Marriage as a Mechanism of Power in Regency Era in Quinn’s Bridgerton the Duke and I

Authors

  • Putri Ayresti Sukmaningsih English Literature, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah
  • Rahayu Puji Haryanti English Literature, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10237

Keywords:

Liberal Feminism; Marriage; Power Mechanism; Regency Era, Women

Abstract

This study examines marriage as a mechanism of power in the Regency Era in Julia Quinn’s novel Bridgerton: The Duke and I (2000). It explores the representation of marriage in the novel, the construction of power through marriage, and the implications of this construction for women’s positions. This study employs a qualitative approach through close textual analysis using John Stuart Mill’s liberal feminist theory. The primary data are obtained from the novel, and the secondary data are taken from journal articles, books, and other sources related to the topic. The findings show that marriage is not just an individual’s relationship, but it is also portrayed as a social tradition, a life purpose, a continuation of lineage, and an economic status. Through its romantic narrative, marriage eventually operates as a form of power in Regency society through social pressure, reproductive obligations, legal and economic authority, and limitations on women’s life choices. This power construction shapes women’s positions, thus leading some female characters to resist rather than passively accept this marriage power. This study suggests that marriage in the novel is not only depicted as a romantic relationship but also as a mechanism of power that shapes women’s lives.

Author Biography

Rahayu Puji Haryanti, English Literature, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah

Lecturer in the English Literature Study Program

References

Austen, J. (1816). Pride and Prejudice. United Kingdom: T. Egerton.

Austen, J. (2003). Sense and Sensibility (968th ed.). United Kingdom: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1811, T. Egerton)

Badjinki, T. (2019). Stereotypical Gender Roles and New Construct of Marriage in Pride and Prejudice. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.070100

Benton, R. A., & Keister, L. A. (2017). The lasting effect of intergenerational wealth transfers: Human capital, family formation, and wealth. Social Science Research, 68, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.09.006

Bohang, M. B. A., Magfirah, S., & Nugroho, D. A. (2025). The Social Condition of England’s Women in 18th Century Reflected in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43533

Camilo, A. L. de J., & Menezes, J. C. (2024). Book 1 and season 1 from the series “Bridgerton” intersemiotic translation and ethnic-racial issues | TradTerm. 46, 72–86.

Cornell Law School. (1999). Marriage and Family Code Chapter 5: Rights and Obligations of the Spouses. LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/gender-justice/resource/marriage_and_family_code_chapter_5_rights_and_obligations_of_the_spouses

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches(5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dashwood, R. J., and Lipsedge, K. (2021) Women and Property in the Long Eighteenth Century. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 44: 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.12796.

Fatharani, E. B. (2022). Simon’s Hysteria in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I. Instucon, 1(1), 237–249.

Garfield, Z. H., Ringen, E. J., Buckner, W., Medupe, D., Wrangham, R. W., & Glowacki, L. (2023). Norm violations and punishments across human societies. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.7

Gayà, A. L. (2022). Bridgerton: A Comparative Analysis of Sexuality, Class, and Race from a Gender Perspective in The Duke & I and its Netflix’s Adaptation. Universitate de les Illes Balears.

Harris, T.M. & Sanders, M.S. (2023). Bridgerton. In The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication (eds T.K. Nakayama and R.T. Halualani). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119745426.ch34

Hashmi, A. S., Shah, S. K., & Nawaz, M. S. (2023). Bridgerton by Julia Quinn as an Inter-Text of Female Universal Voice: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Russian Law Journal, 11(5). https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2864

Husain, S. W. J. (2020). Pembentukan Posisi Perempuan dalam Novel Pride and Prejudice Karya Jane Austen | Buana Gender: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak. 5(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v4i2.2670

Isabell, Y. B. (2023). Adapting Identities and Teaching Ethics: Bridgerton’s Impact on Race, Gender and Narrative Insights in Film and Series [Thesis, Stockholm University]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-217692

Ivana, N. D. (2023). Women Struggle Against Patriarchal Structure in Bridgerton Series Season One [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Laeli, W., Sumiyadi, Rizkina, T., & Gasanti, R. (2024). Nilai Positif dan Cerminan Kehidupan Masa Kini dalam Cerpen Bepak Karya Kartini (Kajian Sosiologi Sastra). Journal of Education for The Language and Literature of Indonesia, 2(2), 86-97 Halaman. https://doi.org/10.15575/jelli.v2i2.996

Luque, N. P. (2023). Regency Romances over Time: A Comparison between Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I and Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility. [Thesis, Universidade da Coruna]. http://hdl.handle.net/2183/34197

Marrero, L. L. (2016). Courtship and Marriage in the Work of Jane Austen [Dissertation]. Universidade De Santiago De Compostela.

Merriam-Webster. (2026). Power. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/power

Mill, J. S. (2007). The Subjection of Women. United Kingdom: Book Jungle. (Original work published 1869, Longmans)

Netflix. (n.d.). Netflix’s Most Watched Series and Movies Ever. Netflix. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/what-to-watch/most-watched-series-movies-of-all-time-hours-watched/

Noor, R. (2019). Fungsi Sosial-Kultural Sastra: Memajukan Kebudayaan dan Mengembangkan Peradaban. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 14(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.14.2.206-216

Omer, M. O. M., & Yousif, Y. E. A. (2026). Marriage and Social Structure in Pride and Prejudice: A Critical Synthesis. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijllc.6.2.2

Pokulevska, A., & Nazaryan, A. (2024). The Transformation of Contextual Substitution in the Translation of Julia Quinn’s «The Duke and I» into German and Ukrainian: A comparative aspect. ResearchGate, 361. https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2024-2(361)-120-126

Quinn, J. (2000). Bridgerton: The Duke and I. United States: Avon Books.

Rusdianti, A. (2023). The Impact of Instability of Gossip’s Meaning to The characterizations in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I Novel: A Derridean Deconstruction Perspectives. 26(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.24257/atavisme.v26i2.934.65-79

Taddeo, J. A. (2023). The Bridgerton effect: Introduction to a Special Issue on Netflix’s TV series. Journal of Popular Television, The, 11(Bridgerton), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv_00089_2

Vitayala, N., & Candraningrum, D. (2024). Gender Inequality in Bridgerton The Duke and I (2000) by Julia Quinn: A Feminist Perspective [Thesis]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Widayanti. (2021). Romanticization On Women’s Ignorance And Innocence Of Marital Act In Julia Quinn The Duke And I [Doctoral, Universitas Negeri Jakarta]. http://repository.unj.ac.id/19384/

Zhou, W. (2016). Women on the Road: Women in Patriarchal Society in Sense and Sensibility. English Language and Literature Studies, 6, 70–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n3p70

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19