The Sarcastic Edge: How Impoliteness Strategies Construct Rhetorical Authority in the 7th IUDC Arabic Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10300Keywords:
Debate, Face, ImpolitenessAbstract
Debate requires individuals to think critically, systematically, and strategically when selecting linguistic devices to defend arguments, maintain social standing, and challenge opponents. This study aims to identify and explain the rhetorical functions of impoliteness strategies used in the context of high stakes competitive debate. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this study analyzes data sourced from video documentation of the final round of the 7th IUDC Arabic Debate in 2024 in Qatar. The data were analyzed using content analysis techniques based on Culpeper’s framework of impoliteness. The results indicate the presence of all five impoliteness strategies: Bald on Record, Positive Impoliteness, Negative Impoliteness, Sarcasm, and Withhold Politeness, with sarcasm being the most dominant strategy. This dominance simultaneously undermines the opponent’s positive face while showcasing the speaker’s composure and analytical power before the judges. Each strategy was not chosen randomly but as a response to specific communicative demands, and the combination of their use by both finalist teams constitutes a face-management strategy inseparable from competitive success. This finding expands Culpeper’s framework of impoliteness by demonstrating that, in high stakes academic debates, impoliteness strategies function as cumulative rhetorical tools through which debaters establish their own authority, undermine their opponents’ credibility, and ultimately convince the judges of their team’s argumentative superiority.
References
Baketa, N., Kovačić, M., & Mornar, M. (2023). The Role of Debate in Cognitive Development and Development of Civic Awareness of Young People: A Qualitative Analysis. Sociologija, 8, 400–417. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1174503
Balai Pengembangan Talenta Indonesia. (2024). Pedoman Kompetisi Debat Masasiswa Indonesia 2024. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Berjawi, O., Khatoun, R., & Fenza, G. (2025). Analyzing the Persuasive Strategies of Influencers and News Media on Social Media. Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA66935.2025.11315277
Boginskaya, O. (2025). The Power of Stance: Linguistic Strategies in Donald Trump’s Election Campaign. Discourse and Interaction, 18(2), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2025-2-80
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Vol. 4. Cambridge university press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Vol. 28. Cambridge University Press.
Dara, E. S., Juliani, W., Afiqah, F., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies Used in the “Sleeping Beatuy” Movie. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i1.8825
Deliana, D., & Ganie, R. (2025). Using Debates in Teaching Speaking to EFL Learners: Perceptions of English Department Students. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025052
Febriyanto, R. A., & Manshur, U. (2025). Dampak Metode Debat terhadap Keterampilan Bahasa Arab (Berbicara) Siswa. AS-SABIQUN, 7(3), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v7i3.5703
Goffman, E. (1967). Ritual Interaction: Essays on face-to-face behavior Pantheon.
Gustiani, T., Aslinda, A., & Usman, F. (2022). Strategi Ketidaksantunan dalam Video Debat Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2019. SeBaSa: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v5i1.5501
Harun, H., Abdullah, H., Baharun, H., & Selamat, S. (2025). Rethinking Communicative Competence: Employers’ Perspectives of English Language Use in Professional Settings. Issues in Language Studies, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.10628.2025
Herrera, P. B., Cano-Iglesias, M. J., Franco-Mariscal, A. J., & López, Á. B. (2023). Impact of a Socio-Scientific Debate on the Argumentative and Decision-Making Skills of Preservice Secondary Teachers. Ensenanza de Las Ciencias, 41(3), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.5861
Irawati, R. A., Sujatna, E. T. S., & Yuliawati, S. (2023). Strategi Ketidaksantunan Sarkasme Warganet pada Kolom Komentar Instagram Ganjar Pranowo. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 911–930. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.739
Jabbar, A. N., & Al-Aadili, N. M. (2022). Impoliteness in Online Comments in The Johnny Depp and Amber Heard Trial. Association Res Militaris, 12(2), 4350–4363. https://resmilitaris.net/uploads/paper/c632eaae247bd940ee5bb6b0d418087f.pdf
Junaid, R., Santaria, R., & Thaba, A. (2021). Testing Responses to Sarcasm Reviewed from Gender and Social Relationship Aspects Using Discourse Completion Task. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911508
Khotimah, K., & Kusuma, E. R. (2024). Kontestasi Wacana Politik dalam Debat Capres RI 2024 Kajian Pragma-Dialektikal. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Metalingua, 9(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.21107/metalingua.v9i1.25094
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: an Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications.
Lazuardi, D. R., & Murti, S. (2021). Kemampuan Mahasiswa Menganalisis Struktur Retorika Debat pada Mata Kuliah Menyimak Komprehensif dan Kritis. Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajaran (KIBASP), 4(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v4i2.2126
Lestaria, E., Sari, D. P., & Budiman, B. (2024). Analysis Politeness and Impoliteness Youtube Chanel "Prabowo Subianto Bicara Gagasan Mata Najwa. EDUJ : English Education Journal, 2(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.59966/eduj.v2i1.1055
Masruddin, M., Amir, F., Langaji, A., & Rusdiansyah, R. (2023). Conceptualizing linguistic politeness in light of age. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 41-55.
Maulani, S., Rahmalia, N. A., Mubarok, M. D., & Susanti, E. (2024). Pemanfaatan Metode Debat terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara pada Mahasiswa. REFEREN, 3(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.22236/referen.v3i2.15727
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru.
Nasriandi, N., & Masruddin, M. (2021). The Use of British Parliamentary Debate Style in Teaching Speaking Skill. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(1).
Neshkovska, S. (2020). Impoliteness on the Political Stage: The Case of the 2019 Final Macedonian Presidential Debate. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 16(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2020-0013.
Sen, T. K., Naven, G., Gerstner, L., Bagley, D., Baten, R. A., & Rahman, W. (2023). DBATES: Dataset for Discerning Benefits of Audio, Textual, and Facial Expression Features in Competitive Debate Speeches. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(2), 1028–1043. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3103442
Sulistiyo, U. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Salim Media Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aditya Fitrah, Eva Lathifah Fauzia, Muhammad Ibnu Pamungkas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
