The Struggle and Resistance against the limitations of women’s roles in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice

Authors

  • Grace Reynaputri Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ruly Indra Dermawan Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10040

Keywords:

Feminism, Literary Criticism, Patriarchal Society, Resistance, Women’s Roles

Abstract

This study explores the struggle and resistance to the limitations imposed on women’s roles in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, with a specific focus on the character of Elizabeth Bennet. Set in a patriarchal society where social expectations and marriage norms largely shape women’s identities, the novel portrays Elizabeth as a woman who challenges traditional gender norms. This study uses feminist literary criticism and a qualitative descriptive methodology, specifically Simone de Beauvoir’s concept of The Other, to analyze how women are positioned as secondary subjects within a male-dominated social structure. The data were collected through close reading and textual analysis of narrative descriptions and dialogues related to women’s roles, marriage, and independence in the novel. The findings reveal that Elizabeth Bennet experiences various forms of social pressure to conform to traditional expectations, especially regarding marriage as an opportunity to secure a place in society and financial security. However, she resists these limitations by asserting her independence, valuing emotional integrity, and rejecting marriages that compromise her principles. Her critical attitude toward social hierarchy and her refusal of a financially secure yet loveless marriage show her resistance to patriarchal limitations. This study concludes that Elizabeth Bennet represents an early form of feminist awareness, representing the rights of women and self-expression in a socially restricted environment.

References

Abduh, N. K., & Masruddin, M. (2023). Structural Studies of Robert Stanton in The Folklore of Luwu (Worongporong dan Pariama). IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(1), 117-126.

Al-Quraishi, M. (2024). Women’s agency and patriarchal constraints in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Journal of Gender and Cultural Studies, 12(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.48047/jgcs.2024.12.1.45

Austen, J. (1813 & 2003). Pride and prejudice. London: Penguin Classics.

Barry, P. (2009). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory (3rd ed.). Manchester University Press.

Beauvoir, S. de. (1949). The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.

Chang, L. (2014). Female identity and social expectations in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(7), 89–96. Retrieved from https://www.ijhssnet.com/journal/Vol_4_No_7_May_2014/10.pdf

Damayanti, R., & Setyabudi, A. (2024). Women as the “Other”: A Feminist Analysis of Elizabeth Bennet in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Journal of English Literature and Cultural Studies, 6(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.22146/jelcs.2024.67891

Guo, Y. (2024). Marriage and female independence in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Studies in English Literature and Language, 28(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3968/13425

Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics—South End Press.

Kanez, S. (2012). Women’s struggle for independence in Jane Austen’s novel. English Literary Review, 2(1), 45-52.

Kenjaboyeva, D., & Ne’matova, M. (2025). Feminist perspectives on women’s consciousness in classic English novels. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation, 8(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2025.8.1.6

Luo, X. (2024). Marriage values in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice: A feminist interpretation. Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 14(3), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2024.070307

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6

Mustika, D., & Lestari, S. (2021). Feminist awareness in Jane Austen’s female characters. Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.30605/jells.v5i2.1023

Nurilloyevna, M. D., & Axrorovna, S. M. (2025). Representation of female independence in English literature. Central Asian Journal of Literature and Culture, 3(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17605/cajlc.v3i1.105

Rahman, A. (2020). Patriarchal structures and women’s social roles in nineteenth-century British literature. Journal of Feminist Literary Studies, 9(1), 33–41.

Setiawan, E. I., Masruddin, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). Semiotic Analysis and Ethnography Study on the Implementation of Local Wisdom in Economic Field at Luwu Society. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(2), 1912-1925.

Tripathi, L. (2018). Feminist journey and emotional development of female characters in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 3(4), 560–565. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.3.4.32

Tyson, L. (2015). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

UN Women. (2023). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2023. Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publication/2023/09/progress-on-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-gender-snapshot-2023

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

Citation Check