An Investigation of Teaching English at Bintang Nusantara Learning Centres in Hong Kong: Instructional Method, Problems and Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i2.5591Keywords:
synchronous, asynchronous, technical problems, suggested solutions.Abstract
This study reported the implementation of synchronous and asynchronous classes at Bintang Nusantara Learning Centre, focusing on the use of the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) method to develop students' speaking skills. This research was conducted as a case study, employing qualitative methods such as observations, interviews, and document analysis to gather in-depth data on the teaching and learning processes. The learning process was structured into three interconnected stages: pre-teaching, whilst teaching, and post-teaching, with each stage encompassing various activities designed to enhance student engagement and language proficiency. Despite the careful planning and execution of these activities, both teachers and students faced a range of technical and non-technical challenges throughout the learning process in both online and offline settings. Technical issues included unstable internet connections, inadequate devices (software and hardware), and
varying levels of technological proficiency among both teachers and students, which disrupted the flow of online classes. Non-technical challenges involved a lack of motivation and engagement from students, as well as difficulties in replicating the interactive nature of CLT in a virtual environment. However, teachers and students collaborated to find solutions, such as employing alternative communication tools, adjusting lesson plans to better suit the online format, and providing additional support and encouragement to maintain student motivation. In offline classes, issues related to health protocols and classroom management were addressed by implementing smaller class sizes and ensuring compliance with safety measures. These efforts were critical in mitigating the impact of the challenges, allowing the teaching methodology to remain effective in both online and offline contexts.
References
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Bergmann, Jonathan., & Sams, Aaron. (2014). Flipped learning: gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
Bani, M., & Masruddin, M. (2021). Development of Android-based harmonic oscillation pocket book for senior high school students. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 93-103.
Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001
Bubb, S., & Jones, M. A. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 homeschooling experience: listening to pupils, parents/carers, and teachers. Improving Schools, 23(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220958797
Xhafa, F. (2011). Providing effective feedback, monitoring, and evaluation to online collaborative learning discussions.
Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., Tsai, C. C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers and Education, 57(1), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 6.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, 4th edition.
Demir, I., Şener, E., Karaboğa, H. A., & Başal, A. (2023). Expectations of students from classroom rules: A scenario-based Bayesian network analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 10(1), 424-442.
Eisenring, M. A. A., & Margana, M. (2019). The importance of teacher-students’ interaction in communicative language teaching (Clt). Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 46-54.
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
Fajrul, I., Stkip, F., Kuningan, M., Apsari, Y., Kusumah, R., & Kuningan, S. M. (n.d.). The Challenges of English Teachers in Teaching English at Primary Schools Corresponding email.
Ghufron, M. A., Prayogi, A., & Nurdianingsih, F. (2023). Building Online Learning Community in Synchronous and Asyncous Learning Models. 6(1).
Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
Haliwanda, U. (2021). The Effect of Using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Umar Haliwanda Approach in Teaching Speaking THE EFFECT OF USING THE COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) APPROACH IN TEACHING SPEAKING (Vol. 8, Issue 2).
Hanafi, H., Pomalingo, R., & Bantulu, Y. (2023). Teacher’s feedback on learners’ English writing compositions. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 9(2), 673. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i2.1268
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching, 4th Edition. Pearson Education. Longman.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45(7), 499-506.
Hyytinen, H., Nissinen, K., Kleemola, K., Ursin, J., & Toom, A. (2024). How do self-regulation and effort in test-taking contribute to undergraduate students’ critical thinking performance? Studies in Higher Education, 49(1), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227207
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English: A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 101–111). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Kristina, F., & Yunita, W. (2020). Performances, Problems, and Solutions of Online English Language Teaching at a Vocational High School.
Kumar, N., Antoniraj, S., Jayanthi, S., Mirdula, S., Selvaraj, S., Rajkumar, N., & Senthilkumar, K. R. (2024). Educational technology and libraries support online learning. In AI-Assisted Library Reconstruction (pp. 209–237). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2782-1.ch012
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lohmann, M. J. (2020). Developing Asynchronous Online Discussion Boards to Increase Student Engagement and Learning. ResearchGate.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222.
Masruddin, Hartina, S., Arifin, M. A., & Langaji, A. (2024). Flipped learning: facilitating student engagement through repeated instruction and direct feedback. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2412500.
Madehang, M., Masruddin, M., & Iksan, M. (2024). Reflecting on the Implementation of Online English Learning in Islamic Higher Education: Lecturers and Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of Asian Education, 5(3), 183-197.
Melania, M., Kadir, A., Pamungkas, A. R., & Gupta, S. (2024). Contribution of Non-Formal Education to Improve the Quality of Human Resources. 10(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.2015
Meyer, A., R. D. H., & G. D. (2014). Universal design for learning: theory and practice. MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. In educational technology, research and development.
Mukti, T. W. P. & Ena, O. T. (2018). The use of code switching in general English classes for non-English department students in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 3(2), 185.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015a). Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015b). Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814
Pattinasarany, I. R. I. (2019). Not in Employment, Education, or Training (NEET) Among the Youth in Indonesia: The Effects of Social Activities, Access to Information, and Language Skills on NEET Youth. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v24i1.10308
Prabhath, S., DSouza, A., Pandey, A. K., Pandey, A. K., & Prasanna, L. C. (2022). Changing paradigms in anatomy teaching-learning during a pandemic: Modification of curricular delivery based on student perspectives. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 17(3), 488-497.
Rao, D., & Stuphan, I. (2012). Exploring the potential of role-playing in higher education: development of a typology and teacher guidelines. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 49, 427-436.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: Frontmatter.
Saeed Al-Sobhi, B. M., & Preece, A. S. (2018). Teaching English Speaking Skills to the Arab Students in the Saudi School in Kuala Lumpur: Problems and Solutions. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.1
Sakkir, G., Abduh, A., Andrew, M., Bukhori Muslim, A., & Negeri Makassar, U. (n.d.). The Challenges Faced by Teachers in Teaching English in the Current Curriculum Change.
Trust, T., & W. J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in online learning? Educational Technology. Researchgate, 60.
Varkey, T. C., Varkey, J. A., Ding, J. B., Varkey, P. K., Zeitler, C., Nguyen, A. M., Merhavy, Z. I., & Thomas, C. R. (2023). Asynchronous learning: a general review of best practices for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036
Wahyuni, D. R., Aulia, V., & Febrianno Boer, R. (2018). Instructional Communication Process in Online Learning (School from Home) during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Agustus, 2021(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.21009/JTP2001.6
Yan, Z., Panadero, E., Wang, X., & Zhan, Y. (2023). A systematic review on students’ perceptions of self-assessment: usefulness and factors influencing implementation. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 81.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Dwi Ratnawati, Andang Saehu, Udan Kusmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
