The use of Mentimeter as a medium for discussion in the EFL classroom: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives
This study investigates the extent of the use of Mentimeter interactive presentation software in classroom discussion, and examines the perspectives of students towards Mentimeter as discussion media. A qualitative method was applied in collecting data from the participants. Three students were interviewed regarding the extent of the use of Mentimeter and their perspective about Mentimeter as discussion media. The findings from the interview results show that Mentimeter is a versatile and simple app that can be utilised to support learning activity. Mentimeter is used mostly for elicitation activities, brainstorming, and for clarification during a lesson. The students acknowledge that the anonymity provided by Mentimeter makes them feel safer in participating in class discussion. In addition, this study could become a reference for teachers using and implementing Mentimeter in the classroom.
Keywords: Mentimeter, class discussions, interactive
Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A Review of key paradigms: positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39–43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338244145
Alwehaibi, H. O. (2015). The impact of using YouTube in EFL classroom on enhancing EFL students’ content learning. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 12(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v12i2.9182
Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Sagala, P. N. (2019). Needs analysis of Blended Learning media to improve students Mathematical creative thinking skills of Mathematics student by using the Mentimeter application. AISTSSE. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287401
Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological., 2, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Cahyani, H., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and technology use Indonesian EFL classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 23(2), 130–148.
Crump, V., & Sparks, J. (2018). Game of phones: Integrating mobile technology into science and engineering classrooms. Universitat Polit`ecnica de Val`encia, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.4995/head18.2018.7971
Fang, X., & Xue-mei, J. (2007). Error analysis and the EFL classroom teaching. US-China Education Review, 4(9), 10–14. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED502653
Gauci, S. A., Dantas, A. M., Williams, D. A., & Kemm, R. E. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 33(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2007
Gerring, J. (2016). Qualitative Methods. Review in Advance, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-092415-024158
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
Govil, P. (2013). Ethical Considerations in Leadership. Handbook of Sexuality Leadership, 1(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274503-19
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Harunasari, S. Y., & Halim, N. (2019). Digital backchannel: Promoting students’ engagement in EFL large class. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9128
Koulouriotis, J. (2011). Ethical Considerations in Conducting Research with Non-native Speakers of English. TESL Canada Journal, 28(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v28i0.1078
Krentler, K. A., & Willis-flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.6.316-321
Lin, P., Hou, H., Wu, S., & Chang, K. (2014). Exploring college students’ cognitive processing patterns during a collab-collaborative problem-solving teaching activity integrating Facebook discussion and simulation tools. The Internet and Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.001
Little, C. (2016). Technology Review: Mentimeter smartphone student response system. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9(13).
Lloyd, V., Gatherer, A., & Kalsy, S. (2006). Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1386–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306293846
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3).
Markel, S. L. (2001). Technology and education online discussion forums: It’s in the response. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2), 1–11.
Martín-blas, T., & Serrano-fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. ELSEIVER, 52, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005
Mayhew, E., Davies, M., Millmore, A., Thompson, L., & Bizama, A. P. (2020). The impact of audience response platform mentimeter on the student and staff learning experience. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/RLT.V28.2397
McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the role of educational technology in the teaching and learning process: A learner-centered perspective. ERIC, 1–13.
Moore, K., & Iida, S. (2010). Students’ perception of supplementary , online activities for Japanese language learning: Groupwork, quiz and discussion tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 966–979.
Musliha, S., & Purnawarman, P. (2020). Using Mentimeter for Eliciting the Students’ Responses in Formative Assessment Practice. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 508, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.255
Nova, M. (2017). Utilizing video for technology integration support in Indonesian EFL classroom: Usages and obstacles. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 2(1), 15–28.
Park, C. N., & Son, J.-B. (2009). Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.5.2.80
Puspa, A., & Imamyartha, D. (2019). Experiences of social science students through online application of Mentimeter in English Milieu. ICEGE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012063
Qamar, K., Riyadi, S., & Wulandari, T. C. (2019). Utilization of Whatsapp application as discussion media in Blended Learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(3), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i3.8412
Rao, Z. (2002). Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. Pergamon, 85–105. www.elsevier.com/locate/system%0Ahttps://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31220230/rao-2.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1535033388&Signature=T%2F3iVq9gNJwoUsNMLlwWQRsIApU%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B filename%3DChinese
Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms in distance education. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(October), 51–59.
Salter, N. P., & Conneely, M. R. (2015). Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement. ELSEIVER, 46, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.037
Sari, A. B. P., Brameswari, C., & Haratikka, H. (2020). Millennial Lecturers’ Attitudes in Incorporating the Online Application in the Efl Classroom. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(3), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i3.p337-347
Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6(3), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275
Urrieta, L., & Hatt, B. (2019). Qualitative Methods and the study of identity and education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.550
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Vallely, K., & Gibson, P. (2018). Engaging students on their devices with Mentimeter. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i2.843
Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5746/leia/11/v2/i1/a09/watkins_wilkins
Witschey, J., Murphy-Hill, E., & Xiao, S. (2013). Conducting interview studies: Challenges, lessons learned, and open questions. 2013 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry, CESI 2013 - Proceedings, 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/CESI.2013.6618471
Wong, P. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2020a). Enhancing writing vocabulary using mentimeter. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.7
Wong, P. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2020b). Enhancing writing vocabulary using Mentimeter. International Journal of Learning, 19(3), 106–122.
Ya-ni, Z. (2007). Communication strategies and foreign language learning. US-China Foreign Language, 5(4), 43–48.
Zainuddin, Z. (2017). First-year college students’ experiences in the EFL flipped classroom: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 133–150.
Article StatisticAbstract view : 59 times
PDF views : 19 times
The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).
If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.
Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.
How To Cite This :
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Fransisca Endang Lestariningsih, Leonardho Jackly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.