Students’ Perception of Informal Assessment in the English Classroom At MYLIBERTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10389Keywords:
Students’ Perception; Informal Assessment; English Classroom; Mixed-Age Learning; Descriptive QuantitativeAbstract
This study aims to investigate students’ perceptions of informal assessment in the English classroom at MYLIBERTY in a mixed-age learning environment. This study used a descriptive quantitative design with one variable, namely students’ perceptions of informal assessment. The participants were 20 students selected through purposive sampling. The instrument was a questionnaire with 24 Likert-scale statements based on Robbins’ theory of perception (1996) and Brown’s concept of informal assessment (2004). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, and mean score. The results show that students have a very positive perception of informal assessment in all dimensions, namely perceiver factors, object factors, and situational context factors. The highest result was found in perceiver factors, especially motivation and attitude, showing that students feel more confident and motivated during informal assessment activities. Object factors such as assessment types, clarity of instructions, and novelty were also rated positively, indicating that informal assessment is considered clear, varied, and interesting. In situational context factors, students also responded positively to time allocation, classroom conditions, and social interaction, which support a comfortable learning environment. Overall, informal assessment helps increase students’ participation, confidence, and engagement in learning English. In conclusion, informal assessment gives a positive impact on students’ learning experience in mixed-age classrooms.
References
The Afra, F. T. (2024). EFL learners’ perception of non-active speakers.
Aji, A. G. (2016). Informal assessment for language skills: The learners' perspective. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL).
Anahita. (2023). An overview of quantitative research methods. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis.
Chuang Wang, J.-J. S. (2023). Student perceptions of assessment in Taiwan and the United States. Educational Research and Development Journal.
Chunxiu He, J. Z. (2022). Students' motivation for rubric use in the EFL classroom assessment environment. Frontiers in Psychology.
Darginaviciane, I. (2017). Self-assessment of language skills evaluation in English for specific purposes classrooms. Society, Integration, Education.
Estaji, M. (2024). Perceived need for teacher education course on assessment literacy development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education.
Futuh Handoyo, L. A. (2024). Using informal assessments in project-based learning to motivate students to speak up. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching.
Illananingtyas, T. (2022). Students’ perception of English language teaching in post-pandemic era. Journal Koulutus.
Jennifer A. Fredricks, P. C. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Julie Ponto, P. A.-B. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of Advanced Practitioner in Oncology.
Louis Deslauriers, L. S. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in active classrooms. PNAS.
Lusi Adelia Paskah Saragi, D. Y. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ perception of learning English for young learners. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya Tamaddun.
Melani, P. M. (2022). Formative assessment in teaching English. Panyonara: Journal of English Education.
Nurhayati, B. S. (2020). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions on formal and informal assessment. Journal on Language and Literature.
Nurul Isnaini, E. R. (2024). Students’ perception of Quizizz as assessment tool. Jurnal PAJAR.
OpenStax. (2018). Psychology 2e.
Purwati, A. N. (2020). Informal assessment in evaluating students’ speaking ability. Research and Innovation in Language Learning.
Qiong, O. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in Literature and Language.
Rejeki, S. (2020). Assessment for learning: Students’ perceptions of informal assessment. International Journal in Applied Linguistics of Parahikma.
Risfi, T. P. (2022). Students’ perception of peer learning strategy in blended learning. IKIP PGRI Pontianak.
Rokeman, N. R. (2024). Likert measurement scale in education and social sciences. Journal of Social Science.
Saeed, M. I. (2025). Formative assessment techniques on student achievement. Advance Social Science Archive Journal.
Siti Nur Azizah, Z. Q. (2025). Students’ perception on English textbook use. Journal of English Language and Education.
Somaye Ketabi, S. K. (2014). Classroom and formative assessment in language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susanna Hartikainen, L. P. (2022). Engineering students’ perceptions of teaching. European Journal of Engineering Education.
Yuni Titiyanti, S. A. (2022). Canva in digital learning process. Journal of Education and Development.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muh Nofal Lakasim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
