Teacher's Pedagogical Competence in Teaching English In Secondary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10357Keywords:
classroom interaction, English teaching pedagogical competence, secondary school, student perceptionAbstract
This research aimed to analyze the pedagogical competence of English teachers, focusing on lesson planning and classroom implementation. Although pedagogical competence is widely recognized as a key factor in effective English language teaching, limited studies have examined its implementation in Islamic junior high schools, particularly by integrating both teacher and student perspectives. This research employed a qualitative design involving two English teachers and 52 eighth-grade students at MTs Al-Iman Bulus. The data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. They changed their teaching materials. Used different ways to engage students, like games, videos, and group tasks. Students liked these approaches: the friendly classroom environment, fair grading, and clear explanations. The students gave ratings with the classroom atmosphere (3.63), fair assessment (3.58), and clear explanations (3.56). However, teachers still faced challenges, like students having varying skill levels, not enough time, and some students lacking motivation. To overcome these, teachers used teaching methods that helped all students and activities that encouraged participation. Teachers adapted their teaching to meet the needs of all students and used activities. The results show that good teaching skills are really important for making classroom learning work and keeping students interested. Teachers need to keep trying to give feedback and use teaching tools in the right way. This research is helpful for English teachers at MTs Al-Iman Bulus and other similar Islamic junior high schools. It gives them ideas on how to make their teaching help students who are different and get students to take part in class. The results of this research can also help schools and educators come up with plans to make English language teaching and learning better.
References
Isadaud, D., Fikri, M. D., & Bukhari, M. I. (2022). The urgency of English in the curriculum in Indonesia to prepare human resources for global competitiveness. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v1i1.177
An, J., Macaro, E., & Childs, A. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference?. System, 98, 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102482
Gea, P. D. D., Telaumbanua, Y. A., Daeli, H., & Laoli, A. (2024). An Analysis Of Teachers’ Pedagogic Competence In Teaching English At Smp Negeri 2 Lotu In 2023/2024. EXPOSURE: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS, 13(2), 370-386. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/exposure
Fredricks, J. A. (2023). Getting Students Engaged in Learning. State Education Standard, 23(3), 6-12.
Amalia, T., & Syam, U. K. (2023). Analysis of Teachers Pedagogical Competence in Teaching English at The Second Grade of SMK NEGERI 4 GOWA. English Language Teaching Methodology, 3(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v3i1.227
Gunbayi, I. (2023). Data analysis and pedagogical understanding in qualitative educational research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7763207
Rahmandani, F., Handayani, T., & Kurniawan, M. W. (2025). Digital literacy improvisation in improving teacher’s pedagogical competence. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i1.83835
Djihat, A., Ampa, A. T., & Mallapiang, Y. (2024). AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHERS’ PEDAGOGIC COMPETENCE IN TEACHING ENGLISH YOUNG STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 BARAKA. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i1.501
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103249
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Using formative assessment to influence self-and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 535-557.
Zhu, M., Berri, S., & Zhang, K. (2021). Effective instructional strategies and technology use in blended learning: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6143–6161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10544-w
Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. Quality & Quantity, 58, 1011–1013.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of management science & engineering research, 5(1), 53-63.
Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2022). The effects of robot-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100425
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The qualitative report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Pinedo, L., Rodríguez-Hernández, C., & Díez, F. (2022). Changes in classroom assessment practices during emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2067123
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Ascd.
Brooks, C., Burton, R., Van Der Kleij, F., Ablaza, C., Carroll, A., Hattie, J., & Neill, S. (2021). Teachers activating learners: The effects of a student-centred feedback approach on writing achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nur Khamid, Tusino, Sri Widodo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
