Student Engagement in Project-Based Learning during the Writing Learning Process: A Case Study at State Islamic Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.11381Keywords:
Project-Based Learning (PjBL), Student Engagement, Writing instruction, English as Foreign Language, Qualitative, Case StudyAbstract
Student engagement has become one of the most influential factors affecting students’ learning experiences and academic achievement, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. In writing instruction, students frequently encounter challenges related to idea generation, organization, language accuracy, and sustained motivation, making meaningful engagement essential for successful learning. Project-Based Learning (PjBL) has been widely recognized as a student-centered instructional approach that promotes collaboration, authentic learning, and active participation. Although previous research has reported the effectiveness of PjBL in improving students’ writing performance and motivation, limited attention has been given to how students demonstrate behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement throughout the writing process, particularly within Indonesian Islamic senior high schools. This research aims to analyze student engagement during the implementation of Project-Based Learning in the writing learning process at State Islamic Senior High School. A qualitative case study design was employed involving eleventh-grade students who participated in project-based writing activities. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). The findings indicate that students demonstrated varying levels of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement during different stages of project implementation. Collaborative learning activities encouraged active participation, increased learning motivation, and promoted deeper cognitive involvement during writing tasks. However, several students experienced challenges related to confidence, idea development, and sustained participation during revision activities. This research highlights the importance of creating collaborative learning environments that support multidimensional engagement throughout the writing process and provides pedagogical implications for English teachers implementing Project-Based Learning in EFL classrooms.
References
Aghayani, B., B., & Hajmohammadi, E. (2019). Project-based learning: Promoting EFL learners’ writing skills and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–15.
Bell, Stephanie, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43.
Creswell, John W., J. W., & Creswell, J. David, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, Norman K., N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Dörnyei, Zoltán, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Fredricks, Jennifer A., J. A., Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., P. C., & Paris, Alison H., A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Furwana, D., Muin, F. R., Zainuddin, A. A., & Mulyani, A. G. (2024). Unlocking the Potential: Exploring the Impact of Online Assessment in English Language Teaching. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 653-662.
Harmer, Jeremy, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hyland, Ken, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Krajcik, Joseph S., J. S., & Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.
Larmer, John, J., Mergendoller, John R., J. R., & Boss, Suzie, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning. ASCD.
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
Miles, Matthew B., M. B., Huberman, A. Michael, A. M., & Saldaña, Johnny, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, Michael Quinn, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Thomas, John W., J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Vygotsky, Lev S., L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yin, Robert K., R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Ikhsan Amal, I G A Lokita Purnamika Utami, Ni Luh Putu Eka Sulistia Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access)
