and verbal decision-making authority, systematically repressing egalitarian, deliberative discussion spaces. The dominance of these one-way directives directly leads to the manifestation of a double burden entrapping female farmers. Factually, women are compelled to execute productive labor in the public sphere (cornfields) with a physical intensity equal to that of men, while simultaneously bearing absolute responsibility for domestic reproductive labor. This study concludes that the construction of gender roles in agrarian communities continues to operate oppressively, fundamentally rooted in the obstruction of emancipatory dialogic communication.
References
Abd Rahmad, S. (2023). Peran ganda istri petani padi dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan keluarga di Desa Tallang Ura, Kecamatan Curio, Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian.
Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (Eds.). (2008). Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. SAGE Publications.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dalimoenther, I. (2020). Sosiologi gender. Bumi Aksara.
Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis gender dan transformasi sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.
Handayani, T., & Sugiarti. (2006). Konsep dan teknik penelitian gender. UMM Press.
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Penguin Books.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mosse, J. C. (2018). Gender dan pembangunan (Ed. VI). Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Sihite, R. (2007). Perempuan, kesetaraan dan keadilan suatu tujuan berwawasan gender. PT Grafindo Persada.
Suhra, S. (2013). Kesetaraan gender perspektif Al-Qur’an dan implikasinya terhadap hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Ulum, 13(12), 376.
Sulistyowati, Y. (2020). Kesetaraan gender dalam lingkup pendidikan dan tata sosial. Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 2–3.
Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.
Wood, J. T. (2009). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
You, Y. (2021). Patriarki, ketidakadilan gender, dan kekerasan atas perempuan. Nusamedia.

