Design of Deep Learning Teaching Module in Text Learning Report Observation Results in Class VIII of State Junior High School LIK Layana Indah

Authors

  • Amina I.P Indonesian Language and Literature Education, FKIP Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Juniati Indonesian Language and Literature Education, FKIP Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Sukma Indonesian Language and Literature Education, FKIP Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Ulfah Indonesian Language and Literature Education, FKIP Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Fadillah Indonesian Language and Literature Education, FKIP Tadulako University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v14i1.11468

Keywords:

Design, Teaching Modules, Deep Learning, Observation Report Text

Abstract

This study aims to describe the design of Deep Learning-based teaching modules  developed to support meaningful, active, and student-centered learning. Based on the results of problem identification and needs analysis, data was obtained that the teaching modules used so far have not been fully able to facilitate the in-depth development of students' competencies, especially in the aspects of critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, creativity, and learning reflection. This research was carried out using one of the stages in the research and development method, namely the product design stage. Deep Learning-based teaching modules  are designed through preliminary studies which include analysis of teacher and student needs, analysis of student characteristics, curriculum analysis, and theoretical studies on deep learning. Based on the results of the study, a Deep Learning-based teaching module design was obtained  which consists of several main components, namely cover design, foreword, table of contents, general information of the module, learning outcomes and objectives, concept maps, learning activities that integrate mindful, meaningful, and joyful principles learning, student activity sheets, learning assessments, reflections, and bibliographies. The design of this teaching module is expected to support the creation of a more meaningful learning experience and improve the quality of the process and learning outcomes of students.

References

Alfiana, I. F., Sobri, M., & Ryusyada, G. N. (2026). Development of Teaching Materials Based on Local Wisdom with a Deep Learning Approach in Science Subjects. Walada: Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 1913-1923.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc..

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2003). Teaching for quality learning. Buckingham: Society for.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1): 7–74.

Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard university press.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (1985). The systematic design of instruction.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2017). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.

Iwan, I., Maulina, M., Rahmiatin, T., Sain, Y., Syarif, A. R., Fansury, A. H., ... & Stanikzai, I. U. (2026). Digital Implementation of Formative Assessments to Improve Student Engagement and Reading Comprehension. Journal of Community Service of the Nation, 4(3), 926-935.

CULTURE, R. (2022). DECREE OF THE MINISTER OF EDUCATION, CULTURE, RESEARCH, AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 56/M/2022 CONCERNING GUIDELINES FOR CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CONTEXT OF RECOVERY.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. 2022. Learning and assessment guidelines for early childhood, primary and secondary education (Independent Curriculum). Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Oecd, O. (2018). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(1), 6-17.

Prastowo, A. 2015. Creative guides create innovative teaching materials. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Ratri, S. Y., Wagiran, W., Riyadi, A., Firdaus, F. M., & Delosa, J. (2026). Deep Learning in Indonesian Education: A Systematic Review of Theory and Practice. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(2), 176-191.Komara, R., Widyamahati, T., Sahara, S., & Novita, L. (2026). Deep Learning in Elementary Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Conceptual Comprehension, HOTS, and Learning Quality. JIIP-Scientific Journal of Education, 9(3), 3066-3071.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4): 460–475.

Slavin, R. E. 2018. Educational psychology: theory and practice (12th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Suparno, P. 2013. The philosophy of constructivism in education. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Educational research methods of quantitative, qualitative and R&D approaches.

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

Citation Check