The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Dividend Policy Moderated by Industry Type

Authors

  • Ayu Rahma Dinni 1Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
  • Fajri Adrianto Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
  • M. Fany Alfarisi Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.12419

Keywords:

Environmental Social Governance, Dividend Policy, Industry Type, Manufacturing Company, Data Regression Panel

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on dividend policy, with Industry Type (manufacturing and non-manufacturing companies) as the moderation variable, in non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2011–2025. Method: Dividend policy was measured using the Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR), while Environmental, Social, and Governance performance was measured using ESG scores from the Refinitiv Eikon LSEG database. The sample was determined through purposive sampling of 10 non-financial companies (150 company-year observations), with profitability (Return on Assets), firm size, and leverage as control variables. Data were analyzed using panel data regression with a Fixed Effect Model approach and robust standard error. Results: Social Performance had a significant positive effect on dividend policy, and Industry Type was shown to moderate this influence, where the effect was weaker on manufacturing companies than non-manufacturing companies. Governance Performance had a negative but not significant effect on dividend policy, while Environmental Performance and the effect of Industry Type moderation on Environmental and Governance Performance were not found to have a significant effect. Implications: This study makes a theoretical contribution to enriching the literature on the role of industry types as a moderator of ESG relationships and dividend policies, as well as provides practical implications for company management, investors, and regulators in considering ESG performance, especially the social dimension, as one of the indicators of the sustainability of dividend distribution.

References

Environmental, Social and Governance scores from LSEG. (2024). October.

Al-Malkawi, H. A. N., Rafferty, M., & Pillai, R. (2010). Dividend Policy: A Review of Theories and Empirical Evidence. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 9, 171–200.

Ananzeh, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Alshurafat, H., & Al Amosh, H. (2024a). A cross-country examination on the relationship between cash holding, dividend policies, and the moderating role of ESG ratings. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2300523

Astidhani, D., & Wicaksari, E. A. (2025). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dengan Kebijakan Dividen sebagai Variabel Moderasi. 1(1), 1–14.

Awwalin, W., Saldi, I., Adrianto, F., & Hamidi, M. (2023). Esg and dividend policy in indonesia. 724–734.

Azekkar, Y., Boustta, O., Taghouti, Y., Abidar, B., & El Ouafa, K. (2025). Dividend policy: A comprehensive analysis of classical, neoclassical, and modern theories in corporate finance. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(9), 2025301. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025301

Bhojraj, S., Lee, C. M. C., & Oler, D. K. (2003). What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-679X.2003.00122.x

Business, A. L. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance. May.

Dominique, C., Handajani, E., & Murhadi, W. R. (2025). No Title. 40(1), 148–164.

Ed-Dafali, S., Patel, R., & Iqbal, N. (2023). A bibliometric review of dividend policy literature. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101987

Filman, F. A., & Rahmayanti, D. (2020). The Influence Of Esg On Dividend Policy In The Influence Of Esg On Dividend Policy In. 142–153.

Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2022). Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory.

Hasanah, N., Adrianto, F., & Hamidi, M. (2024). Pengaruh Kinerja Enviromental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dan Volatilitas Laba terhadap Volatilitas Harga Saham Syariah dengan Effective Tax Rate sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index 70 periode Tahun 2018-2023). 6(6), 2942–2956.

Ihsan, Manajemen, Dividen, K., Universitas, B., Kuala, S., Aceh, B., & Ihsan, M. (2024). JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN KEUANGAN Pengaruh Pengungkapan Informasi Lingkungan, Sosial, Tata Kelola, Ekonomi,. 12(1), 56–71.

Kim, J., & Yang, W. (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Research: A Systematic Review of Recent Trends (2020-2024). Sustainable Development, 34(2), 1872–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70370

Kumar, S., et al. (2025). ESG Performance and Dividend Payout: The Moderating Role of ESG Controversies and Legal Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4355

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199

Le, H. (2025). Esg, Corporate Dividend Policy, and the Moderating Role of Industry Growth. November, 1381107.

Lita, R. P., Muthiha, M. S., Rahmi, D. Y., & Mardiah, F. P. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Manajemen dan Bisnis dengan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Berbasis Penelitian di Indonesia.

LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group). (2024). Environmental, Social and Governance Scores from LSEG (Methodology document). https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/sustainable-finance/esg-scores

Matos, P. V., Barros, V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). Does ESG Affect the Stability of Dividend Policies in Europe?

Matuszewska-pierzynka, A., & Pieloch-babiarz, A. (2023). ESG performance and dividend stability of the world's largest enterprises

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433.

Mohamed, A., & Nahia, H. (2024). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Practices on US Firms' Performance: Evidence from the Coronavirus Crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2549–2570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w

Muhammad Shahal Ghibran, & Kurniawan, M. (2024). Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Performance And Dividend Policy In Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 2(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v2i1.136

Nadya, K. (2026). No Title. https://www.idxchannel.com/market-news/10-saham-yang-rajin-bagi-dividen-yield-di-atas-5-persen-cocok-untuk-jangka-panjang/2

Perdana, A. H. (2025). Analisis Pengaruh Esg Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen Perusahaan Di Indonesia. 07, 605–618.

Phill, G., & Terrence, K. (2025). Ending Environmental, Social, and Governance

Zahid, R. M. A., Taran, A., Kaleem, M., & Chersan, I. (2023). Borsa_Istanbul Review ESG, dividend payout policy and the moderating role of audit quality: Empirical evidence from Western Europe. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.012

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Dinni, A. R., Adrianto, F., & Alfarisi, M. F. (2026). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Dividend Policy Moderated by Industry Type. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.12419

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.