Total Physical Response in Vocabulary Learning: A Qualitative Study in Fourth Grade Students

Authors

  • Salma Zakiyah Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Leny Saili Rahmah Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Hamdan Hidayat Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.10856

Keywords:

Qualitative Research; Total Physical Response; Vocabulary Learning

Abstract

This study addresses low students’ engagements and limited vocabulary retention under traditional instruction at a public primary school in Bandung Regency. It aims to examine the qualitative implementation of the Total Physical Response (TPR) method and analyze its role in fostering student engagement. Unlike previous studies that predominantly measure TPR’s quantitative effectiveness, this study offers a novel contribution by exploring the deep qualitative nuances and lived experiences of young learners during the physicalization of words. Using a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected through observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the framework (Miles et al., 2014). The results revealed that TPR successfully trnasformed the passive classroom into an interactive environment, enhancing student immersion and behavioral engagement. Qualitative insights described a substantial improvement in English vocabulary retention, while also uncovering a nuanced spectrum of individual learning preferences, including students who still favored text-based learning. This study concludes that while TPR effectively breaks traditional passivity, primary school educators should practically integrate multi-sensory activities with diverse instructional methods to effectively accommodate distinct cognitive learning styles in daily vocabulary teaching.

References

Asher, J. J. (2000). Learning Another Language Through Actions (5th Edition). Sky Oaks Productions, Inc. https://archive.org/details/learninganotherl0002ashe

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4. ed). SAGE.

Dewi, N. L., & Fatmawati, A. (2022). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD TO TEACH VOCABULARY IN E-LEARNING. 4(1).

Feng Shan-shan. (2017). An Application of Total Physical Response to Primary English Teaching—A Case Study of Qingtong Primary School. US-China Foreign Language, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2017.01.006

Gayanti, R., & Satriani, I. (2020). TEACHING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i3.p414-419

Ibrohim, A. T., Septianti, A., & Sadikin, I. S. (2019). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY THROUGH TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i2.p145-156

Imanulhaq, R., & Ichsan, I. (2022). ANALISIS TEORI PERKEMBANGAN KOGNITIF PIAGET PADA TAHAP ANAK USIA OPERASIONAL KONKRET 7-12 TAHUN SEBAGAI DASAR KEBUTUHAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN. Waniambey: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.53837/waniambey.v3i2.174

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (1st ed). Pergamon.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Edition 3). Sage.

Naghiyeva, G. (2025). Revamping Traditional Methods: Evaluating the Grammar-Translation Method in Modern Language Teaching. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500111

Natsir, M., & Sanjaya, D. (2014). Grammar Translation Method (GTM) Versus Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); A Review of Literature. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.1p.58

Nuraeningsih, N., & Rusiana, R. (2016). Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery through TPR Storytelling. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 1(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v1i1.3

Pitaloka, D. A. D., Wigati, F. A., & Suryaman, M. (2025). Exploring Students Engagement in Learning Vocabulary through The Use of Total Physical Response (TPR) Method. 9(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.2.p.718-728

Putri, C. S. (2024). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TPR (TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE) METHOD IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY.

Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000075

Setiawan, D., Nurhajati, D., & Sulistyani, S. (2022). Teaching Vocabulary through Total Physical Response to Elementary Students. Journal of Development Research, 6(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i2.231

Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.017

Xie, R. (2021). The Effectiveness of Total Physical Response (TPR) on Teaching English to Young Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1202.11

Yuwono, B., & Triono, A. (n.d.). PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS KELAS VI SD MATERI SIMPLE FUTURE TENSE MELALUI METODE GRAMMAR TRANSLATION METHOD.

Zhou, R. (2017). Categorizing English Emotion Formulaic Sequences. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 13(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2017-0007

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

Citation Check