Investigating the Relationship Between Metacognitive Awareness and Critical Reading Performance among Undergraduate EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10206Keywords:
Critical Reading; EFL students; metacognitive awareness; reading strategiesAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between metacognitive awareness and critical reading performance among undergraduate EFL students in Indonesia. The research addresses the need to better understand how students’ awareness of reading strategies contributes to their ability to engage in higher-order reading processes. A quantitative correlational research design was employed, involving 150 undergraduate students from the English Education program at UIN Alauddin Makassar. Data were collected using the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory-Revised (MARSI-R) to measure students’ metacognitive awareness and a researcher-developed critical reading test consisting of 25 multiple-choice items to assess critical reading performance. The data were analyzed using Pearson Product-Moment Correlation. The results revealed a statistically significant and strong positive relationship between metacognitive awareness and critical reading performance (r = 0.971, p < 0.01), indicating that students with higher levels of metacognitive awareness tend to achieve better results in critical reading tasks. These findings suggest that metacognitive awareness plays an important role in supporting students’ ability to analyze, evaluate, and interpret texts effectively. The study highlights the importance of integrating metacognitive strategy instruction into reading pedagogy to enhance students’ critical reading skills. However, the findings are limited to the specific context of this study and should be interpreted within its scope. Future research is recommended to explore additional variables and employ different research designs to further examine this relationship.
References
Ahmed, R. M. (2020). Investigating EFL Learners’ Awareness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Students in Different Disciplines. Arab World English Journal, 11(September), 294–304.
Alamer, A., & Alsagoafi, A. (2023). Construct validation of the revised Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory ( MARSI-R ) and its relation to learning effort and reading achievement. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 125–149.
Coskun, D. (2024). The Effect of Metacognitive Reading Strategies Training on EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Middle East Technical University.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Educational Research (Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research) (6th ed.). Pearson.
Dang, V. T. T. (2024). Metacognitive Reading Strategy Usage among Vietnamese University Students and its Relationship with Reading Comprehension Performance. REFLections, 31(3), 925–943.
Dinçer, B., & Çilek, G. (2022). The Analysis of the Relation Between Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies and Critical Thinking Attiude of Pre-Service Classroom Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.4
El Madani, E. M., Larouz, M., Fagroud, M., Saadallah, Z., & Barebzi, J. (2024). Exploring the Interplay of Metacognitive Awareness and Reading Proficiency: A Study among Moroccan University EFL Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 9(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9i2.1322
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Jang, E., Seo, Y. S., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2025). The mediating effect of metacognitive strategies on the relationship between reading motivation and reading achievement in multilingual and english-dominant students. Reading and Writing, 38(5), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10555-2
Keyif, Z. (2021). Metacognitive Strategies and Critical Reading. Maltepe University.
Manh Do, H., & Le Thu Phan, H. (2021). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies on Second Language Vietnamese Undergraduates. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory ( MARSI ) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2023). The EFL Students ’ Viewpoints on the Contributing Critical Reading Strategies in Critical Reading Comprehension Class. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.210 93/ijeltal.v8i2.1629
Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2025). Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Their Impact on Comprehension: Insights from Rural EFL Learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908
Wallace, C. (2003). Critical Reading in Language Education (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nabila Syahrani, Nella Yuadiah Ningsih, Siti Ananda Zalzabila Mudjarab, Munir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
