Marriage as a Mechanism of Power in Regency Era in Quinn’s Bridgerton the Duke and I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10237Keywords:
Liberal Feminism; Marriage; Power Mechanism; Regency Era, WomenAbstract
This study examines marriage as a mechanism of power in the Regency Era in Julia Quinn’s novel Bridgerton: The Duke and I (2000). It explores the representation of marriage in the novel, the construction of power through marriage, and the implications of this construction for women’s positions. This study employs a qualitative approach through close textual analysis using John Stuart Mill’s liberal feminist theory. The primary data are obtained from the novel, and the secondary data are taken from journal articles, books, and other sources related to the topic. The findings show that marriage is not just an individual’s relationship, but it is also portrayed as a social tradition, a life purpose, a continuation of lineage, and an economic status. Through its romantic narrative, marriage eventually operates as a form of power in Regency society through social pressure, reproductive obligations, legal and economic authority, and limitations on women’s life choices. This power construction shapes women’s positions, thus leading some female characters to resist rather than passively accept this marriage power. This study suggests that marriage in the novel is not only depicted as a romantic relationship but also as a mechanism of power that shapes women’s lives.
References
Austen, J. (1816). Pride and Prejudice. United Kingdom: T. Egerton.
Austen, J. (2003). Sense and Sensibility (968th ed.). United Kingdom: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1811, T. Egerton)
Badjinki, T. (2019). Stereotypical Gender Roles and New Construct of Marriage in Pride and Prejudice. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.070100
Benton, R. A., & Keister, L. A. (2017). The lasting effect of intergenerational wealth transfers: Human capital, family formation, and wealth. Social Science Research, 68, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.09.006
Bohang, M. B. A., Magfirah, S., & Nugroho, D. A. (2025). The Social Condition of England’s Women in 18th Century Reflected in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i1.43533
Camilo, A. L. de J., & Menezes, J. C. (2024). Book 1 and season 1 from the series “Bridgerton” intersemiotic translation and ethnic-racial issues | TradTerm. 46, 72–86.
Cornell Law School. (1999). Marriage and Family Code Chapter 5: Rights and Obligations of the Spouses. LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/gender-justice/resource/marriage_and_family_code_chapter_5_rights_and_obligations_of_the_spouses
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches(5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dashwood, R. J., and Lipsedge, K. (2021) Women and Property in the Long Eighteenth Century. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 44: 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.12796.
Fatharani, E. B. (2022). Simon’s Hysteria in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I. Instucon, 1(1), 237–249.
Garfield, Z. H., Ringen, E. J., Buckner, W., Medupe, D., Wrangham, R. W., & Glowacki, L. (2023). Norm violations and punishments across human societies. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.7
Gayà, A. L. (2022). Bridgerton: A Comparative Analysis of Sexuality, Class, and Race from a Gender Perspective in The Duke & I and its Netflix’s Adaptation. Universitate de les Illes Balears.
Harris, T.M. & Sanders, M.S. (2023). Bridgerton. In The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication (eds T.K. Nakayama and R.T. Halualani). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119745426.ch34
Hashmi, A. S., Shah, S. K., & Nawaz, M. S. (2023). Bridgerton by Julia Quinn as an Inter-Text of Female Universal Voice: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Russian Law Journal, 11(5). https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2864
Husain, S. W. J. (2020). Pembentukan Posisi Perempuan dalam Novel Pride and Prejudice Karya Jane Austen | Buana Gender: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak. 5(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v4i2.2670
Isabell, Y. B. (2023). Adapting Identities and Teaching Ethics: Bridgerton’s Impact on Race, Gender and Narrative Insights in Film and Series [Thesis, Stockholm University]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-217692
Ivana, N. D. (2023). Women Struggle Against Patriarchal Structure in Bridgerton Series Season One [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Laeli, W., Sumiyadi, Rizkina, T., & Gasanti, R. (2024). Nilai Positif dan Cerminan Kehidupan Masa Kini dalam Cerpen Bepak Karya Kartini (Kajian Sosiologi Sastra). Journal of Education for The Language and Literature of Indonesia, 2(2), 86-97 Halaman. https://doi.org/10.15575/jelli.v2i2.996
Luque, N. P. (2023). Regency Romances over Time: A Comparison between Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I and Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility. [Thesis, Universidade da Coruna]. http://hdl.handle.net/2183/34197
Marrero, L. L. (2016). Courtship and Marriage in the Work of Jane Austen [Dissertation]. Universidade De Santiago De Compostela.
Merriam-Webster. (2026). Power. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/power
Mill, J. S. (2007). The Subjection of Women. United Kingdom: Book Jungle. (Original work published 1869, Longmans)
Netflix. (n.d.). Netflix’s Most Watched Series and Movies Ever. Netflix. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/what-to-watch/most-watched-series-movies-of-all-time-hours-watched/
Noor, R. (2019). Fungsi Sosial-Kultural Sastra: Memajukan Kebudayaan dan Mengembangkan Peradaban. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 14(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.14.2.206-216
Omer, M. O. M., & Yousif, Y. E. A. (2026). Marriage and Social Structure in Pride and Prejudice: A Critical Synthesis. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijllc.6.2.2
Pokulevska, A., & Nazaryan, A. (2024). The Transformation of Contextual Substitution in the Translation of Julia Quinn’s «The Duke and I» into German and Ukrainian: A comparative aspect. ResearchGate, 361. https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2024-2(361)-120-126
Quinn, J. (2000). Bridgerton: The Duke and I. United States: Avon Books.
Rusdianti, A. (2023). The Impact of Instability of Gossip’s Meaning to The characterizations in Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton: The Duke and I Novel: A Derridean Deconstruction Perspectives. 26(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.24257/atavisme.v26i2.934.65-79
Taddeo, J. A. (2023). The Bridgerton effect: Introduction to a Special Issue on Netflix’s TV series. Journal of Popular Television, The, 11(Bridgerton), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv_00089_2
Vitayala, N., & Candraningrum, D. (2024). Gender Inequality in Bridgerton The Duke and I (2000) by Julia Quinn: A Feminist Perspective [Thesis]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Widayanti. (2021). Romanticization On Women’s Ignorance And Innocence Of Marital Act In Julia Quinn The Duke And I [Doctoral, Universitas Negeri Jakarta]. http://repository.unj.ac.id/19384/
Zhou, W. (2016). Women on the Road: Women in Patriarchal Society in Sense and Sensibility. English Language and Literature Studies, 6, 70–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n3p70
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putri Ayresti Sukmaningsih, Rahayu Puji Haryanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
