A Phonological Analysis of the Pronunciation of the Rhotic Sound in Word-Final Positions in Joko Widodo’s English Speech at Ecosperity Week 2023

Authors

  • Gea Amelia English Literature, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic States University, West Java, Indonesia
  • Andang Saehu English Literature, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic States University, West Java, Indonesia
  • Ice Sariyati English Literature, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic States University, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10311

Keywords:

Interlanguage phonology, rhoticity, intelligibility

Abstract

This study analyzes the realization of the /r/sound in word-final position in President Joko Widodo's English speech at Ecosperity Week 2023 to identify the phonological patterns of Indonesian speakers' interlanguage in the context of international communication. The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through non-participant observation of audio-visual speech documents and analyzed using phonetic transcription based on the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), classification of rhotic and non-rhotic patterns, and interpretation grounded in interlanguage theory. The results indicate that the realization of /r/ in word-final positions is variable but dominated by rhotic patterns, reflecting the strong phonological transfer from Indonesian as the first language. The /r/sound tends to be retained in high-lexical-load words, while non-rhotic variations, such as glottal substitution and deletion, emerge in specific contexts due to articulatory reduction and prosodic stress. These findings indicate that Joko Widodo's English pronunciation does not fully adhere to native speaker norms but rather represents a dynamic interlanguage phonological system through the interaction between L1 transfer and the phonological demands of English. This study confirms that in the context of international speeches, intelligibility is more important than achieving native-like pronunciation as long as the message is effectively conveyed.

References

Ambalegin, A., & Arianto, T. (2018). English Vowels and Consonants Mispronunciation of the Seventh President of the Republic of Indonesia in His Official English Speeches and Its Influencing Factors. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 2(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v2i2.678

Amalia, D., Saehu, A., & Nurhapitudin, I. (2019). The Translation of Indonesian passive voice into English in the novel 9 Summers 10 Autumns translated by Maggie Tjiojakin. CALL, 1(1), 9-19.

Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition. Language Teaching, 8(4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444800002822

Costa, D., & Serra, R. (2022). Rhoticity in English, a Journey Over Time Through Social Class: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Sociology, 7(902213). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.902213

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Endarto, I. T. (2024). Indonesian English: A Linguistic Identity in A Global Tongue. UGM Press.

Dickson, V., & Hall-Lew, L. (2017). Class, gender and rhoticity: The social stratification of non-prevocalic /r/ in Edinburgh speech. Journal of English Linguistics.

Kurniati, N. U. S., Koh, Y. H., & Kim, D. H. (2024). Phonological challenges in Indonesian syllabification: Insight from Korean learners. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 8(2), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i2.10071

LaScotte, D. K., & Tarone, E. (2022). Channeling Voices to Improve L2 English Intelligibility. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12812

Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564

Lin, Y., Li, F., Andrea, & Pollock, K. E. (2023). A conceptual model of second language pronunciation in communicative contexts: Implications for children’s bilingual education. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125157

Moniva, K., Garcia, A., Diamante, J., Minoza, J., & Avenido, M. (2024). President rodrigo duterte’s UN speech: An analysis on L1’s phonological influences on L2. HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL of SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 15(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.15.1.3139.2025

Niu, R., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). L2 learners’ pronunciation of English phonetic sounds. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 9(5), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v9n5.2363

Roach, P. (1991). English phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Saito, K. (2021). What Characterizes Comprehensible and Native‐like Pronunciation Among English‐as‐a‐Second‐Language Speakers? Meta‐Analyses of Phonological, Rater, and Instructional Factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3027

Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231.

Suhardianto, Mardiana, D., & Oktafiani, S. (2023). Joko Widodo’s English Pronunciation: Phonological Review. JOLADU: Journal of Language Education, 1(3), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.58738/joladu.v1i3.198

Syam, A. R., Gardner, S., & Cribb, M. (2024). Pronunciation Features of Indonesian-Accented English. Languages, 9(6), 222 https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9060222

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

Citation Check