Student and Teacher Perceptions of Student Motivation among Korean University English as a Second Language (ESL) Students

Authors

  • Luke Oliver Henry Allum Hanyang University, Korea, Republic of

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v2i2.1245

Keywords:

ESL, extrinsic, intrinsic, Korea, mastery, motivation, self-efficacy, social goals, student motivation

Abstract

This paper analyses the differences between what teachers say motivates their students and what students say motivate them at a South Korean university. Using motivational constructs developed by Bandura and Maslow in previous motivation studies, it was determined that both teachers and students think teacher characteristics to be the most important variable motivating students, even more important than the student’s own intrinsic motivation. However, there was no agreement between students and teachers on what this looks like specifically in the classroom: teachers prefer to stimulate students’ creative thinking and to help students solve real-world problems, whereas students prefer to learn with digital media, presentations, and quizzes. Teachers and students both believe students to be highly intrinsically motivated, with the caveat that some students come to class lacking intrinsic motivation. This paper is significant in that students report teacher characteristics and instructional methodologies to be of more importance than a student’s intrinsic motivation. This paper reveals that teachers consistently over-rate the importance of teacher characteristics and methodologies on student motivation. 

Author Biography

Luke Oliver Henry Allum, Hanyang University

Assistant Professor of Communication
College English Education Committee (CEEC)
Centre for Creative Convergence Education (CCCE)
Hanyang University 

References

Ames, C., Ames, R., & Felker, D. W, (1977). Effects of competitive reward structure and valence of outcome on children's achievement attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, p. 1-8.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and

Functioning, Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.

Burns, A., and N. Darling. (2002). Peer pressure is not peer influence. The Education Digest 68: p. 4–6.

Colorado School to Centre Partnership, 1999, [viewed here: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TLI9rludJvkJ:hermes.cde.state.co.us/drupal/islandora/object/co%253A7838/datastream/OBJ/download/What_works____Colorado_high_school_senior_survey_1999.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=cz viewed on: 05/07/2017]

Damron, John C. (1995) The Three Faces of Teaching Evaluation, Online Posting john_damron@mindlink.bc.ca, [viewed on 02/07/2017]

Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist,

, 1040–1048

Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual

Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

Gorham & Diane M. Millette (1997). A comparative analysis of

teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes,

Communication Education, 46:4, 245-261.

Kemmis, S. and Wilkinson, M. (1998) Participatory Action Research and the Study of Practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis and P. Weeks (Eds) Action Research in Practice: Partnerships for Social Justice in Education. London: Routledge

Leper, M., Corpus, J., Iynengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.

Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313–327.

Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row

Publishers.

McInerney, D., & Sinclair, K. (1992). Cross cultural model testing: Inventory of

school motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 123–133.

Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Greeman, K.,(2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.

Nolen, Susan Bobbitt ; Nicholls, John G, (1994). A place to begin (again) in research on student motivation: Teachers' beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol.10 (1), pp.57-69 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, p. 73.

Shindler, J., (2009), (Available at: http://web.calstatela.edu/faculty/jshindl/cm/competition.htm) [Accessed: 02/07/2017)

Thompson, B., & Thornton, H. (2002). The transition from extrinsic to intrinsic motivation in the classroom: A first-year experience. Education, 122, 785–792.

Wiesman, J., 2007. A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of motivation in high school classes, Aurora University.

Wigfield, A., J. Eccles, and D. Rodriquez. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. Review of research in education, ed. P. D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad, 73–118. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-28

Citation Check