Language Preference and Diglosic Practice Among Islamic Boarding School Students: A Case Study in Sociolinguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10050Keywords:
Language preference; Diglosic practice; Arabic dominance; Islamic boarding school.Abstract
This study investigates language preference and diglosic practices among students at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia, where Arabic, English, and Indonesian coexist in daily communication. Language choice is shaped by sociocultural domains and institutional norms (Fishman, 1972; Holmes, 2013). Although Arabic and English are officially promoted, their use reflects unequal functional distribution consistent with classical diglossia (Ferguson, 1959). Using a qualitative case study design (Creswell & Poth, 2018), data were collected through non-participant observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. Data were analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s (2014) interactive model. Findings indicate the dominance of Arabic in religious activities and peer interaction, while English is largely limited to classroom instruction. Arabic functions as a high-status variety linked to religious authority and institutional ideology (Ferguson, 1959), whereas English occupies a restricted pedagogical role shaped by language policy and symbolic capital (Bourdieu, 1991; Spolsky, 2004). The study highlights how institutional ideology sustains diglosic hierarchies in Islamic boarding school contexts.
References
Putri, A. H. & Thoyyibah, A. (2024). Exploring Arabic Diglossia in Learning Kalam: Bridging the Gap in Daily Communication. Journal of Arabic Linguistics and Education (ALSINATUNA). Vol. 9 No. 2, 184-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v9i2.7076
Artika, C., Safitri, A., Norjannah, N., Azhar, N. F. N. & Banseng, S. (2024). Students Perception of Diglossia Phenomenon in Classroom. International Journal of Education, Information, Technology and Others (IJEIT) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12630132
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Multilingual Matters. http://www.multilingual-matters.com
Cashman, H. (2025. Language preference and group membership in bilingual talk in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 37(3):301-315. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223159432
Coulmas, F. (2013). Sociolinguistics: The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139794732
Cope, D. G. (2014) Methods and Meanings: Credibility and Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum 41(1):89-91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259462427
Daniëls, H. (2018). Diglossia: A language ideological approach. Pragmatics, 28(2), 185-216.
Firmansyah, Pratama, I, P, Munir. (2024). Symbolic Meanings in the Social Interaction of Santri in the Pesantren Environment. Al-Hayat Journal of Islamic Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i3.698
Fishman, J. A. 1972. Domains and the relationship between micro- and macro sociolinguistics. In: J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, eds. Directions in sociolinguistics. The ethnography of speaking. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 407-434 [originally 1971, several reprints]
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Integrating English language teaching (ELT) into Islamic boarding schools: A review of strategy and challenges. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy (JELPA), 1(2), 64-78.
Gammelgaard, B. (2017). The Qualitative Case Study.The International Journal of Logistics Management (2017) 28 (4): 910–913. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-09-2017-023
Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: a social psychological approach to language maintenance. International journal of the sociology of language, 1987(68).
Haberland, H. (2005). Domains and domain loss. Book?? The Consequences of Mobility: Linguistic and Sociocultural Contact Zones? 227-237.
Harnika, L., Abidin, Z., Maulana, M. F., Saputri, S., Salsabila, A. M., & Azim, A. (2024). Impact of Linguistic Environment on Speaking Skills of Female Students at the Arabic Language Center Islamic Boarding School in Indonesia. Journal of Arabic Language Learning and Teaching (JALLT), 2(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.23971/jallt.v2i2.180
Indrasanti, L. & Wita, F. R. (2023). Language, Religion, and Identity Negotiation in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Tahuri Journal. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol20issue2page155-172
Iqbal, H, (2022). The influence of language environment in islamic boarding school on the achievement of English-speaking skill http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/38533/
Jumadi, Taqwiem, A. Mu’in, F. Noortyani, R. Listia, R. & Rizky, A. (2025). Language Choice in Multilingual Speech Communities: A Sociolinguistic Study in the Wetland Area, Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan. Register Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v17i2.404-434
Korstjens, I. & Moser, A. (2017). Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European Journal of General Practice. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8816392/
Leech, K, T. (2007). Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious: (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 2004. pp. xii, 268) Joseph, J. (2004). https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0728
Ma’arif, S,. & Rosikh, F,. (2025) Integrating Arabic Language Learning and Islamic Religious Education for Religious Character Formation. Ummul Qura: Jurnal Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat (INSUD) Lamongan. https://doi.org/10.55352/uq
Munawaro, S., Nurfatimah, D., Azhar, M. S. & Riski, M. J. (2025) Role of Diglossia in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Al-Irsyad Journal of Education Science (AIJES). https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v4i2.197
Minarti, S, Rohimiya, F, S, Wardi, M (2022) The Distinctive Character in the Modernization of Islamic Education Through Curriculum and Learning Management. Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.33650.pjp.v9i2.4419
Muttaqin, I, Bakheit, B, M, Hasanah, M. (2024) Language Environment for Islamic Boarding School Student Language Acquisition: Capturing Language Input, Interaction, and Output https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i3.624
Nur, M. M. (2021). Pesantren Radiness for English Program. English Education Journal (EEJ). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354919858
Nurman, M, Retnaningdyah, P, & Anam, S, (2025) A case Study on Cultural Awareness among Bilingual Learners at an Indonesian Islamic Boarding School. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v8i2.13899
Putra, H, M., & Rafiqah, L. (2024). The Role of Leadership in Shaping Social Dynamics within Pesantren Communities. Edu Spectrum: Journal of Multidimensional Education, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.70063/eduspectrum.v1i2.37
Rahman, F., Al-Nahdi, A., & Zurriyati, Z. (2023). The (in) famous English language policy in pesantren: What we already know and what remains unknown. Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan), 7(2), 165-182.
Rahmawati, S., Abunawas, K., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Peran bi’ah lughawiyyah dalam menunjang pembelajaran bahasa arab di pondok pesantren Darul Huffadh Tuju-Tuju kab.Bone. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 11(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24252/ip.v11i1.29670
Ruslan, Ismatullah, Luthfiyah,. Khaerudin, & Ramadhan, S,.(2024). Bilingual Education to Improve Understanding of Aqidah at Salafi Islamic Boarding Schools. Journal of Islamic Education https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i4.19
Siregar, R. S. (2025) Arabic Language Learning Culture in Salaf Islamic Boarding Schools: An Ethnographic Study of Linguistic Punishment Practices and Traditions. Etnopedagogi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://journal.mgedukasia.or.id/index.php/etnopedagogi
Setiyadi, A., Hidayah, N., Wahyudi, M., & Maha, M. (2023). Bī’ah Lughawiyah Programs in Arabic Language Learning to Improve Student’s Arabic Speaking Skills. Ta’lim Al-’Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban, 7(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpba.v7i1.24173
Wahyuningrum, F. (2020). An Analysis Of Arabic-english Code Mixing In Daily Communication at Pondok Pesantren Al-Munawwarah Pekanbaru (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Wibowo, A. (2025). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif: Pengertian, Jenis, dan Penerapannya. tSurveyid. https://tsurvey.id/portal
Wulandari, D., & Noor, A. (2020). Foreign Language Learning, Environment, and their Influence on Moslem Teenage Learners’ Identity. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 07043. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207043
Woltran, F., & Schwab, S. (2025). Language as a distinguishing feature or common ground? A participatory study on manifestations of intergroup relations in the lived experiences of multilingual students. Linguistics and Education, 85, 101379.
Zahra, W, A. (2025). Quality Education through Pesantren, Madrasahs, and Islamic Schools in Globalization Dynamics. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies. DOI:10.21070/ijis. v13i3.1776
Zarkasyi, H. F. (2020). Imam Zarkasyi’s Modernization of Pesantren in Indonesia (A Case Study of Darussalam Gontor). QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 8(1), 161–200. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i1.5760
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Masnawati, Andi Rachmawati Syarif, Syarif Amin, Ibrahim Manda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
