Factors Influencing Vocabulary Learning Difficulties Among Students in Inclusive English Classroom: An English Teacher’s Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10258Keywords:
EFL, inclusive education, Teacher's perception, Vocabulary, Vocabulary learningAbstract
This study investigates the factors influencing students’ limited vocabulary knowledge as an observable manifestation of vocabulary learning difficulties (VLD) in an inclusive English classroom. Vocabulary learning difficulties remain a significant challenge in EFL contexts, particularly in classrooms with diverse learning needs. This study aims to explore how these difficulties are perceived and addressed from the perspective of an English teacher. A qualitative descriptive case study design was employed, involving one English teacher in a Grade 7 inclusive classroom at an Islamic integrated junior high school in Medan. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview and classroom observations and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that vocabulary learning difficulties are shaped by the interaction between internal and external factors. Internally, students’ motivation, memory, learning interest, and individual learning pace significantly affect their ability to retain and use vocabulary. Students with limited vocabulary foundations experience difficulties in memorizing, pronouncing, and expressing vocabulary, particularly in speaking and translating activities. Externally, instructional practices, classroom conditions, and exposure to English influence vocabulary development. Although the teacher applied supportive strategies such as repetition, contextualization, and direct practice, challenges such as limited use of visual media, diverse student needs, and time constraints hindered optimal vocabulary learning. The study highlights that vocabulary learning difficulties in inclusive classrooms should be understood as a contextual and interactional phenomenon rather than solely as individual deficits. These findings emphasize the importance of adaptive teaching strategies and supportive learning environments in addressing vocabulary learning difficulties.
References
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
Baharudin, H., et al. (2025). Teachers' perspectives on vocabulary learning difficulties in inclusive EFL classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching, 15(2), 45–62.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Eun, B. (2016). Sociocultural perspectives on inclusive education in EFL contexts. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(5), 512–528.
Fathurizki, F., et al. (2025). Internal and external factors influencing vocabulary acquisition in EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 29(1), 78–95.
Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.
Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286–294.
Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Longman.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
Panjaitan, N. D., et al. (2025). Challenges in applying vocabulary in communicative EFL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 59(1), 112–130.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Rohmatillah, R. (2017). Vocabulary memorization and differentiation in EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 201–215.
Sahnan, B., & Daulay, S. H. (2025). Developing students’ vocabulary by using build-a-sentence: Teachers’ perspective. SCOPE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 692-698.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Language Teaching, 53(1), 1–17.
Teng, F. (2020). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 482–502.
Teng, F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of vocabulary learning strategies. System, 97, 102431.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254
Wahyuni, S., et al. (2021). Pronunciation, spelling, and meaning comprehension in EFL vocabulary learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1456–1470.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tisya Amalia Putri Sitorus, Yani Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
