A Gricean Maxim Analysis in English Teaching and Learning Process at English Learning Centre

Authors

  • Musdalipa Dalle Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Muh. Hasbi Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Aslan Abidin Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v7i2.8462

Keywords:

EFL Learners, Gricean Maxim, Manner, Quality, Quantity, Relevance, Violation

Abstract

This study explored the violations from Grice’s cooperative maxims within English language classroom interactions at an English Learning Centre. The research aimed to identify which maxim is most frequently violated and to explain the pragmatic functions of these violations. Applying a qualitative research approach, the researcher examined two audio-recorded classroom sessions: recordings were transcribed and analyzed using interactive analysis (Miles, Huberman, & Saldana). Data underwent reduction, classified under the four Gricean maxims (specifically Quantity, Quality, Relation, Manner), and demonstrated through selected extracts. Finding indicated that breaches of Relation Maxim occurred most often (50%), with Manner (21.42%), Quality (19.04%), and Quantity (9.52%) following in order. Data excerpts indicated that many breaches serve pragmatic purposes to create humor and elicit laughter, maintain rapport, control speaker exchange, and allow self-correction instead of signaling communicative breakdown. The study contended that within informal classroom interaction, dynamic interaction frequently emphasized social interaction instead of rigid information transfer, and that sensitivity of maxim flouting is essential to pragmatic competence. The limitations include a small dataset and lack of reported inter-rater validation. The study closed with a recommendation of explicit pragmatic instruction and future studies utilizing larger samples and verification measures to enhance teaching approaches aimed at fostering pragmatic ability among EFL learners.

References

Ajayi, V. O. (2025). A Review on Primary Sources of Data and Secondary Sources of Data. SSRN Electronic Journal, August. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5378785.

Ayunon, C. (2018). Gricean Maxims Revisited in FB Conversation Posts: Its Pedagogical Implications. 13(4), 82–95.

Christ, M., Dewi, S., & Indriani, L. (2020). Unraveling the Use of Quantity Maxim among EFL Learners on Online Classroom Interaction. 1(2), 55–64.

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Educational reserach (planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualtative research). In Cenveo Publisher Services.

Eleftheriou. (2022). Gricean Maxims and Writing Center Tutorial Interactions Eleftheriou. הארץ, 8(8.5.2017), 2003–2005.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. January, 574.

Hidayati. (2018). A Conversational Analysis of Grice’s Maxims Theories on Cooperative Principles at Undergraduate English Students. 11(1), 5–10.

Krause, L., & Vossen, P. (2024). The Gricean Maxims in NLP - A Survey. INLG 2024 - 17th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Proceedings of the Conference, 470–485. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.inlg-main.39

Kurniadi, S. (2021). a Gricean Maxim Analysis in Teaching and Learning Process at Higher Level Education. Jurnal Inotera, 6(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.31572/inotera.vol6.iss2.2021.id145

Muhammad, O. M. A., Qoura, A. A.-S., & Muhammad, H. M. (2022). Using a Program Based on Gricean Maxims Theory for Enhancing EFL Student Teachers’ Conversational Skills. مجلة کلیة التربیة, 19(114), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfe.2022.235077

Reyes, C. D., Ed, M. A., Aquino, A. M., & Ed, D. (n.d.). Demystifying Students’ Observance and Violation of Gricean Maxims in Online ESL Classes. July 2022, 2815.

She, S. (2022). The Influence of Manner Maxim. 215(Icssed), 1408–1411.

Setiadi, M. A., Basri, M., Sakkir, G., Sardi, A., & Rahman, A. (2025). Students Perceptions of AI Based Instruction in Academic Writing Course at an Indonesian Private University. International Journal of Language Education, 1(2), 1-20.

Wicaksono, A. L. (2022). Grice Maxims Breaking in The Teacher and Students’ Oline Interaction: Gender Role Perspective. 14(1), 101–119.

Yule, G. (2020). The study of language. The Psychology of Language, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782942-8

Yusro, A., Sutopo, D., & Yuliasri, I. (2020). The Application of Cooperative Principles in EFL Classroom Interaction: The Case of SMAN 4 Pekalongan. English Education Journal, 10(2), 124–130.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-27

Citation Check