A Situational Analysis of EFL Textbook Selection in Thai Public Schools

Niwat Wuttisrisiriporn, Napanit Vinitchevit, Siriluck Usaha

Abstract


It is undeniable that a textbook is a useful resource for teaching and learning. In English language education, especially in EFL countries, EFL teachers use a suitable EFL textbook to facilitate student learning. The present study, therefore, presents the current situation of how EFL textbooks are chosen as a core material in Thai public schools. An online questionnaire was distributed to 30 participants, who were English language teachers working at Thai public schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC). Interviews were also conducted to elicit more data from some of the participants. The findings of the study reveal that an EFL textbook is chosen based on whether it follows the Basic Education Core Curriculum, the textbook content, the textbook quality approval from the Ministry of Education, and price. However, the analysis shows that a systematic evaluation of an EFL textbook is not undertaken before the textbook is used, which can affect the teaching and learning outcomes in an EFL classroom. This paper proposes some recommendations regarding textbook evaluation criteria for those who are in charge of selecting a proper EFL textbook so that they can systematically evaluate and choose a practical textbook for their EFL classroom. It is also hoped to raise Thai EFL teachers’ awareness of the need for a proper textbook evaluation to be undertaken before a textbook is used in an EFL classroom.


Keywords


EFL textbook, situational analysis, textbook evaluation, Thai public schools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alshehri, A. A. (2012). An evaluation of EFL textbooks used for teaching in Saudi intermediate schools. College of Education Journal, 147(1), 849-892.

Byrd, P. & Schuemann, C. (2014). English as a second/foreign language textbooks: How to choose them how to use them. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 380-393). Boston: National Geographic Learning.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Dweikat, K. A. (2011). Investigating teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards the activities and exercises of EFL textbook for tenth grade in Palestine. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Research and Studies, 23(1), 27-79.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42.

Hamidi, H., Bagheri, M., Sarinavaee, M., & Seyyedpour, A. (2016). Evaluation of two general English textbooks: New Interchange 2 vs. Four Corners 3. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(2), 345-351.

Harbi, A. A. (2017). Evaluation study for secondary stage EFL textbook: EFL teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 26-39.

Khodabakhshi, M. (2014). Choose a proper EFL textbook: Evaluation of “Skyline” series. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 959-967.

Khoo, H. S., & Knight, P. (2015). Teachers’ evaluation of KBSM Form 4, 5 English textbooks used in the secondary schools in Penang, Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 128-150.

Laabidi, H., & Nfissi, A. (2016). Fundamental criteria for effective textbook evaluation. EFL Journal, 1(2), 141-159.

Lawrence, W. P. (2011). Textbook evaluation: A framework for evaluating the fitness of the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) Curriculum, (MA thesis, University of Hong Kong).

Litz, D.R.A. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 48(1), 1-53.

McGrath, (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ministry of Education. (2008). Notification on Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008).

Ministry of Education. (2014). Notification on English Language Education Reform Policy. (in Thai)

Office of Basic Education Commission. (2015). Handbook of New National English Language Teaching Aligned with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Bangkok, Thailand: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand Printing House.

Opoku-Amankwa, K., Brew-Hammond, A., & Kofigah, F. (2011). What is in a textbook? Investigating the language and literacy learning principles of the ‘Gateway to English’ textbook series. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 291-310.

Phonhan, P., Praphan, P. W., & Chaiyasuk, I. (2012). An evaluation of My World textbooks regarding the EFL teachers’ perceptions and classroom applications: A Case study of Thai teachers. RMUJ (Humanities and Social Sciences), 6(2), 17-27.

Riazi, A.M. (2003). What textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W.A. Renandya. (Ed.), Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching (pp. 52-68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Center.

Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (2010). Principles of effective materials development. In N, Harwood (Ed.) (2010). English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning & teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143-179.

Ur, P. (2012). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wuttisrisiriporn, N. and Usaha, S. (2019). The development of a localized ELT textbook evaluation checklist: A case study from Thailand. THAITESOL Journal, 32(2), 46–64.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v2i2.1247

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Siriluck Usaha, Niwat Wuttisrisiriporn

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, e-ISSN: 2622-5441 View My Stats