The Invisible Toolbelt: Exploring the Variety of Language Devices in Effective Teacher’s Talk in Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v6i2.9560Keywords:
Teacher’s Talk, Language Devices, Classroom Discourse, Pedagogical Scaffolding, Instructional CommunicationAbstract
Teacher’s talk serves as more than a mere medium for instruction. It is a sophisticated pedagogical instrument that dictates the quality of classroom interaction and knowledge construction. This article explores the invisible toolbelt of language devices, ranging from rhetorical strategies and metaphors to pragmatic markers and corrective feedback which is employed by the teachers to facilitate learning. By synthesizing theories of classroom discourse and sociolinguistics, the study examines how these devices function as scaffolding tools that bridge the gap between complex curricula and students comprehension. The analysis highlights that effective teachers do not just speak but strategically manipulate linguistic variables to manage classroom dynamics, stimulate critical thinking, and foster an inclusive rapport. The findings suggest that conscious mastery of these linguistics tools is a critical component of teacher professional development, as it directly impacts the efficacy of instructional delivery and students engagement.
References
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Harvard University Press.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. Routledge.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Memory. North-Holland Publishing.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Open University Press.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom Interactional Competence. Routledge.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hafirah Patang, Reski Yusrini Islamiah Yunus, Wilda Lestari, Ridha Fadillah Rusdin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
