The Application of Content and Language Integrated Learning to Improve Students’ Achievements in Academic Vocabularies and Scientific Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10249Keywords:
Academic Vocabularies, CLIL, Journal Articles, Scientific WritingAbstract
This study aimed to improve students' achievement in academic vocabulary and scientific writing through the implementation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach and to identify the challenges encountered by students at SMA Terpadu Pondok Pesantren Nurul Huda during its implementation. CLIL was selected because it integrates content learning with language development, allowing students to acquire academic language while engaging in meaningful subject-related tasks. The study employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design consisting of two cycles involving planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were senior high school students with basic English communicative competence. Data were collected through tests, classroom observations, and interviews and analyzed using quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in students’ academic vocabulary mastery and scientific writing skills following the CLIL intervention. Mean scores increased from 60.5 in the pre-test to 71.7 in the progress test and 80.3 in the post-test, while the paired-samples t-test showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test results (p < 0.05). Students also demonstrated greater confidence in using domain-specific vocabulary, organizing ideas, and constructing coherent scientific abstracts. Nevertheless, they continued to experience difficulties in comprehending more complex texts from Scopus-indexed journals due to limited vocabulary range and insufficient academic reading skills. The findings suggest that CLIL can serve as an effective pedagogical approach for English teachers seeking to strengthen students' academic literacy through integrated language and content instruction. Overall, this study contributes to EFL teaching by providing evidence that structured CLIL implementation can enhance academic vocabulary development and support students' early engagement with scientific writing practices.
References
Arnó-Macià, E., & Mancho-Barés, G. (2015). The Role of Content and Language in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at University: Challenges and Implications for ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.007
Breezee, R., & Azparren Legarre, M. P. (2021). Understanding Change in Practice: Identity and Emotions in Teacher Training for Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). International Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 25–44. https://doi.org/academica-e.unavarra.es/bitstreams/605a8b11-81ae-428e-8fc1-6507216c7073/download
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL–A Pedagogical Approach from The European Perspective. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2nd ed., Vol. 4). Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media LLC.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and Theoretical Underpinnings of Bilingual Education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748116300104 (Original work published 1981)
Cummins, J. (1999). BICS and CALP: Clarifying The Distinction. (Vol. 1). ERIC.
Cummins, J. (2017). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education (In: Street, pp. 59–71). Cham: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_6
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dzulkurnain, M. I., Irianto, S., Rasmita, R., Uktolseja, L. J., Hartono, W. J., & Manurung, T. (2024). Understanding The Benefits and Challenges of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in English Education: A Literature Synthesis. Journal on Education, 6(04), 18941–18953. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5876
Ismayanti, D., Said, Y. R., Usman, N., & Nur, M. I. (2024). The Students Ability in Translating Newspaper Headlines into English A Case Study. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 108-131.
Luis Banegas, D. (2018). Putting CLIL into Practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1146425
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Nikula, T. (2015). Hands-on Tasks in CLIL Science Classrooms as Sites for Subject-Specific Language Use and Learning. System, 54, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.003
Rachmajanti, S., & Anugerahwati, M. (2019). Predictors of The Students’English Achievement at Lower Secondary School: CLIL Context. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on The Teaching & Learning of English, 30(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i1/72-87
Stephen Kemmis, S. K., & Robin McTaggart, R. M. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Turner, M., & Fielding, R. (2021). CLIL Teacher Training and Teachers’ Choices: Exploring Planned Language Use in The Australian Context. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1792920
Wolff, D. (2009). 20. Content and Language Integrated Learning. In Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning (p. 545). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Achmad Mukhlisin, Ari Purnawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
